Princess Arabia

I could still be talking to my momma right now even though there's not a body there. The same thing would happen as if she was apparently still here. "Hi mom", no body and there's no answer. "Hi mom", a body and she answers back "hi". Now I'm believing she's a person that answered. Now, everything's fine and I believe my mom is alive and well, well in fact, she was never there to begin with; just a body replying back "hi". I don't and won't hear that reply now saying "hi", back because I believe she's dead. I have proof. I saw a body in a coffin and there's no body in front of me. I was hallucinating her the whole time, now I'm not anymore so I won't hear a reply back. The body isn't here just as that donkey isn't here in front of me so why would I be talking to either. I see both and now I can have a rapport with both. Truth of the matter is it was just a body to begin with. Just as I see a smashed car, I see a dead body. Because I associated my mom to be a person in that body, now she's dead and the car is just a smashed car. There's no difference. That's why people can still hear voices and no body in sight. The body isn't speaking or hearing. It's just hearing and speaking happening. Voice voicing. People aren't crazy. Perceptions just aren't appearing. We misunderstand and now they're lunatics in the psyche ward. Schizophrenia is one such thing. I'll leave this alone for now, as it's a fresh insight I just had and it's all over the place. Jesus, this shit is coming to me in pieces.

It's not a denial of duality, it's an exposure that it isn't real. Not really happening. Fear, anxiety and panics are an effect of that exposure. We fear because something there feels something isn't real. A threat is only a threat when there's someone or something that feels threatened. Why it feels threatened is because it feels, has a sense, that it is happening to it. If that sense wasn't there, we'd all be dead. Not necessarily physically, but the sense of an I, personhood, individuality, separation would cease to exist. The circumstance would still happen, but no one there to perceive a threat or be fearful. It's how the sense of self sustains itself.

Being isn't prior to anything. It is everything. From this, everything else you're saying is delusion. I'll also say, you said, "to know being", being can't be known. I won't even attempt to dissect it all. I'll just leave it be. I know you're sick of me. Razaard will do the rest even though you'll just rebut everything he says. Get one thing off and the rest just follows. Good news is it's all "being" as you put it, I call it nothing, but it doesn't matter and nothing can be wrong in that sense.

Who is seeing the Being. Thought I was being. How can I see myself. I'll leave you alone.

Nothing appears and disappears in the Absolute. Nothing is in anything. The Absolute is everything even the apparent appearing and disappearing. So nothing happens in the Absolute.

When a teacher is in the classroom trying to teach, does she dismiss her classmates when they rebut her or challenges her stance on what she's teaching? No, she doesn't say no more talking to you. You want people to just believe what you're trying to teach and when they keep challenging you say no more talking with you. It's too much to handle. I'm not being disrespectful just a conversation. To me that shows you just want to be heard and spout out your beliefs without hearing any rebuttals. Typical. It's a sign I look out for.

"If" is not a reality.

@EmeraldNicely said.

Ok.

No. The body is writing all on it's own without a you there. It is not a denial of duality. Duality and the Absolute are the same thing. There's no such thing as duality so how can it be denied. That's the dream, a dream that's not happening.

How many times am I going to answer this question. No one is writing. Writing is writing itself. The me will never understand this because it is stuck in it's dream. It is the dream.

So where are the advaita drones located. Where is the something located that's doing it.

Who is the you here that's not in control; and if he's not in control of how the heart, liver, etc works, how is he to let the body do it's job. I guess he's in control of some things but not everything. Just enough control to be still and let the body do it's job. I wonder who's working the heart and liver and who works the "let the body do it's job". See how confused you are.

This is the most ridiculous command. Who are you talking to. Who must let the body do it's job. There's no one there to let the body do it's job. The body is doing it's job regardless. Are you talking to the person outside the body. Not sure. Who?

Makes no sense. Just like typical spirituality. No doer, no self, life goes on, blah blah, then you instruct. Make a call to action. Do this, do that, its a trap. Youre the one in the trap if anything but not really because there's no you to be in a trap. You see it's all already done. All the same thing. Nothing can go wrong and nothing needs to change. Even my saying it makes no sense. Your post sounds good and all to the me but its all nonsense. To love unconditionally? No one can love unconditionally because that is already unconditional love being all dualities and conditional love. The body is not a form appearing within the self. There is no self. Disguise of the mind? There is no mind. When the false self is gone? There is no false self. Stop listening to those Alan Watts, Osho, Eckhart, and whomever else you're listening to. They speak to the dream as you speak to the dream and so does every spiritual teaching. The dream of separation because the whole doesn't need to be taught anything. Nothing wrong with it, but it's all empty and means nothing. It's not about denying duality, it's about recognizing it for what it is. To deny is acknowledgment that it exists. It doesn't. Everything is already not two. I'm not saying you're not correct, but it's within the dream scope. So you're not really telling anyone anything that's of value because the dream just isn't happening in the first place. There's no one there. It's the only illusion. If you really break apart what you're saying it falls to crumbles. There are no traps, no one is denying anything and there is no self, neither true or false.

Women don't typically see men; they see the guy. That particular male. Men see women. Body parts. Looks. She likes him. He tickles her fancy. The look just happens to be there. She looks good to him. He's attracted to her looks. That's why for women, it's not so much men are this and men are that when they're criticizing men. It's, that guy did this to me and that guy did that to me, even if they're talking about men in general. They're not really, in that mind they're imaging a particular guy. For men, they're usually generalizing, seeing it as all or most women. It's very rare where it's personal for men. They like you that way, for marriage, long-term, etc because you like them dearly, you make them feel a certain way, it's not so much the female. Very rare a man has to persuade a woman into marriage. He already knows for the most part, she'll say yes and if not, it's because she's not ready for marriage in general and it's not him. Men like to lock down a female he knows is very much into him. Doesn't want her to get away.

How the hell is earth spinning so rapidly in space but i don't feel it. I'm not even going to attempt geography because i suck at it. My best subjects in school were English, accounts and arts. Went to secretarial college too. Sucked at biology and physics. Hated Literature. I was good at sports. Running and netball (island female version of basketball). Went to church and even got baptized at 14yrs old with my mother. Baptist. When I went on my own at 20/21yrs it took 2yrs after that to figure out religion was not for me. Why is this man shouting in my ear I would say. Notice how pastors shout and gurus whisper. That's enough. Gnite Ariel. That's my body's name. I named my body Ariel. Let's go to bed Ariel. I'm never alone, I got Ariel with me at all times.

What is it that makes one person appear stupid and another appear genius when both were born knowing nothing.

I wonder why Steve Jobs's last words were "wow, wow, wow".

Hello and welcome.

I've been. No sense in keeping it going forever.

OK. Doesn't change a thing.

These words aren't the dream. The one that reads these words is. The one that thinks it's seeing these words, understanding and relating to these words is the dream. These words are simply just wording.

There is simply writing happening and apparent reading happening, by no one. It's just simply happening. When you pee do you say who am I peeing to. Isn't peeing a verb. It's just peeing happening.

Please stop using neo advaita excuse with me. I don't know what that is, you do, or you wouldn't be mentioning that name. I said there's no one to wake up. Those words were expressed here. What that means is there is no one already and no one to make a decision to or not to write these words, so, the very question, "why do I bother to write" isn't saying anything because I already said there's no one. I'm not rejecting duality. How can there be a rejection of what doesn't actually exists. Duality cannot stand on it's own, therefore it's not a reality. It is the dream. Make sense and I'll listen.