Princess Arabia

What nothing can reveal is that there is no person in the body because there's no one to reveal it to. All the psych's cannot reveal that with "reveal" being the operant word. Everything else said though can be a revelation to the fictious person that it's not really there. Energy can pick that up. Something there can realize that if it's open enough. "Everyone is me", yes, because once there's a me everything is in relation to that, if there's no me, there's no "everyone". You see everyone as you only because you think there's a you. What comes with that is you imagining everyone and everything else as real. When there is no you, there is no relation between you and anything and all is simply what is. "You are all alone" in timeless infinity because you are all alone as a me and others are just bodies. There is no such thing as "everyone is me" because there is no me and DMT cannot reveal that if there's a subject /object relationship.

We claim everything as our own but try to disown the things that doesn't feel good. We try to "deal with" emotions that doesn't feel good. How do i deal with anger. How can I get rid of suffering; not how do I deal with happiness and how do I get rid of joy. None of these emotions belong to anyone. We own them but then try to get rid of the ones that doesn't feel good. The seeking energy displays so much neurosis it's not even funny and we all have some of it to a point. Why seek to be happy when sadness is also. Why try to deal with anger and not joy. Distinctions. This cannot be dealt with, it cannot be gotten rid of. Enlightenment cannot get rid of suffering because it didn't cause suffering to begin with.

Lol. If I had a journal documenting my fake problems, addictions and reliving trauma and rehashing memories of stuff that ain't happening, that would make for a cool journal. A journal about the Absolute in my own words even though that's also the absolute talking is pathetic. Cool. Not phased. Neurosis not that prevalent here, just a little bit. What will your next post be, how do I what? Be more advanced? Hehe

The Absolute cannot be turned into a process or work in progress.

I'm not anything. It's all quite obvious.

No one gets anywhere in this work. EVER. There will always be seeking more, seeking for bigger and better, seeking for more extravagance, but nothing will ever be found and no one will ever get there. This is it. There is no next, before or after or becoming. This is just not enough for that energy. It tries everything under the sun but never arriving. Problem arises when it gets a taste. Now it keeps going but never arrives. Nothing wrong and nothing needs to change. There's no one to, its all happening on it's own.

No, words are just words, stories are stories.

What is aware of what where there's no separation. Yes, there's awareness in the dream, the dream that's not really happening. It is part of the package including consciousness and the I am. Of course I say you and me and our and us, but making a video of that nature is misleading to say you are reality then proceed to instruct on what to do with that information.

Sorry to tell you, but there's no next. This is it. Show me a next. Only the me that lives in it's institutionalized dream world seeks a next. It can't help it because the past present and future is what keeps it going and what it bases it's reality off of. There is not an actual next to get to because next is based on a time frame and time is an illusion. There is no next because this is timeless and boundless. There's just chasing its own tail. That's the only next there is.

All stories.

He had me until the approx 2:00 marker. After that is just the usual you are this and that and you are awareness itself pretending to be a person.....blah blah. In the beginning i was like, finally a video comes close...then he started with the generic awareness shit. Oops, no, no. You are not eternal, you are not reality itself you are not awareness pretending to be you, you are not everything, you are not one with everything. THERE SIMPLY IS JUST NO YOU. If you are reality itself, then why is he telling you what to do with yourself. Why is he instructing on what to do. He's reality and i'm reality and as reality he's telling reality what to do with reality.

No one owns any philosophy. Wasn't Jim and Tony babies at one time. Where did they get it from. Borrowed? What a joke. Let me see you write an entire journal for a year and a half filled with this stuff written in your own words. Ok, I'll start posting about life's problems just so you can feel at home and have some company.

I think i've watched one or two Jim videos since this year started, I never watch Tony because I just can't stand how he speaks and I'm not a fan, I don't watch Anna anymore and I'm not sure who Andreas is. Stop making ASSumptions.

Exactly, more about what it is that you want. Using people to get what you want. Nothing advanced about that. It might seem to you that you're advanced but it's just disguised tension and an uncomfortable feeling with what's appearing. It's unsettling. Advanced would be more like seeing things for what they are and relating to what is in a more advanced way instead of trying to make people into what they're not.

When one has come to the realization that all is included, and life is unfolding as it is on very different scales to the observer, one will stop trying to make everyone like them and realize that it's all perfect in it's own right. Nothing more amazing about you and nothing stupid about them. Nothing positive about being more philosophical and nothing negative about not being. Infact, the wisest man will realize and understand that they are just different shades of the same thing. I consider it more stupid to want to change people from what they are, thinking your way is the better way. It is selfishness and a bit of neurosis to feel as if your philosophical way of being is better than someone doing crack. It's not, it's just a different way of expression and you're seeing life only from the lens of what you think it should be, and not what is. I find people smart or not who are just minding their business and being themselves and not trying to change others and the world, more at peace and OK with life more than those looking around trying to change people into being like them. That shows disturbance inside and will reflect in anything they do and will project that unto the world. Your concern is only reflecting me, me, me, and what you want people to be like.

What you're not understanding is that lots of poor or average people also have these traits. They're just not publicized like the above-mentioned. Lots of money usually just magnetize who you were before. Lots of celebrities too are not like that and you'll never hear anything bad about them. You say lots of celebrities......but there are millions more people like these and on a much smaller scale doing horrendous acts to people. You say they are so famous they don't need to resort to trafficking and rape as if these crimes are reserved for unfamous broke people. It's the same as cancer, it doesn't discriminate, hatred doesn't discriminate, racism, none of it matters your background a dis-ease is a dis-ease and it can strike whether you're rich or poor, the same dis-ease; money just makes it easier to do and ln a much larger scale. As far as getting laid, well you're ignorant to why people seek sex and how they use it for self-gratification....itls not about the sex and how easy or hard it is but the relationship one has with sex and how they use it as a tool. Where would the satisfaction come from for Diddy to just have normal sex with women when that's what he did growing up and before he became rich and how us that going to fulfill the perverted fantasies he has. If he wasn't rich and famous he's still be doing the same things just on a much smaller scale and probably abusing his girlfriends and going to jail in and out for domestic abuse. They don't resort to those things, it's who they are inside. The reason you asked these questions is because of how you view money and fame, your relationship to those things. You think they're a free pass, a ticket to become great and successfully doing and being the best version of yourself. Like I'm rich now and can get laid any time I want. Being rich or poor has nothing to do with getting laid or not getting laid, it's the relationship one has with sex that makes the difference. Go look at the poorest neighborhoods and the poorest countries and see how many children are running around.

Women don't have to hunt for sex because women aren't looking for sex. Women are looking to be with men they like and feel something for even if it's casual. Even if it's a one nighter.

Yes, we do, passively. Do you think we just want to have sex with any dude. No, not most women. To find a man we truly want to have sex with is hard. Clubbing and drinking and drugs will make women lay up easier but normally we do hunt but not aggressively and we're not usually looking for sex, just a guy we find attractive to be with and sex might come with that.

Only appears to be. There's a difference with something actually happening and appears to be. Nothing is happening as in NOTHING is appearing to happen. What's happening is nothing. Hehe. I know nuts..

No, there's no one behind those eyes. Where in the body are you located, remember that post. People answered all over the place. How come it was such a challenge to answer. Those that answered here, there and everywhere will still think they're consciously looking out those eyes located on the body but say they are located beyond the body. It's energy at play. What you think you're looking out of is nothing but the seeing energy just seeing and there's a claim that I am seeing. There's not even an I am.

Going up to a female saying hi my name is ( ), and I'd like to get to know you better is kind of corny. Just start up a convo if it's appropriate and just let the conversation flow while introducing yourself in the mix then ask if she's interested in going on a date if that's your intention. Most women won't know how they feel about you at first if you did the initial approaching. Give them a reason, and help them with the decision but not being too forward or pushy. Give her space and room to even know what she wants to do. A little persuasion, yes, if that's the energy and vibe she's giving off, but be playful about it and not show too much aggression. Women don't like aggression, they like assertiveness, some dominance if she's a bit more on the submissive side and confidence in your abilities to show her a good time. Even submissive people, as long as it's not a fantasy role play bsdm type thing, still likes it when the other isn't being overly aggressive and to give some room for them to show some personality but not feel overwhelmed by dominance.

Guys don't have to tell a female when he first meets her that he finds her attractive. That will make it's mark all on it's own. After all, that's the reason you approached her to begin with. If you are just approaching every Susan, Jane and Mary for the sake of just wanting to score with anyone willing, and you're not really attracted to them, well...,,.shame on you!

No. Ever see a computer/machine that types itself. Lots of things are operating without any conscious being behind it. Matter of fact there are no conscious beings, but that's not up for debate because it will get nowhere. I'll just leave that at that.

Exactly, so why do you ask if there is no you who's doing the body.

This was not necessary.