-
Content count
2,194 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by r0ckyreed
-
If you want something to happen, you gotta model it yourself. What is your positive insight without coming on here just to argue or judge?
-
Assuming Buddha and Christ actually existed, I agree totally. My issue is that it is really easy to misunderstand the Buddha. If you interpret him as the goal being to eliminating all suffering, then you also eliminate all that is good about life as a natural consequence. That is what I was saying he was wrong about if in fact he meant it in the way I interpreted it. All I am saying is that I realized for myself is that it is okay to feel other emotions besides happiness. It is okay to let yourself feel frustrated when you don’t perform your best. In fact, I suggest that being happy with a poor performance in life is a reinforcer to repeat bad performances. If you are happy doing drugs, you will continue to do them, but if you are mad at yourself for doing them, that could be what you need to bring about a change in you. People can easily turn Buddhism into a trap where they want to let go of all their attachments, desires, and dreams, and strive to have no emotion other than happiness, contentment, and bliss. But the issue is that the Buddha’s teachings on attachment for instance and suffering, don’t seem to me like they apply to the majority of people today. I hear a lot of people say to me that if they followed the Buddha, they wouldn’t care, and that hit me because I realized that the reason why I studied philosophy, and why I excelled at all the things I excelled at were because I cared. I still loved myself and was loved what I did, but my perfectionism showed how much I cared about being good at the skills I cared about. Maybe this is my misunderstanding of Buddha’s teachings and if so, I guarantee I am not alone. For instance, I do agree with Buddha about striving to live in the Now, but the thing is that if you go all the way with any teaching, it will stunt you and become a trap. Living in the Now is always a reality for you whether you are thinking about future or not. All teachings need nuance. Meditation is good, but like I said, at some point you gotta get off the mat and learn how to meditate when you are in the moment of suffering. Suffering is eliminated not by avoiding it and emotional fakery and toxic positivity, but it is rather “eliminated” when you no longer perceive suffering as suffering. That is my take on it at this point anyways. I appreciate your all’s thoughts and feedback so far.
-
It’s gonna mean something to you. That is what matters. I think this is a trap that even Leo warned about. Not all meanings are at equal footing. It is like saying that the Left Wing and Right Wing are both equal footing. But they are not. You can feel inside yourself and determine whether eating junk food or working out is more meaningful. They are both relative but that doesn’t mean junk food is healthy because it is relative. Life is meaningless but you living as a human if you treat it like that, then there is also no reason to breathe. I pointed this out in my Desire Contemplation post. Meaning needs to be constructed to survive in this meaningless universe. Life is meaningless which makes it infinitely meaningful because you can create whatever meaning you truly want. Life is meaningless goes full circle. I think it is important to be careful here with understanding of relativism. Relativism doesn’t mean that everyone is on equal levels. There are degrees. For instance, Hitler was more selfish than Gandhi. Is this just my opinion? Feel inwards and be truthful to yourself. Of course, Hitler won’t introspect truthfully and he will say he is selfless. But that doesn’t mean it is true. Relativism doesn’t mean anything goes. It means something is only true under certain contexts and parameters. Sure you can but be careful what you go for. Remember, this is a post in the personal development thread so while mediocre may be an illusion at highest level, I am talking relativistically here on insights around survival. To say mediocre and success is illusion to average person would derail them not help them. What do you expect lol. We are talking about personal development. And you make it seem like stage orange is a bad thing. You can’t reach the highest stages if you don’t have the basics from other stages mastered. This is a stage Orange thread and that is okay. Even after you awaken at Turquoise or beyond or whatever you wanna call that stage, you gotta be able to bring it back and integrate it with lower stages. Realizing you are God is one thing, but living like God is another. That’s true. It all comes from within. What I mean by satisfaction in this particular thread is more like contentment or complacency, where you are happy where you are at and don’t care about going forward. In a way, that is a low level of satisfaction. A high level would be what I indicate above which is to maximize your creative potential and not just sit around on the couch all day. At some point you gotta put on your shoes and take them off. Balance. I appreciate your all’s feedback and thoughts so far.
-
Being “hot” I assume you are referring to physical body is a facet society/culture has brainwashed upon you as a form of psychic control. All genders struggle with this notion of being “hot.” Heres the reality. It doesn’t matter how your physical body looks in terms of what society thinks. We are all gonna grow old (if we are lucky) and die. Even the hottest people in the world will become the “ugliest.” Everyone will be the same dust in the end. Hot is an illusion. Strive to be mentally hot not body hot because at the end of the day, the quality of your mind is what you have control over. Both your body and mind will decay with time, but the point is to develop yourself and live up to your best. At the end of the day, everyone has insecurities and just realize that you aren’t alone in that. Notice how everyone has insecurities. It is quite normal actually.
-
Yes. I love my time alone. My mind fascinates me more than other people. Social life can be very awkward for me because I only love talking about controversial things and things few people are interested in like philosophy for instance. I’ve always seen obsession and repetitive behaviors as a positive. I have always been obsessed by things that I love. Meditation and doing other activities may be helpful. But I think following your obsession can be good if your obsession is aligned with your heart.
-
If you are going to create an identity out of being Aspergian, it might be a good idea to have another perspective, possibly a mental health counselor/practitioner. Self-diagnosis can be dangerous if you don’t know what your doing. Of course, the diagnosis game is arbitrary. I have Aspergers and ADHD, but I never defined myself by it. I saw myself in a positive light. I was not very social, had trouble communicating, but I loved spending time alone playing with toys and things more than with other children. I still kinda do this today, but with my mind. I know some people who have autism suffer from negative outcomes of being isolated. But for me, I was always labeled as weird by others, but I never cared what they thought because I was more interested in music, tennis, chess, etc. I was also very hyperactive and never knew how to “act” in social situations. But I focused my energy on what I liked rather than social drama. I was obsessed with being the best at whatever I did. I was a perfectionist. I could spend hours doing the same thing over and over again, as repetitive behaviors are a symptom of autism spectrum or aspergers. Today, I am similar. I never had medication. Activities that trained my focus such as tennis, trumpet, chess, magic, etc. were my “medication” that helped me build the skills to manage symptoms and enhance them in positive ways. But remember, you are not a diagnosis. You are unique. However, diagnosis can be a great tool to help you understand how unique you are.
-
r0ckyreed replied to Someone here's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
-
r0ckyreed replied to iboughtleosbooklist's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
The Force is the best description I think of reality. When you say God, people think you are religious and think you are monotheistic. When you say The Force, that captures pantheism and the essence of reality much deeper. Reality isn’t a man in the sky. Reality is The Force, the energy and consciousness in all things. The Force is a better term because God is assumed to be a powerful being, whereas the Force is pure magic with no being. The Force represents pure Love, relative morality, and the embracement of both light and dark sides. Whereas the term God implies an absolute morality. -
Keep it simple. Wake up, eat food, drink water, and then follow whatever lights you up in that moment. If you are grinding through some routine, your mind is gonna be soft. Be creative with your life. Keep it simple. Try doing something completely different. Try not going by routine but go by inspiration for one week. See how your life changes if you go by inspiration instead of grinding. Keep it simple. Do what works. Don’t do what doesn’t work. Discipline means to be a disciple to what you love. Do what you love and you will have energy guaranteed. If not, then there is something physiologically/psychologically wrong or you don’t really love what you are doing. Running and working out gives me energy. Here is the counterintuitive move, to gain energy, you first have to expend energy. If you are working out your body but not your mind, then that is a problem.
-
My mate, the whole point of a morning routine is to energize you for the rest of the day. You don’t need to be doing a 3 hour morning routine. If you fill your morning with a bunch of tasks, your gonna burnout. For me personally, I don’t even have a morning routine per se. I tend to follow my inspiration rather than some rigid routine. Doing something different each day makes new neural connections and activates and engages different parts of the brain than if you are doing same thing each day. If you did 100 push-ups everyday, you wouldn’t grow after a certain point. You have to vary it up and work on different facets. It’s not about how long you meditate, it is about how deep you go. Learn how to meditate deeply in a 10 minute period. Here’s the key thing: Your morning routine should be simple to energize you to get your tasks done. I feel like you use such an extensive routine as a way to procrastinate or prolong doing the tasks required that day. Shorten your routine to 30 minutes. Then tackle the hell out of your main project that day. You attentional capacity and mental resources are limited each day. Use your mind when it is fresh rather than using your prime attention on tasks not required. Can you be energized for the day in less than 30 minutes? 15 minutes? Why 3 hours? I said it all here. Again, your working memory and attention are limited each day. Use your mind when it is fresh. $$$$Again, the whole purpose of a morning ritual is to give you the energy and motivation/inspiration for the rest of the day. If your morning ritual is making you tired, you are doing something wrong.$$$$ Edit: Watch The movie series Rocky. You think Rocky Balboa’s morning ritual takes him long? Keep it simple. Rocky just eats eggs, stretches and goes for a quick run. Good luck.
-
r0ckyreed replied to xAkachan's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Awesome! Thanks for the reading! It was pretty accurate and helpful! -
r0ckyreed replied to WokeBloke's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
You are pretending you are real All others are yourself. Other people aren’t pretending, you are! Why are you pretending? -
r0ckyreed replied to xAkachan's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Here is my thought, I could be wrong: Buttons could symbolize the need for closure, security, comfort, etc. I think of buttons as wanting to cover ourselves up, to put clothes on ourselves. I think the buttons could symbolize that a part of yourself hasn’t been fully explored or realized yet. Hence, your true body is behind your clothes so to speak. Next time you see buttons, take note of your state of mind and situation to see what it means for you specifically. If I saw buttons a lot, that is how I would interpret it most likely. Edit: Why do we button at all? Is there a part of ourselves that we are still insecure about? Maybe that could be what button is pointing towards. -
r0ckyreed replied to xAkachan's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
So glad you have the courage to share your gift with others here. I encourage you to keep practicing your psychic abilities no matter what people say. Not all “truth-realized people” have tapped into their psychic potential. I aspire to develop my psychic abilities in due time! Psychic potential is as important as truth. Truth is something you do for yourself and psychic powers are something you give to others. At least that is my perspective of it as of now. I have taken the Myers-Briggs test many times and I go back-and-forth between INTP-A and INFP-A. I consider my personality to be a deep, critical, and creative thinker. I love my own solitude and love being out in nature. When I am around others, I am initially shy (introverted) at first. Once I am comfortable, I can become the life of the party. The activities I have done and excelled at have been me being a tennis player, magician, chess player, trumpet player, writer, and singer. Everything I desire, I pretty much excel at. Ambition is a strength of mine and perfectionism can be a shortcoming. I have high energy and am hyperactive, engaged, and am humorous depending on the vibe and comfortability I feel in the moment. Not sure if you need any other information. As for a specific reading, I am open to whatever you can read from what I have given you so far. Welcome to the forum! -
The God’s view technique, or view from above as called in stoicism, is about maintaining objectivity even in the hardest moments. A simple fact you can realize in hard times is that you aren’t alone, and suffering is a temporary storm that will pass. It takes practice and it is hard to do this technique while in the moment but with practice you can. It helps me to not be so attached and helps me appreciate how big the universe is and how small my concerns are. i’m not sure if I understand your question, it is really natural to me. All you need is imagination. Imagination is a vital skill that needs to be developed and in survivors of trauma, imagination can become weakened/stunted according to Van Der Kolk. To strengthen your imagination, you need to first practice seeing things in your mind’s eye. Think back to your imagination when you were a child and work from there. Visualization is so powerful that we can either use it to empower ourselves or to make ourselves suffer. Edit: One skill that I’m really good at that I think is one of the most important skills to have is the ability to reframe negative events as positive. The ability to reframe is essential to live a happy life. Without reframe you were at the whims of external circumstances. For instance if you get fired from a job you can see that and reframe that as an opportunity to find a deeper part of yourself that you may have never found. Another is to see you’re suffering from the bigger picture perspective and that there are lessons that can be learned from our previous experiences such as toxic relationships, etc. Reframing is essentially a different perspective on your current dominant narrative. And in narrative therapy we have a dominant narrative which is the story that we tell ourselves. But there are alternative narratives that can contain empowering stories that we sometimes don’t tell ourselves. Alternative narratives look for the unique strengths that we have and then reframe that to our given circumstance. Read up on narrative therapy. I have used it in my work with clients, and it works.
-
Zoom out of your own point of view. Take the view of God. See all the planets, stars, etc. Realize how small your problems are compared to the universe. Realize that nothing matters and it will all be okay. When you take God’s view, you realize you aren’t alone. You can be secure in knowing that everyone is insecure. Start questioning your worry, and realize that no amount of worry can ever change a situation. Worry and anxiety is like a merry-go-round, you are spinning and going nowhere. Distancing is a psychology technique you can use to find insights into your problems. The best way is to always honor and follow your highest inspiration/desire. Do an activity that is fun and that you can engage with like walking or music. I believe Einstein had an insight into general relativity when he was out for a walk. Maybe you will have an insight too! Edit: Find your ideal hobby/coping skill. For me that is walking, meditating, and running. Remember to always follow your highest desire and everything will be okay. Don’t confuse your highest desire with fear. Happiness is a mindset, anxiety/depression is a mindset, and Heaven/Hell are mindsets. What is your mindset? Where did you learn your current mindset from? What is your heart’s desire? See my other posts for more info if this doesn’t make sense.
-
I have been contemplating the nature of desire for a couple hours now from scratch and here is what I have come up with so far. I am still refining my ideas. What is desire? - Desire is the minds capacity, action, and tendency for wanting some thing. - This definition is broad to encompass all forms and levels of desire. - Desire is not as simple as wanting this or that. Desire is the emotional energy that gives birth to all action. Forms of desire: 1. Improvement 2. Maintain 3. Possess 4. Create 5. Destroy 6. Let go 7. Comfort/security 8. approval/recognition/attention 9. Love Levels of desire: 1. shallow vs. deep 2. explicit vs. implicit 3. healthy vs. unhealthy (helpful vs. unhelpful) 4. Conscious vs. unconscious 5. authentic vs. inauthentic (important one here) 6. self vs. other (desire for yourself and for other) 7. Central vs. peripheral desires Was Buddha Wrong? Desire and attachment have overlap but aren’t the same. If you have absolutely no desires, you would be dead. To survive is to desire. Think of every action you take as a desire. You could even think of each cell of your body as having a desire to survive and maintain the systems of your body. Desire is not always conscious. Desire is the foundation for everything. To even use your energy to sit down and meditate needs desire. Life cannot be lived without some form of desire. There is even a certain desire in detaching from attachments. Why detach at all? The key difference between attachment and desire is that not all desire is attachment. Attachment is a shallow form of desire that is clingy and holds onto things, whereas a more broader or healthier desire is about being fluid and flexible in the ability of letting go. Liberation from suffering is having the right priorities and healthy desires put in place. Liberation is holistic, which means that all different forms and levels of desires need to be integrated. You don’t just have one desire. You have multiple desires that can often be competing with each other. I call these conflicting desires. Contemplate all the conflicting desires you have. Here are some of mine: 1. Desire to be physically fit vs. desire to eat junk food. 2. Desire to be ambitious/disciplined vs. desire to be lazy/playful 3. Desire for solitude vs. desire to socialize 4. Desire to be outdoors vs. indoors 5. Desire to detach from media vs. desire to remain attached. 6. Desire to meditate vs. desire to go to bars We also have a desire-center and desire-periphery. Desire-center is when desire is at the forefront of your attention, which is not always your most healthiest desire. Desire-periphery are all the other desires in the background that can compete with desire-center. Distraction is when inauthentic, shallow, and unimportant desires take up the space in the desire-center. The highest peace is the highest desire. When Dumbledore and Harry Potter were at the Mirror of Erised (I noticed this is desire backwards :D), Dumbledore says “The happiest man on earth can look into the mirror and see only himself exactly as he is.” The Mirror represents our deepest desire. The happiest person desires nothing but to see reality exactly as it is, to become one and whole with it. Dumbledore also warns Harry not to “dwell on dreams and forget to live.” Unhealthy desire turns into obsession, which could lead into suffering. You can even see the importance of desire portrayed in other pop culture films such as Aladdin (Genie lamp), Pirates of Caribbean (Jack’s compass), Bruce Almighty, Bedazzled, and others. The key is a lot of people seem to be misguided on what they truly want. You may desire fame or money or drugs or whatever, but is that what you truly desire? Introspection skill is a must here. An important part of the process is sorting out authentic vs inauthentic desires. The inauthentic can lead to a lot of suffering. Whereas, authentic desires can lead us to more freedom. Desire is not the enemy. Desire is rather the foundation and essence for life itself and living up to your full potential. The highest desire goes full circle into detachment and acceptance. Detachment isn’t a lack of desire, but rather the lack of putting emotional investment and identification in things/events. What do you all think? Was the Buddha wrong about desire being the cause of suffering? Let me know!
-
r0ckyreed replied to r0ckyreed's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Desire is the essence of the Rocky Balboa lifestyle. Rocky Balboa isn’t just a movie, it is a way of life. Desire + discipline = ambition ambition + time = success/growth -
What is the difference between intuition and heuristic and logic? How can you tell the difference? What is the best method for deriving knowledge and making decisions? Heuristic definition from Wikipedia: A heuristic, or heuristic technique, is any approach to problem solving or self-discovery that employs a practical method that is not guaranteed to be optimal, perfect, or rational, but is nevertheless sufficient for reaching an immediate, short-term goal or approximation. Intuition definition from Wikipedia: Intuition is the ability to acquire knowledge without recourse to conscious reasoning. Logic definition from Wikipedia: Logic is the study of correct reasoning or good arguments. It is often defined in a more narrow sense as the science of deductively valid inferencesor of logical truths. One of the perks of logic and rationality is that you can follow your chain of reasoning from the conclusions asserted. Whereas, with intuition and heuristics, conclusions are made with no apparent chain of reasoning. If you cannot track your train of thought, then how can you know if you are using intuition, genuine knowing without conscious reasoning, or heuristic, which is a mental short cut based on our biases. Intuition I think is a form of mental shortcut, so how does it really differ from heuristics? With heuristics, you can be quite convinced and can confuse them with intuition. For example, if you meet someone and have a strange feeling about them, is that intuition or heuristic being played there? Is your feeling grounded in what is true or is it biases you have picked up from the social matrix? Logic, on the other hand, can track chains of thoughts to help us pinpoint inconsistencies in our chain of thinking. Logic is a second-order phenomenon to senses/experience/consciousness. You might say that logic cannot be reliable because you can logic anything and can arrive at different conclusions. For instance, you may say that Christians are using logic to justify their beliefs and so are atheists. But is that really so? Or are you conflating logic and heuristics together? When someone justifies their beliefs, that is a fallacy (error in logic) and heuristic. Remember, logic is a way of thinking objectively about a situation, arriving at a conclusion through a chain of reasoning. If something in the chain of reasoning is incorrect, then your conclusion is likely to be incorrect because of a flawed foundation. An issue with logic is that your conclusion can be correct, but your reasoning to get there can be wrong in the same way that you can get the right answer to a math problem but not employ the right methods. This matters because of consistency. If you get the right answers by cheating off someone else (like believing in pastor without reading the Bible and thinking for yourself), then you never develop cognitive autonomy and strength for every day life decision-making. When it comes to the test (we all get different forms), you won’t be able to do crap because of the method used in this example. Logic is a method for following your train of thought that enables one to be able to detect errors in thinking (fallacies) and be able to make decisions without being influenced by emotions. With heuristics (and possibly intuition?), they seem to be heavily influenced by our biases and emotions, so we cannot fully trust them. Emotions are like weather and are inconsistent, which is why we can’t rely on them to make decisions. Logic helps us keep ourselves honest and to avoid our emotions from clouding our judgment, as we can see if heuristics. I have a sense that intuition transcends logic, but I am unsure how, if at all, intuition can transcend heuristics and biases? Edit: Another issue with logic is that multiple conclusions and contradictory conclusions can be arrived at with valid reasoning. In that case, the method of logic does not always arrive us all to the same conclusions, so this is also an inevitable issue with the system of logic and the human mind, but logic is still valuable because it helps us track our train of thought instead of taking mental shortcuts through emotional decision-making. You could argue that every decision-making is an emotional decision-making. But what I am saying is going that extra step to think things through and question your decisions to see behind their influence, which is an exceptional skill to have in society today. What do you think about all this? What is the difference between intuition and heuristics, and logic? Which method is a better way of making decisions in everyday life? Intuition I think is a form of mental shortcut, so how does it really differ from heuristics?
-
How do you tell whether it is intuition or heuristic/bias?
-
r0ckyreed replied to r0ckyreed's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
The way I use desire is a broad idea that encompasses the energy to do something. I feel like the Buddha used desire to mean wanting something that you don’t have now. But that to me is a limiting view of desire because not all desire is focused on what you don’t have already. We often forget about the desires to maintain and create/destroy. Can you really create without some form, conscious or unconscious form of desire? Desire to me is the energy, motivation, and will to do something. In the flow state, I am flowing am often flowing towards something as opposed to grinding against something. For instance, I can work out and flow with that and I can do schoolwork and flow with that. When I flow with something, I do not desire anything beyond what I am doing. But that to me doesn’t mean desire is not present. To exercise and to do schoolwork, to exert any energy what so ever to me comes down to a certain level and quality of desire. Why choose exercise over TV? We make choices all the time and it is motivated by a certain desire in that moment I think. I think I am in the flow state most often when I am following my desires fully. If you are doing what you don’t really want to do, it can be hard to go in flow with that. But what helps me get into flow is following my passion/desire at any given moment. Yeah. Reflexes are very interesting. I think that desire is such a deep topic, much deeper than we would normally think. I think our body and all of our cells have desires in a way. For instance, you may desire to stop drugs, but your body could still be desiring them. White blood cells also go after germs to preserve immune system. But you bring a good point on whether it is just an automatic process or a will/desire. The issue is where do we draw the line between reflex and desire, or are they one? Without the homeostasis that is happening at a bodily level, then we could not desire and live I guess you could say. We naturally have an inclination to pursue pleasure and avoid pain. The stove situation could be a form of unconscious desire. It is not you consciously will to pull your hand away, it is just that the body itself has an inclination and will to survive. I think the energy of the current/flow is the energy of desire. Desire not in the sense of wanting something that you don’t have, but desire in the sense of energy, motivation, and ambition. Desire and satisfaction can be compatible with each other. When they aren’t working together, suffering arises. What I am saying is that even to act, to move your body, to move into comfort/discomfort, refraining from impulses, discipline, and even to breathe has its roots in desire. There is a difference to what you may desire and what your body may desire. I call these conflicting desires. You might consciously desire not to close your eyes when an object is close like my finger, but another part of your mind unconsciously desires to close your eyes because a part of your mind doesn’t trust fully. It doesn’t matter if you try to convince your mind that nothing will harm the eye, your eye will close when my finger comes close. At least until you begin doing classical/operant conditioning. This is where I disagree with Peter Ralston and Buddha. Not all desire is about the future. This can be the difference between desiring to get an A and a desire to learn for its own sake. Or the desire to beat your own time at running vs. the desire just to go for a run, be present, and have fun. I think both of these cases are forms of desire at the root. What do you think? -
r0ckyreed replied to r0ckyreed's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I am currently reading How To Think Like Sherlock Holmes by Maria Konnikova. One thing that has stood out to me so far is her section on The Two M’s: Mindfulness and Motivation. She states that research supports that motivated students outperform. Motivation was found to generalize to academic performance, fewer criminal convictions, better employment outcomes, and an overall life satisfaction. The concept of “rage to master” coined by Ellen Winner describes the internal/intrinsic motivation and desire to master a specific domain. People with a rage to master, which is a desire for mastery were found to be more successful than controls. In general, people who are motivated most outperform. Motivation and desire are linked. Desire is linked to growth and success. If you don’t desire growth, how can you grow? Suffering to me is the lack of desire, lack of motivation. Can acceptance and motivation/desire be compatible with each other?? Desire to me is like water for a flower. The flower needs water to live and grow, but it needs a certain quality and amount of water for the balance of its life and growth. Balance is health. Either extreme of water/desire can be unhealthy. It’s like the Buddha said with The Middle Way, neither self-indulgence nor self-denial. -
r0ckyreed replied to r0ckyreed's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Awesome! I like that. Most definitely. My claim is that as long as you are surviving, you cannot fully escape bias and ego. Ego and bias are essential to survival and what makes “you” unique. Maybe I am not understanding what desirelessness is. I guess I am associating desirelessness with apathy and depression. Whereas desire I associate with passion and excitement in striving towards goals. Happiness to me is finding content, gratitude, and satisfaction with the present moment as it is. A higher form of happiness could be also filled with the energy of passion and excitement towards the present moment. How do you attain desirelessness without desiring for it? Maybe desirelessness is more like acceptance rather than a lack of desire? -
r0ckyreed replied to r0ckyreed's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
I appreciate your perspective. I would say Buddha was partly right. Suffering is a natural part of life. I see life more like an adventure than as a torture chamber like Buddha may have seen it. Life as an adventure implies challenge and delight. Desire gives us something to look forward towards and helps us be able to bear our suffering. Desire and meaning I think are connected. But there are desires that can lead us away from our true desire. Viktor Frankl’s book is good for illustrating importance of desire, meaning, and perception. To me, it isn’t all desire that causes suffering, but rather our perception and frame of mind when things don’t go our way. Things not going our way is inevitable, but suffering can be optional for how we process experience. Suffering to me is dissatisfaction and lack of desire like apathy. It is vital to me to live a passionate life. When I am full of passion, I am most at peace in my experience. I think it all comes down to the quality of our desires. Attachment and craving could be seen as low level desires. Whereas passion and meaning can be high quality desires - the difference between hedonism and eudaimonia. For your last question, your mind creates wrong and imperfection out of perfection which is a reason for suffering. A suffering mind creates problems, apathy, etc., and a peaceful mind creates solutions, meaning, and passion/desire. There is nothing wrong with suffering. If there is, then that is the suffering! What do you think? -
r0ckyreed replied to r0ckyreed's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Thanks mate. Glad I got you thinking. ❤️? Good question. I would suggest that true acceptance also includes acceptance of thoughts. Thinking is a natural part of mind. Deep acceptance may lead to deep silence, but that is because thinking is also accepted for what it is as well. I believe thinking is a good thing, but thinking is often demonized just like desire in part because the negative aspects are generalized. I find quietude in my mind when I am able to accept my thoughts for what they are. My struggle is that I can’t maintain no-mind for very long because that is when I get really creative thoughts and insights. That is just my experience at least.