Princess Arabia

There is simply writing happening and apparent reading happening, by no one. It's just simply happening. When you pee do you say who am I peeing to. Isn't peeing a verb. It's just peeing happening.

Please stop using neo advaita excuse with me. I don't know what that is, you do, or you wouldn't be mentioning that name. I said there's no one to wake up. Those words were expressed here. What that means is there is no one already and no one to make a decision to or not to write these words, so, the very question, "why do I bother to write" isn't saying anything because I already said there's no one. I'm not rejecting duality. How can there be a rejection of what doesn't actually exists. Duality cannot stand on it's own, therefore it's not a reality. It is the dream. Make sense and I'll listen.

The individual. The one that thinks it's separate. It's that sense of separation that comes with it everything else that arises in that energy. Time, space, linearity, here, there, I am, me, continuity, autonomy, ownership, all of it.

There is no separation. Pointers towards the truth? The words, the pointer, the so-called truth, all the same. You're talking observer stuff. Witness. Dream. Illusion. "The truth remains unchanged and beyond words" suggests continuity which can only be in the dream. There is no mistake to be made, ever, but only in the dream. Seeing beyond words to the truth they indicate suggests time and space, there's none. Wake up. Ooops, no one there to wake up.

Words can't point to shit. The words are the same thing it's pointing to.

Most delusional statement there is. The person is knowledge itself. Both go together. The only reason you are is because you know that you are. I know, therefore I AM. Who is dropping and who is surrendering, Then who is the you that remains after the you surrenders and drops itself. Spiritual jargon and mumbo jumbo.

How do you know this. If nobody knows jack, then you don't know this.

5+5=10.....3+7=10.....The sum is the same; they equal up to the same thing. Equations are different. Just because it's said the genders are equal doesn't mean the saying means there are no differences. Equal and same are two different things. We can still be equal with different traits. We are relatively different doesn't mean we can't be relatively equal.

This is why I said that's all I'm going to say because I didn't want to go there. It's obvious, but sometimes certain things are best left unsaid. I'm tired of fighting with James, so when I see a decent post from him, I just acknowledge it.

I also never said that you were angry at women. Read my comment again. Saying we don't do something because we're not that angry at men isn't suggesting that I think you are.

Do you realize that there's a sense that arises in humans that makes it appear to be the center of the Universe. To make it seem localized. To make it appear as if there is a you located in the body. There's no one that can work around this sense. The absence of this sense is the absence of the individual. There's no one left to know it isn't there. Just because this is seemingly known or recognized, it cannot be used as a gain or as a value to the individual. Anything of value is for the individual that senses a person there. It isn't even happening already so there's nothing that can be done about it. It can, however fall away to reveal it never happened in the first place. This is why in sleep there's no one there. No time, no space. Dreams occur. Continuity seems to occur but only when there's an observer. Ever spaced out for a nano second just to come back to reality. As if you were never there to witness anything. It's like that. If that sense goes away permanently, things just happen on auto pilot. No one senses anything happening to them. Just like an auto pilot in an airplane. It flies itself. That's already what's happening but that sense makes it feel personal. It is happening TO ME. No process or practice can drop this sense permanently. It will come back. Drunks pass out. Not remembering a thing that occurred the night before. Why is that. It's temporary because of a substance. Couldn't have happened if there was a real self there to begin with. Amnesia, Alzheimer's how's that possible. When I say something weird is happening here. That's what I mean. It's weird asf. That sense is here. I feel it. Something here intuits it's not real though, and I don't know what that is.

If nature doesn't have a self, why do you assume you have a self - Leo Gura. BINGO!!!

😅

As soon as a woman is nice to a man, he takes that as she likes him sexually. That's why we tend to not show our niceness to men all around. Not mean, but not nice. Hi how are you. I smile and say hi back. Do you have a boyfriend. Who wants to have to go through that convo every time we smile to just say hi. Hi how are you. No response. Oh she's so mean. So now we just pretend not to hear or see you. I've seen it on here so many times how guys will get all excited just because a woman speaks friendly to them and because nothing happened, they take it as they didn't take it any further or they blame themselves for not taking it to the next level or that she liked them but it didn't go any further for reasons they weren't aggressive enough with as if she would have if only they did. Maybe she's the same way with the old lady up the street. There's a way to say hi and a way to say hhiiii to a man. Any hi to him is she likes me. Learn to decipher the difference and stop telling us to be nice to you and to smile. You take it the wrong way at times. Now we have to work our way into the exit.

This is the key right here. Of course, there are general traits men and women have specifically as in men are more logical, more competitive, etc and women more sensitive and emotional oriented etc, but I've seen both have similar traits all around and just depends on the person and probably more depends on up-bringing, experiences, worlds views and mindsets, even culture and nationality based. I've seen men whine and bitch and start drama and women as cool as a church mouse with no worries in the world. We tend to be more personal about our biases and experienced oriented. The only commonality I hear most women categorize most men as are cheaters and liars and it's usually based on their own experiences and will usually only vent and carry on about it if it's a discussion already taking place, not start a random discussion about it.

One of the most pure posts I've seen from you. Nothing to say here about it other than that.

That's a surprise. A very left-brained woman, imo. Very logical. Am I right. Just an opinion from my observations on your types of posts.

It's not a tactic, it's not in secret and we aren't afraid of being exploited in this way. You've totally interpreted what I've said in your own way. I'm saying I don't think the few women on here will go up against a male-dominated forum to start topics about what we don't like about men simply because we're not angry at men enough to do that and smart women don't go up against men in that way. It's not like we're pm-ing each other in secret about what we don't like about men and we're definitely not worried about the men on here exploiting us for our opinions about men. (this is just my opinion from what I've observed about the active women on here and not a fact, just an intelligent guess and could be wrong; so bear that in mind) You have to realize I'm referring to a certain category of women, more on the intelligent side, also more feminine and less confrontational. I can be confrontational, but it's usually to stand up for myself after being personally attacked or when I'm being misunderstood and that's a personality issue not a gender issue. Women of a certain breed won't find too many general things to dislike about men but only in their personal relationships. If a man does something to her personally. She'll vent on that most likely and not draw every man into the equation. I'm not saying there aren't general things these types of women don't like about men, but it's not worth starting topics about on a male-dominated forum just to get rebutted and bring out defense mechanisms when it's nothing personal for her. Do you agree @Natasha Tori Maru @Emerald @Sugarcoat @Judy2. Just to get a feel of what I'm saying is a shared opinion and not just speaking for myself. I could be wrong. This is just my take.

I can see this to be the case because the biggest question I have is how are we all seeing the same things from different sets of eyes and hearing the same things from different sets of ears. This explains why to a degree, even though I still see it as a form of illusion and it's just seeing happening and no one is actually seeing anything.

Are you saying that you actually jumped on purpose. Tried to kill yourself. I know you said you're not suicidal, so I'm a bit confused about what you're saying. Are you literally in the hospital now from the injuries and how are you doing, if that's the case.

Well maybe the use of the words "seemingly" and "seems to" would be more appropriate to use along with those phrases since it's not really happening, a.k.a. Illusion.

Are you nuts. Us women here are too smart for that., hehe. We observe, then we act accordingly. We don't compete with men, we adjust. That's the win win. We don't see men as problems, we figure out the solutions. Not that what you say doesn't happen elsewhere and maybe the same women here wouldn't do that elsewhere, but we're smart enough not to do that on a male dominated forum. We save that for amongst ourselves.

OK. I guess you're just pointing out certain differences you see. I guess it just seems like criticisms instead of pointing out and showing what femininity can look like at times in it's different forms of expressions.

How can it perceive itself and be aware of itself. Doesn't that suggests duality.

Seems like @OBEler wants women to be men and men to stay as men. Embrace the differences. Both are similar and different. The heading of the thread alone, especially with the use of the word "wildly", seems to suggests a problem with the difference in interests. If men and women were the same expressions, that itself would be problematic for the balancing of life itself. Both generally balances each other out. Seems like there's a problem there integrating your feminine side but I leave that part for @Emeraldto tackle. She can speak on that more diplomatically and I'm also curious to see if she feels this way about it too.