Princess Arabia

Not in a bad or serious way, but in conversations. Yesterday I had a long conversation with a friend about life in general and the topic turned into thoughts, which turned into good and bad, which turned into good and bad people, which was where the miscommunication started. I mentioned that people are acting from good intentions (a video of Leo's; and I also recognize this myself to be the case), and that we all are inherently good. He then said to me, "oh yeah, what about Hitler, Putin, Genghis Khan and other famous dictators". I said they were bad people acting from good intentions. Then I attempted to explain how but was met with repeated resistance. "How can the murder of millions of people be classified as a good intention?" He asked. I tried to explain their motivations and to look what happened to Iraq when the US invaded; and the country fell apart. He then said he knew people that were in the Iraq war and continued to give surface level reasonings as to why and how these people were bad people and why the country fell apart. I had to be continuously stating that I didn't condone the killing of these people nor am I saying they were good people; but there's an underlying element there as to why these people act the way they do and it's something they themselves aren't even aware of in respect to it coming from a good intention but merely from survival. He kept his argument going (respectfully) by stating how money, power and greed is the root of all this. I said to him his neighbor is probably greedy, loves power and money but would never be motivated to commit such heinous crimes; so, there must be another element there. He just couldn't understand what I was trying to say even when I said I would watch the video again so I could explain it better. I even offered to send him the video to watch for himself; but of course, who would believe a YT video with a bald-headed guy talking on a camera for 2hrs more than maybe say a serious documentary on CNN explaining this in detail. People are entrenched in paradigms and expect to get their information from a particular source that is more recognizable and has a more authoritative quality to it. I know, because I've also experienced this type of prejudice because I'm not a noted "professional". Anyway, the video in question wasn't sent as I figured it wasn't asked for, nor was there any enthusiasm to see it. I quickly turned the conversation around and started talking about something else that was more on common ground. I don't go around discussing Leo's videos on these similar types of topics like wars and survival and self-deception and survival much because the average person will probably not understand it unless they've had previous exposure to the existential nature of reality and some background on the mind and how mental the Universe is. I try to keep the conversations normal, which I don't mind, since I'm always studying by myself these kinds of topics. It's just that sometimes a regular conversation can turn into these things unexpectedly, but it's very rarely ever received and sometimes trying to explain makes one seem to be condoning wrong doing. Just thought i'd share. Thanks, Leo, for these types of videos because they make one understand better about human behaviour, even the people we come across that resist these explanations and to realize why even them cannot see pass their own paradigms and levels. It makes for less judgements and understandings on the person's part who is mature and wise enough to recognize where the ignorance stems.

Why is it hard for you to communicate without throwing punches at people. You keep saying I don't mean to be rude and no offense. None taken. But the same way, you're saying trying to engage in any meaningful conversation is pointless I could say the same thing. You haven't once asked me any questions about what I truly mean in anything I said, Nor made any queries to ne about what I'm trying to communicate, to be clear yourself that I'm really misunderstanding what he's saying. I'm not saying this is nor isn't the case, but those are signs someone gives to communicate to the other that they are really interested in know clearly and without any doubt that the other person is obviously misunderstanding the message. Maybe it's you that hasn't understood the message, not saying that's the case, but a deeper inquiry and questioning the other is a sure sign that you even care to truly understand what they're communicating and that maybe you're just misunderstanding them. All this doesn't have to be done but to tell the other person with such surety that they are misunderstanding the message, to me, warranties this process. I rest this case thanks for your input.

Stop with this already. lmao . While we're at it he should change the name Actualized.org to Crocodilezed.net lol

Hard to communicate these things with words. People have different definitions for different words. Yes, bad is just an idea so is good.

Ok, you're right. Watch the video that @FlyingLotusshared in the link from his comment to me. It explains it better than I can. You don't have to but, I'm still sticking to what I'm saying and you can keep disagreeing. Nothing wrong with that. I already understood the depth of the message but these things are hard to communicate because they are so radical and profound. Certain points are just being misunderstood and i don't think I can fully communicate them to someone who thinks they already know what I'm trying to communicate.

How can God be selfish when it's formless. We are playing word semantics here. Good in this sense just means it cannot be bad if it's unlimited and infinite. Selfish can only be where there is form. Please don't ask me if a stone is good. A stone is not sentient, it doesn't have feelings.

This is obvious, but surface level thinking. Hate can only come from loving something else and people have different sides to themselves. Ever stop to think a part of someone is hating another part and is using the part they love to destroy the part they hate. What part of a person is it that hates themselves. If that person sees themselves as whole, there would be nothing outside of that whole to hate. So saying someone hates themselves you have automatically divided that person into 'here I am, but there's a part of me that hate the other part". This is what she was trying to point to.

Forget about the AI Leo bot I shared. I read your conversation with gpt-4. It's still missing the point. People are acting from selfish intentions is still on the surface level and trying to explain away why people do what they do. The bigger message here is that God or whatever you call it, is inherently good (not selfish) and is acting through EVERYONE. It just it manifests in different ways and appears to the limited relative mind as bad but nothing bad can come from something that's inherently good without it being "filtered" in some way and can only be perceived by a limited perception as bad.

Beautifully said, thank you.

Ok thank you, I'll check it out.

Beautiful video.

Yes, I touched on it briefly and they even asked me to explain my stance, but they just couldn't see it. I found myself having to keep saying I'm not condoning atrocious behavior and just turned the topic around. Money, power and greed is a surface level understanding on the reasons why dictators act the way they do. Most people are influenced by these things on different levels but we have to go deeper to understand why.

https://chatgpt.com/share/670d6194-db74-8012-a4f7-de8129510d47 I used it to test what it says about People acting from good intentions.

https://chatgpt.com/share/670d6194-db74-8012-a4f7-de8129510d47 This is what Leo AI bot had to say in summary about everyone acts from good intentions.

The heading of the post is a bit misleading as this is not about me spreading Leo's teachings and then having people disagreeing. It's about a conversation that led to a topic that Leo did a video about and could have been used as an explanation, if understood correctly, as to the point i was making in the discussion. Leo is the only person I've been exposed to that has spoken about this topic in such detail and was only using his teaching/video/explanation as a reference point. A POINT THAT I ALSO AGREE WITH because I also can see the depth of what the message was about. This thread is also an example how one can get misunderstood and the details get misconstrued. If you read the post and understood it properly for what it was saying and not what you thought was the case, you would have realized that this isn't about the teachings of Leo but about a conversation I had and used a teaching from Leo's perspective to get my point across. Like using an example of what you're trying to say. This wasn't about you are God and it's all an illusion and you're imagining everything and you will never die. It was a deep conversation but about normal affairs of the world that turned to dictators and how they were bad people and I was trying to show how everyone is actually acting from good intentions; and i found myself having to explain that away but it wasn't well received. Wasn't about spreading Leo's teachings and saying I've stopped spreading Leo's teachings a long time ago isn't what this is about. Sometimes why I write such lengthy posts is so I can make myself clear by sticking in the details i find necessary to accomplish that, but people still read and interpret however they feel and misses the whole point anyway.

This is not about mentioning Leo. It's about having a conversation that led to a topic on a video he made and was trying to use it as a reference. If I knew of another video to reference, i would have done the same with that video. How many videos are there on this topic on yt that one can just reference to off the top of your head.

This topic is being misconstrued. No one is speaking about what's good or bad, and if the actions of people are good or bad. What you described is obviously atrocious, but that's not what the message is about. Watch the video in question and you will see what the post is pointing to. This is why I think Leo is very brave and courageous in putting himself out there with radical topics like these where his is vulnerable to being misunderstood and people misunderstanding the messages he tries to convey. What you've written here, and every thing else under the sun that humans commit unto each other still doesn't stray away from the message that their intentions were still coming from a place where they thought they were doing good but it's not the type of good that we're used to in the description of the word. Don't for once think I'm condoning any of these heinous actions but delving into the psychology of why.

I'm through with that sly, cunning, fox of an ego there. I'm responding to the assumptions you're making about why women post pics online and assuming things. And giving unsolicited advice to men on how to read things and projecting your own boundaries and beliefs. Anyone reading ALL your comments, can tell what you've written here is not ALL you're doing.

Yeah, I eat them once in awhile, I just don't make it a habit.

I've read enough to know you're telling people how to run their relationships as if they're not adult enough to do so. Also, you're assuming women are looking for validation and whatever else you're assuming. Some are, some are not. How will you know which ones are and also SO WHAT. It's just another way to do what you've also done at one time another in your life. SAUGHT VALIDATION. Who cares. I don't see them murdering people and doing mass shootings, go focus on how to stop those and leave people and their relationships that didn't ask you anything alone.

Love you. Now go watch some more Nero.

Are you aware plenty of men love for their women to show off their bodies. YOU ARE PROJECTING YOUR BELIEFS UNTO THE WORKD ABOUT SEXY PICS ONLINE. I've had men make suggestions to me to do stuff I'm not comfortable with and they were respectful men who cared about me. They just didn't see anything wrong with it. They just thought I was beautiful and could do that stuff too. Plenty of high caliber men and men of means, social status, respectable men who love women, enjoy women and are well established some if them love it when their beautiful women show classy sexy pics of themselves online. I'm sure there are also men of these calibers who don't. I only mentioned those things to make the point that it's not disrespectful, low-life, dirty or abusive men etc that will encourage their women to do this because they donlt respect them, it's men of all categories. Usually it's secure men who have businesses to attend to, have an established life and are taking care of their women who don't give a shit about these issues. It's dusty men who are insecure and don't have much going for themselves who do and who wastes time and energy about this petty things in life.

Don't even bother mentioning this. The clever mind will find all types of reasons why it's a different story. Men don't realize thyre the ones projecting their sexual beliefs unto women. They don't realize that for some women posting sexy pics is like posting a pic in a winter coat. To them it's just fucking posting a pic. Women have sexy bodies, they post a pic and that's it. If you didn't do an interview to ask her her reason for posting that pic, you're projecting and assuming. Period. Same goes for men

Nice, I'll just move when there's a hurricane coming. Better yet rain. For $10,000, why not and rent it out.

You're just used to seeing hardships in life and thinking that's how life's supposed to be. I'm not speaking about human's drive or success rate or what motivates them. We are creative beings by nature and the same way that survival is a motivational thing to get people to move their ass to support themselves, being creative can also be motivational to get things done. Suffering also drives people to suicide, depression and lethargy. Most people after a certain age get sick, why you think that is. Half the United States are on medication and most are obese not to mention the ones in mental institutions and the ones on drugs. These conditions are in massive quantities, so I'm not just referring to a few. Can't be productive while mentally challenged and it's tough when you're physically ill. Suffering is not what motivates people, in fact it's the opposite. It might motivate them to want to change their lives but so does happiness, having lots of energy, will and a healthy drive to do so. It's easier and more pleasing to the body and psyche to do it from the latter while getting the same results.