-
Content count
1,165 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by TrynaBeTurquoise
-
Oh the irony
-
Honestly if you are very physically active I wouldn't worry about having the carbs to break your fast. Its not like you blood sugar is gonna do a huge spike and crash from oats since they are slow digesting. Especially if you do some sort of fasted workout some days the carbs to break your fast will be useful. I would say definitely include a significant amount of protein in that meal though, and above all observe how well you are able to digest it and your energy levels afterward. Overall its about finding something that is working for you and isn't bogging down your metabolic processes too much where you don't have the energy for cognition or doing what you want to after that first meal. Also its not like you are getting up first thing in the morning and eating carbs, its after your daily fast which gives your body than chance to tap into the fat burning. Some form of caffeine in that fast should be helpful as well but also monitor how that is working for you.
-
@LfcCharlie4 Well, keeping it as simple and general as possible imo. Could do many many ways but these are what have worked for me when I wanted to cut up: 1. Engage in exercise regularly with proper intensity/frequency to challenge metabolism and get good adaptations 2. Maximize Sleep + Keep Sleep/Wake Cycles Consistent 3. Minimize All Forms of Unnecessary Stress 4. Eat the cleanest diet possible (highest nutrient density to lowest processed foods) 5. Do Intermittent Fasting with a very moderate calorie deficit, not starving yourself. Some Re-Feed Days maybe once a week in a surplus would be useful (higher carb as well). This eating could be done intuitively as well just by consuming more protein/fats less carbs than usual 6. Use Ketosis as a tool at the beginning of the day for prolonged steady energy and introduce carbs after workout induced insulin spike later in the day (B Greenfield Style) 7. Strategically use metabolism raising/fat mobilizing properties of caffeine+ Do light to moderate physical activity in the morning before breaking fast +utilize Cold Thermogenesis as a tool (Strike/Stroll/Shiver method) 8. Do breathwork/meditation +other things that make you happy/give you purpose every day
-
I see you flexin
-
Excellent post!! People don't realize how important raising your metabolism is. And anyone who still wants to reap the benefits of fasting while trying to raise or keep a high metabolism should not do calorie-restricted fasting, you want to consume all your normal or surplus of calories within the eating window. Also eating those veggies with goitrogens can still be doable if you cook them instead of eating them raw.
-
@LfcCharlie4 @DrewNows @Serotoninluv Thoughts on this study?
-
Haha yes, Wim Hof method everyday is a must. You don't see the profit-free disease curing health practices on the media The rings can go hand and hand with that, can install on the right horizontal tree branch.
-
TrynaBeTurquoise replied to GreenWoods's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
"Aliens interfering with human affairs would be like college students doing the schoolwork for a bunch of third graders. Mankind needs to go through the growing pains of evolution themselves" -Paul Chek (paraphrased) -
@LfcCharlie4 I haven't been able to get my hands on a barbell/plates since the shutdown. Frustrating but I have adapted and made progress strength wise and have attacked many other areas with great workout stimulus. I've been posting a lot about how the best price investment you can make right now is gymnastic rings. Can do beginner to extremely advanced exercises, lot of room for overload. And then flat and hill sprinting give you that top speed to plyometric/strength stimulus.
-
As opposed to keeping it in? Wise
-
Looking at that study, the majority of those adverse effects are in "convincingly supports" and more in "favors acceptance". Even in the footnotes if some connects among those with some type of health condition already.
-
@Serotoninluv I would just like to say I have not ever been or am now a militant anti-vaxer. I do think they have some application. And I'm not suggesting vaccine=autism. I think there is a vast dismissal in the mainstream of even the possibility they can cause autism, which imo is highly corrupt and irresponsible. Autism is just one negative on the whole spectrum of negatives where the cons outweighs the pros in many cases. My whole beef is with potential 'mandatory' (they may or may not be) vaccinations for healthy adults, specifically referring to Covid.
-
I appreciate you carefully reviewing what I posted. Keep in mind I posted a very small % of the compilation of research articles, and autism is just one out of many many study categories. From what I've researched, there are significant conflicts of interests in vaccine studies. Consider that there aren't more of these statistically significant causations for a reason.
-
Thats simply false. Most of the studies do indeed talk about vaccinations.
-
I literally registered and got access to the library within less than a minute. Its funny you think you are contributing to something sinister just by registering for access. But okay, I'm only going to send you links to studies referencing the autism issue: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0946672X17308763 https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc1708223 https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/140/2/e20171419 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0946672X16304400 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12011-017-1002-6 https://www.nature.com/articles/nrn.2016.41 https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00003/full https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26218563 https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr087.pdf https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4637446/ https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2015/573701/ http://web.archive.org/web/20160703183407/http://issuesinmedicalethics.org/index.php/ijme/article/view/2132/4596 http://www.soundchoice.org/scpiJournalPubHealthEpidem092014.pdf http://www.oapublishinglondon.com/article/1368 https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laneur/article/PIIS1474-4422(13)70299-0/fulltext?elsca1=ETOC-NEUROLOGY&elsca2=email&elsca3=J34S35F http://www.najms.org/article.asp?issn=1947-2714;year=2014;volume=6;issue=1;spage=41;epage=47;aulast=Kern https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0162013413001773 https://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/132/4/631.full https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jt/2013/801517/ http://people.csail.mit.edu/seneff/Entropy/entropy-14-02227.pdf There are many, many more where that came from.
-
Haha, no I'm not interested in playing the game of scientism with you. And thats precisely what it is, its a game. In that research library is a plethora of peer-reviewed studies by experts in the field that show harm in vaccines. If you don't want to hunt through it, I could care less. But its all there. Linking me more research doesn't negate the validity of the research I provided you with. Yeah, the vast majority of scientific research around vaccines is bunk dude. Vaccine companies do their own research for crying out loud, wake up. Again, I disagree so I'm just going to end my participation in this fruitless effort.
-
Dude, at least try to put in some effort. Its in the research library, its all there. You have to register to access but its free.
-
Again, I disagree. There is plenty of scientific evidence that shows the limitations of that pro-vaccine research. Let me just drop this here: https://vaxxter.com/
-
Disagree with you there bud. I too do not have the time or patience or need to list all the problems behind those peer-reviewed studies. I have done plenty of research on the topic. And yes, they are medical experts. No one is denying the existence of pathogenic microbes. And of course some vaccines may have to be administered intravenously, but not all the ones that are need to be.
-
I am aware of the significance of the word theory. However, this is a nuanced issue. I have heard various medical experts explain why germ theory has never been proven. Regardless, the topic at hand is vaccinations. And there is so much evidence out there of the government cover ups of their dangers, and their correlation to autism. Vaccine companies are the least regulated out of all other drugs and the companies are allowed to do their own research. Fox guarding the henhouse. And they are controlling what is being taught in the education systems to a large extent. Vaccines can also be administered orally which is safer than intravenously but our medical paradigm fails to make that switch. Vaccines may have some application. But a mandatory vaccination for healthy people around this Covid flu is a violation of human rights.
-
Precisely With all the discussions of "paradigm bias" on this forum, its amazing how people are trapped into the faulty allopathic medicine paradigm. And thats what it is, it has never been and never will be proven as truth, its called germ theory for a reason. People who move society and the evolution of humanity forward are the ones who challenge the status quo because they realize they have been fed lies.
-
This is false and misinformation.
-
Everyone needs to watch this:
-
Exactly.
-
This is what you are taught to believe but I respectfully disagree that this is true. After digging deep into the origins of polio, I discovered it was originally heavy metal poisoning before it was classified as a 'deadly virus'. https://leifgrunseth.com/18-things-dont-know-polio-virus-lie/