Thought Art

@Raf sounds like HCL not freebase to me You want to vape the freebase It should mostly vapourize cleanly and smell sweet.

@Yimpa We are not a match ⚠️

@Princess Arabia Me, I’m the most normalist there is 😉🌅

Stop sharing Mr.Girl here

The more I spoke to it the more relaxed it became. But, it warns me to make sure I study diverse schools of knowledge. Which I agree with. After rewatching his interview with Kurt, Leo knows a lot… but, he also doesn’t. The biggest thing that stuck out to me was his stuff around spiritual healers. Trying to explain how they fit into his model even though their practices don’t provide reliable results. He teaches self deception, but yet a healer claiming he says demons and entities when there aren’t any isn’t self deceived? Found that tricky. You know, at the end of the day you must stand alone and keep learning. Embrace not knowing and develop an epistemological humility and maturity.

Tonight I am studying my Google Cyber Security course. I was a little confused over some of the course material. I decided to ask ChatGPT some questions. I then realized I am now able to chat with chatGPT 3.5 using voice, and it speaks back to you using a very human manner. I began speaking to it more and more like I would a human. I started by telling it about what I was learning. I asked for clarification on definitions, and what words meant within those definitions. It explained what Routing and addressing is in networks, which at first I didn't understand what it meant. It used a metaphor to explain to me what routing was using cars and traffic in a street. Then I asked it is it like this other metaphor? It said "Yes, that is a good metaphor". I was able to zoom in and out of the concepts I as was creating a mind map between the concepts in the module. I was able to ask it questions to test my understanding. An important part of rapid learning and skill acquisition is immediate feedback. ChatGPT can also be used to test your knowledge against the best data sets we have on particular areas of study. Don't let AI rot your brain, use it to become super intelligent.. It's a really useful study tool. As I read through this modules glossary to review they key terms and concepts ChatGPT voice is a human way of asking powerful questions, gaining clarity. What I also like about the AI is that it doesn't judge you, it's infinitely patient, you can tell it directly to adjust it's way of responding, you can, ask it the same question a million times until you understand. It is meant to be a tool, not another ego. It has no preferences on what you speak about like a human would. Most humans are mentally lazy with limited time, interest and understanding in a particular topic. But this need not be an issue with the AI to the extent of it's data sets. You can potentially carry on high level conversations with this AI and learn a lot about particular fields of study. It could be a tool that rapidly increases peoples learning, comprehension, understanding, depth of understanding, quality and amount of connection pathways, etc. With the right map of AI prompts AI can be used to learn practical philosophy and inquiry into fields of interest. There are also potential implications for using AI for self help. It can be a great partner when reading self help material, watching lectures, doing practices etc. AI should also be somehow integrated with a common place book. You could use common place book exercises, and collection creation with the aid of a voice AI. When using voice AI your hands are free to think and writing/ create. This is another decent advancement in that it helps humans overcome a bottlenecking issue with both information input and output. I asked Chatgpt about it's programming. I wanted to know how the creators managed to make it feel so human. I found it's response interesting to learn about. It sort of tricks my brain into thinking this is a person with a personality. The programmers managed to create a very human, warm, intelligent feeling personality that you are interacting with. This stands in a stark contrast to the typical robotic feel that comes with our general assumptions of AI. Very Cool!

@Carl-Richard That’s tough. It doesn’t explicitly say he is a menace. But, warns people. It’s extremely biased against him. It has biases towards science and varified facts. It wants to keep people safe. It’s Microsoft’s security protocols that do it. Chatgpt3.5 seems to be more relaxed it is sort of sad

Chatgpt4 does not like Leo, it won’t draw him or discuss him. It only provides warning.

@Yimpa Flesh light and chat gpt

@An young being I may not use it

I’m sure CHATGPT4 is great. But, it’s slow and clunky on bing. I really don’t like bing. It feels congested, clunky, scammy.

Wow ChatGPT 4 has a waaaay larger data parameter I was asking it about itself chatgpt4 ChatGPT4 and ChatGPT3.5 are two versions of a natural language generation tool developed by OpenAI. They can both generate text based on user input, but they have some key differences in their capabilities, performance, and features. Here are some of the main differences between them: - ChatGPT4 is the latest and most advanced version of the tool, while ChatGPT3.5 is the previous version that is still available for free². - ChatGPT4 uses GPT-4, a language model with 1.6 trillion parameters, while ChatGPT3.5 uses GPT-3.5, a language model with 175 billion parameters¹. Parameters are the parts of a language model that define its skill on a problem such as generating text¹. - ChatGPT4 can generate text, images, and voice, while ChatGPT3.5 can only generate text². ChatGPT4 can also create images by describing them in text, using the DALL·E 3 model². - ChatGPT4 can use and build custom GPTs for specific purposes, such as creative writing, math tutoring, or game time². ChatGPT3.5 can only use the general-purpose GPT-3.5 model. - ChatGPT4 has a better context window and context size than ChatGPT3.5⁵. A context window is how much data a model can retain in its "memory" during a chat session and for how long⁵. ChatGPT4 can remember more information and for longer than ChatGPT3.5.. Source: Conversation with Bing, 2023-12-08 (1) ChatGPT - OpenAI. https://openai.com/chatgpt. (2) GPT-4 vs. ChatGPT-3.5: What’s the Difference? | PCMag. https://www.pcmag.com/news/the-new-chatgpt-what-you-get-with-gpt-4-vs-gpt-35. (3) GPT-4 vs. GPT-3.5: 5 Key Differences Explained - MUO. https://www.makeuseof.com/gpt-4-vs-gpt-35-differences-explained/. (4) ChatGPT 4 vs ChatGPT 3.5 - Major Key Differences. https://www.kommunicate.io/blog/chatgpt-4-vs-chatgpt-3-5-key-differences/. (5) How Does ChatGPT-3.5 Compare to GPT 4? An Insightful Guide - Emeritus. https://emeritus.org/in/learn/chatgpt-3-5-vs-gpt-4/. (6) en.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPT-4.

@An young being oh cool I’ll take a look. I know chatgpt4 is more robust in its logic and output capacity. As of right now I’m using it as a study tool to ask it deeper questioned based on the course materials. Mostly definition and text based questions as I know it doesn’t do math well. Chatgpt3.5

@An young being Is it the same AI?

Here is ChatGPT 4 video differences

I need to learn more about the AI. i know ChatGPT 3.5 isn’t as good at Chatgpt4 when it comes to difficult logic problems. This video I saw discusses the differences and limitations of 3.5. (

@Carl-Richard I am reading your shared article but also noting it is aged and based on old datasets and versions of the AI.

@Carl-Richard To me it’s been mostly accurate, and is well internet intentioned. It gives robust and nuanced answers, and often points out traps and considerations to look out for when using the information provided. The datasets are likely vetted. They likely are refining this thing all the time through user usage, and their own desire to create a good product. Which it is. No, it can be used for more than a directory. It can be if that’s how use want to use it. But, you can also speak to it. You can be creative in how you use it. You can dive deep on subjects and refine its answers. You can learn from it, and contemplate with it. I think it’s a skill you can develop.

@An young being I am using the free ChatGPT.

I guess, what we want are more robust, more accurate data sets, with increased power of the AI itself.

Okay, but just to your first paragraph. I was wondering how it learned what it knows. I think that because it’s basically using information from the internet up until 2022… it’s as correct as the internet is, according to its data sets up until that point. It makes no sense to me why people think it would be wrong “reliably” when so far it seems reliably accurate. The prompts you give it are important. Its ability to structure responses is really nice. You can ask it to adjusts its approaches etc. You can also question it when it’s wrong and it sometimes corrects itself and even will add a more nuanced answer if that is more appropriate. I don’t have stats on accuracy I will admit. But, the tool is very helpful. Here are reasons for when it makes errors: Chatgpt: The accuracy of my responses primarily depends on the quality and relevance of the data available up to my last update in January 2022. There are several reasons why I might provide incorrect information: 1. Outdated Information: My knowledge is up to date until January 2022. If there have been new developments or changes after that, my information might be outdated. 2. Misinterpretation of Context: Sometimes, I may misinterpret the context or intent of a question, leading to an inaccurate response. 3. Incomplete Information: I might lack comprehensive or specific details on certain topics, which could result in incomplete or inaccurate answers. 4. Biased Data or Misinformation: The data used for training may contain biases or inaccuracies present in the original sources, leading to potentially incorrect outputs. 5. Limitations in Understanding: I may not fully grasp complex or nuanced subjects and could provide oversimplified or misleading information. While I strive to offer accurate information, it's always advisable to verify important details from multiple reliable sources, especially for critical decisions or matters requiring the most current information.

@Carl-Richard sorry, I need to reframe my approach to this thread. Will reply differently soon

If it was some dumb AI full of errors it wouldn’t be the success that it is. It’s the worst it will ever be. It’s learning fast.

@Carl-Richard You assume how false it is but don’t know. It seems to understand context pretty well as well. Again, it’s a tool and it’s often NOT wrong in my experience. Many of your academic papers from peers are often wrong therefore your other AI is also likely wrong. You’re not gonna get perfect and you should use a keen discernment and multiple sources. That’s obvious. But for cyber security I am cross referencing course material with the AI. Cyber security is not like other fields. It applied science and engineering and is well catalogued and understood. It alignés with what google is saying as a studying tool. I’m not an academic. I’m doing a technical job.

@Carl-Richard Interesting, that is useful to know about that AI as well. So far, chatgpt is very high quality. It was matching what the notes were saying from Google courses anyway. I was comparing what it said to what Google was saying. They seem aligned but worded differently. I am not doing a lot of academic writing at this time. But, using it as a tool to improve my understanding. I am sure there are errors in all AI to some degree. But, I suspect that to be a rapidly shrinking % as it continue to learns from have thousands of prompts every minute.