Lyubov

Oh I see, yes good point

Eternally innocent and guilty are added in labels, not wholeness. You are neither innocent or guilty. Why not dissolve what’s there and see what actually is?

I don’t believe there are inherently bad people. All is accepted. That doesn’t mean everyone connects to truth or that everyone doesn’t live out whatever unresolved issues or dysfunctional beliefs they have. Bullying only exists on a hierarchy where one person believes they can be better than another person by acting cruel towards them. They are acting in a way they believe brings them value, but it’s impossible to earn value, you are value, divine. It’s impossible to create a bully if one realizes it is one simply by the very premise of what a bully is.

The reason these gurus say all this shit is because they lack integrity and it’s the reason why half the mystical shit they say contradicts each other. Its half baked shit that’s pure distraction from sitting in the unknown. It’s crazy how so many seekers have chosen to perceive sahdguru as “more awake.” If the guy was posting here people would be mocking him for smocking too much dmt. He is a good guy and I have no bone to pick with him but I definitely don’t look up to or idolize him or think he “knows more than me.” He’s done a good job creating his business though and apparently he does some farming that feeds people in his place in India, so that’s nice.

I agree, I like Sadhguru but I don’t believe in telling white lies and I don’t approve of the hierarchy he creates with his teachings. He’s not my guru, nor do I have one, and I believe guru culture in general is antiquated and limiting for the truly independent.

It was engineered since we have evidence of this, so some aspects of the way they would think are the same as today, but at the same time there was divine knowledge and totally different type of world views. Such a radical world view and belief system then. Who the fuck even knows how radically different it was looking out into the world then. To be transported back then would be like a psychedelic trip. Certain colors probably weren’t even perceived yet with how they saw the world. Who knows what people were capable of with their level of connection to source plus their beliefs.

What was the sort of the big leap though or inflection point that made your passion financially successful though? I would assume the unrelated business which gained you skills that helped monetize your passions played a role as well as the capital, but say I had a reasonably sustainable income source that extends my runway to pursue my passions. What made your passions become financially successful while remaining true to yourself? Or was it just a matter of being responsibly and flexible and sticking with it until it took off and you could grow it. It all unfolded organically ?

How did you attract or learn to make or manifest, whatever words you use, the flow of money align with your passions and interests? I see clearly you love spirituality and learning and teaching. Originally you wanted to do video games and you were earning some money through that but that wasn’t your life purpose or zone of genius. I know what my life purpose is and what my zone of genius is but where I create confusion for myself is aligning it with money, especially as a creative person who perhaps has ideals and values I don’t want to break for money. What do you do to have what you love to do align with money?

It’s a big problem here? Only people I’ve seen who make these mistakes often seem to not really speak English in the first place.

I can relate. I lean towards introvert energy too. I like staying in. I do create some resistance to meeting new people. Thing is it can be fun if you allow it and I think if you come at it without goals but just find a rhythm and nightlife you like (music preference?) it can be much better. Also getting a bit of momentum helps a ton. Once you have some momentum and friends it becomes more fun. Don’t give up.

No one knows. Iran has a massive up hill battle and I believe they face devastating consequences if they over commit. They are better off in a proxy conflict where they can prod for weakness.

This is fucked up and a full scale war in the region is going to not help all the world order tensions.

Relationship with a woman you’re attracted to, for sure. your deepest insecurities will surface and you’ll be able to resolve them. But focusing on your social skills and building up your extroverted side is also great. I’m continually doing this myself. You can do both.

Careful with these comparisons it’s one thing to have insight and see the many differences in the lives of people, communities and countries. It’s another to think one aspect or experience from one applies to or is appropriate for another. Nothing is by coincidence yet everything is unfolding. You could be born into NK and live some life with a severe lack of food and wellbeing. Yet be born into a great community in the USA and the. get shot in the back by some gunman or get cancer.

I wouldn’t ever compare one life to another. I can’t even imagine the unique challenges all you folks on here go through that live in these red/blue places.

I personally don’t really believe in game skills weakening in a relationship. If anything the sex and feminine elevates a man’s energy and the girlfriend effect lifts him 1000x more than grinding pick up. You can easily spot the guys who have done a ton of pick up but haven’t been in an LTR with a really beautiful woman, fallen madly in love. Especially the guys who do pick up decently and do get sex. They lack this finesse and authenticity. Cold hearted. They don’t dress very good either. It’s an entirely different level, get a girlfriend you’re crazy about. That’s the doorway to learning about women deeply if you really want to. You become a sex god too this way.

I don’t really follow this logic though. Considering this is a war and things change. I think the general consensus is for people who support Ukraine is that Ukraine was attacked by another state which is wishing to rebuild their empire and expand their geographic influence into lands they once had control over. This is Ukraine, a nation state fighting for survival while Russia does not really recognize the Ukrainian state and sees them as Russians who have been sort of colonized by post Soviet western forces through military expansion. Russians don’t really recognize Ukrainian sovereignty. They see them as sort of country folk with a different accent but essentially Russian and part of the Russian empire. Russia at face value justifies their invasion as a security risk, NATO expansion up against a geopolitical weak point for the state of Russia, flat land that leads to their capital, however when the one man who chose this war, Putin, speaks his mind he reveals this is actually more of a conquest to regain lands he sees historically as Russia. Rebuild a sort of empire that was destroyed when the Soviet Union fell. In many ways though the identity of the Russian empire has been built a good bit off this geopolitical weakness with all the flat land in Ukraine leading into their Moscow capital, so I do not see this as entirely a lie, there is a point to be made here. I do think there is an element of long term strategic positioning here in terms of wanting to control Ukraine for security for their country.

Anyone done this before? I would consider a 1-2 year online program. Anyone done this? I want for it all to be entirely online and for the work to be as well. Any tips?

How you vote for trump in 2016 then want to shoot him mfer running on the same damn platform

It’s well documented he does not like NATO, does not support Ukraine and doesn’t care what Russia does. You can expect isolationism from him and a petty big shift in USA / European security relations. I already think the damage has largely been done unless some unknown factor / luck influences the Ukraine war in such a way where it revives things.

Well at least this stereotype that all liberal men in America are soy boys who don’t know how to use a gun are starting to be shattered

Sup

The real “enlightened” ones here realize they know nothing. I don’t know shit 😁

This is not a matter of value, it’s a matter of preference. Do not confuse what I’m saying about high body count women as a judgement of their value. It’s a matter of preference that many men share for good reasons.

And I also think this applies to one side more than the other. Bothered by it? Take it up with the creator. We are all different and unique. I’m not crying about having more muscle, the implications and obligations for my own uniqueness, the expectations for me to defend and put my body on the line if there is danger. Let’s not try to just level out the differences in male and female sexuality. My 5’3 120ib ex gonna defend me if there is a war? Way too much denial these days in this. Women putting their bodies up easily for any man are not attractive as long term partners and for good reasons. Men do not want to fully commit to a woman who has been had by a huge amount of men, that number is subjective and depends a lot on culture but it is an observable phenomena. It’s not fair. Life is not fair, it’s fantastic.