Raze

Reports are indicating he has died

Right, you are delusional to the point where you think people protesting against slaughter of civilians are equal to someone who brags about shooting unarmed civilians because he’s in “survival mode”. Ironically you are worse than the worst hamas supporters, as you excuse murders done by the occupiers who live lives of privilege in America and Europe who travel to Israel to shoot fathers trying to retrieve bodies of their sons, whereas they defend murders by the occupied population born in a ghetto.

Reports are he is alive but in critical condition. Apparently shots to the necks actually do have high survival rates if you get medical care fast enough. So he may make it.

There is a video that shows it up close, it looks really really bad, I would be shocked if he survives.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/09/the-gaza-family-torn-apart-by-idf-snipers-from-chicago-and-munich

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/sep/09/the-gaza-family-torn-apart-by-idf-snipers-from-chicago-and-munich

she posted a response on Instagram. What annoys me about her is how contradictory so many of her takes were. I followed her on Instagram for a while now and she basically takes one point and runs with it for a few weeks while dismissing everyone who disagrees with it. But multiple times she completely contradicts herself. Like for a while she was roasting men for feeling relationship insecurity or jealous at all, but a few months later she went on a binge about how real men have protective jealousy. She’s also said women don’t like promiscuous men (ironic), but later was talking about how girls like players. I suspect it’s partially because she’s a westernized Muslim woman. From what I have seen they have tendencies to have extremely contradictory preferences as a result of the two different conditionings. Such as in Muslim cultures if a man isn’t protective of his wife and concerned about the men she hangs out with he’s seen as lame and uncaring, whereas in western cultures a man having any possessiveness at all is what is lame and he should be totally non-needy.

Putting aside the alleged crimes, I really dislike him. - he bashes everyone else in the space, yet his actual advice is just bare bones hustle culture and PUA advice that’s been out for years, so while he bashes the people who created and developed it he pretends it’s all his genius wisdom. Meanwhile he isn’t even adding anything besides his trolling and posturing to the already basic advice (he doesn’t explain it well either). - he purposefully makes inflammatory comments and jumps from trend to trend burning each one down as he goes, gets him all the attention he wants but damages every cause he claims to care about. - basically benefits from creating the manosphere arch villain persona while becoming an easy stereotype for feminists / the left to caricature all the issues he associates with and dismiss them making it much harder for anyone else to advocate for them.

I’m not saying resistance won’t always exist. But the point is resistance is less if the transition is done smoother. Saudi Arabia is a good example, outside pressure to liberalize it has faced much less resistance than say when it was done to Afghanistan. Another example, in the US there was always resistance to immigration, but it dramatically increased when images of huge amounts of people streaming into the border illegally circulated.

The reactionary movements aren’t just because things are progressing. The reaction is so intense and hostile precisely because stage green has failed to properly replace the systems being deconstructed. White supremacy - this is one of the better examples of a replacement as it was replaced with individualism and collective bargaining, still that encourages racial identitarianism and victim Olympics as such racial advocacy becomes the path to power and resources. We see this in the BLM riots and hysteria which partly lead to a reemergence of white identitarianism. Patriarchy - because this wasn’t properly replaced the lack of restraints lead to loss of patriarchal structures that controlled sexual behavior and relationships, leading to a rise in fatherlessness, hook up culture, and an imbalance dating market that spurs reactionary movements. Capitalism - to be fair, stage green does have structural proposals for replacements here that could actually work, they’ve just failed to get them implemented so we get crony capitalism and insane income inequality alongside hollowing out of rural America and the middle class, leading to predictable economic populism and ire at targets like immigrants. The capitalists can also exploit the newly fermented divisions in race and gender to these ends.

Yes, they began first building illegal settlements as early as 1967. The West Bank Palestinians were so passive they took the abuse with barely a reaction for decades, finally there was a reaction with the first intifada which israel responded with far more violence. Then when israel still refused to truly engage in peace instead using lies and games to make it seem like the Palestinians were the rejectionists to push for endless occupation did the suicide bombings happen.

Hitler wasn’t honest, behind closed doors he was, but he tried it hide it from the world. Zionists can’t do that as well due to modern media, so they have to brainwash themselves. The only thing that allows zionists to destroy Palestine is US support, all it would take is one phone call from the president to put an end to it. That’s why I don’t think they’ll destroy the Palestinians, because opinions against them have shifted around the world for every group, it’s really a matter of can they finish the job in the next 8-16 years as the elderly demographic that most supports them loses their influence.

Yes, the PA not only stopped fighting israel but helps crush Palestinians trying to resist the destruction of their people, No South African rebel group ever went that far to placate apartheid. Israel’s response is to ramp up violence and theft even more. Did any Israeli care that more children died in the west bank by September 2023 that year than since the second intifada by their doing? No. Yet the want the whole world to care about Israelis killed on Oct 7. The idea israel just wants peace and if Palestinians lay down their weapons their will be peace is a complete lie. Their definition of peace is Palestinians are a subjugated people who they can brutalize at whim for all eternity. The only language israel understands is violence, economic cost, and sometimes shame. At no point in Israel’s history have they ever relented their expansion unless they faced a large amount of this, and even then it was usually a ploy to expand the brutality elsewhere. Israelis always say “Arabs only understand force”, it is complete projection.

Correct, Palestinians largely lived in peace with Jews in Palestine prior to Zionism. The Hebron massacre was in response to zionists marching with weapons chanting the country was theirs, as bad as it was it small in comparison to the hundreds of massacres of Palestinians by zionists since then. One massacre does not justify another, let alone hundreds. They are literally carrying out pogroms every week in the West Bank, and all you are interested in is going back 90 years, ignoring all context, and complaining about bias.

I like how every example you brought up was after zionists had already begun colonizing Palestine and you clearly didn’t even read your post since it even mentions how some examples were in reaction to Zionist terrorist attacked. None of this compares to the constant mass murder and pogroms Israelis have inflicted on Palestinians in the past 90 years either which you don’t mention. One example being during the civil war you mention before any Arab army invaded Zionists already killed thousands of Palestinian civilians and expelled hundreds of thousands.

https://truthout.org/articles/house-republicans-investigate-wikipedia-for-alleged-anti-israel-bias/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Eu0L8roZSU https://www.girlschase.com/article/why-do-people-think-you-need-money-get-girls https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ng7arZAzvSw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqC7FLdcx5s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAz_-ffRT5w

It’s harder in small towns because there are far less options. In cities a lot of them actually have more young women than men so it can be easier, though its harder in its own way since there are so many high status men women share.

https://old.reddit.com/r/badhistory/comments/1m83abg/raymond_ibrahim_on_the_first_crusade/ https://old.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/kg23fy/what_is_the_scholarly_opinion_of_raymond_ibrahims/ The guy you brought up has been called out for multiple falsehoods, and he’s associated with a Zionist think tank founded by a guy who spread the belief Obama is a secret Muslim. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_Pipes#Obama's_religion_conspiracy If you want to actually learn and not reinforce biases, study leading experts in the field, not propagandists.

Leo misunderstands the Bible and Judaism. It doesn’t actually say Palestine belongs to jews. And for most of jewish history it wasn’t considered to be land they should take. In the Talmud the three oaths actually say they shouldn’t retake it until the messiah returns. The idea of religious Zionism is relatively new and only formed after atheist Jews founded Israel.

No it wasn’t. A primary election is not the same as a general election. You can lose in a primary (or win in a primary) and get the opposite result in a general, it’s a completely different circumstance and electorate. The reason why they don’t admit Bernie doesn’t have wide appeal is because it is contrary to evidence. The only time he lost were primaries where a small amount of mostly older democrats voted, his “wider appeal” was not tested here. Polls consistently showed he did better among independents and even republicans in hypothetical general match ups than his primary opponents. Primaries test appeal among the party base, general elections test the appeal among the general electorate. Sanders loss proved he lacked appeal to the party base. Hillary and Kamala’s loss proved they lost among the general electorate. Concluding that we should keep going with Hillary and Kamala esque status quo politics for general appeal makes no sense based on these data points.