Synchronicity

@Existence It means that you’ve never experienced anything outside your own experience. Every person you meet is an image rendered in your mind. Does that mean they’re not real? No, not necessarily. Subjective doesn’t mean nonexistent. Your thoughts are subjective but they exist.

Hehe quite a bigger club than most would expect too

That just about sums up a piece of my work at the moment! Dialing in without any distinctions. Quite the oxymoron Lol It’s true that some experiences are more or less intense than others. They don’t all have the same amount of prominence. There’s infinitely many degrees of intensity. So there’s infinitely many versions of each experience that are less intense, equally intense, and more intense.

You know infinitely many things which makes it extremely difficult to distinguish one piece of knowledge from another. For example, there’s infinitely many universes exactly like this one. So when you’re experiencing infinity, you can’t even discern which universe your human self is located in.

Yeah it’s wild! I like to label the experience as Anythingness because, to me, that best describes the experience. But of course this Anythingness can’t be grasped through the description, as Serotoninluv is saying, because the description itself is a thing in that Anythingness. As for your question about getting knowledge about stuff like immortality, yes that’s possible but extremely difficult. You see, when you experience infinity, you’re experiencing infinitely many universes with infinitely many different scientific laws and, correspondingly, infinitely many different “right” ways to attain immortality. How do you know which method works for your Universe’s scientific laws? Picking the right method is like finding one grain of sand out of infinitely many. So knowing infinity is knowing so much that you virtually know nothing. Which universe is this? What laws of physics are at work here? Does a green light mean “go” in this world or is it the red light? Etc.

You have both the experience of the planet on its own and also the merged experience. Except, there’s not just one merged experience. There’s infinitely many combinations. So let’s say there’s three people (Fred, Dana, and Will). infinite experience includes the experience of just being Fred but also the combined experience of (Fred and Dana); (Fred and Will); (Dana and Will); (all three of them); (Fred and Dana’s right arm); (Will’s left foot and Dana) etc. I could keep going infinitely

Asking questions about who created what always leads to an infinite regress. At some point you have to accept that there’s no beginning and that there’s some fundamental nature that’s just always existed. Even if you think there was a beginning from nothing, it still inevitably leads to this infinite regress because what caused that creation?

Yes, you experience literally anything and everything in one eternal moment. The experience of this human person you are right now, but also all other human persons (not just on this planet but elsewhere). You don’t just have the experience of each person’s whole body but also every part of those bodies i.e. the experience of your left thumb, your right foot, your skeleton etc. You also experience animals, plants, and inanimate objects as well as their parts i.e. atoms, molecules etc. So the experience includes infinitely many experiences bundled up within each experience but they’re all meshed together into a perfect singularity. So it’s not as blocky as I’m making it sound. There’s also the experience of yourself two seconds ago; the experience of yourself 1 year from now; the experience of your grandparents when they were babies etc. You experience each version of each self in each moment. So there’s no longer any movement between moments and so, no perception of time and change. All moments are now. So the experience is like a Frozen Explosion of infinitely many snapshots and you’re immersed in all of them and are all of them. Again, this sounds like the experience is splintered, broken-up, blocky, and fanatic but as I mentioned, each snapshot is meshed together into One singularity

Look up Dimitri Mendeleev. He invented the periodic table and had a dream about its design that was so complete that he knew how many spaces were left to fill even before all of the elements were filled in. Also, I personally have taken multidimensional theories to professors in my physics department and they’ve found them plausible. I just need to find the math to back it up. There’s more examples, but channeling and intuition has led to some advanced scientific discoveries.

It’s possible to become liberated anywhere. Some attain it through isolated circumstances while others attain it through interaction with others. From the Absolute “perspective”, circumstance is more of a correlation rather than a causation. This is why there’s no such thing as one objectively right way to become awakened.

“That’s life. Stuff happens!” - Peter Ralston

Haha probably through frustrating trial and error of varying methods

?Exactly. You could trace and connect the causes all the back for infinity until everything can be used as your excuse Lol

Haha there’s something extraordinary happening but it’s so extraordinary that it can’t be made into a specific statement. Reality is so boundless that anything and everything happens within it, infinitely many times over, in infinitely many forms. So you catching the virus after swimming in that pool is an event that contributes to the divine infinitude of reality. There are other versions of this event that also contribute. Such as you catching the virus because you ate popcorn Lol Causes that we commonly attribute to certain effects can differ. For example, we associate the collision of two cars with the effect of both cars getting wrecked and the people inside getting injured or killed. Yet, there are universes where car collisions cause completely different types of effects, such as both cars teleporting Lol So any event can cause any other event.

@Schahin If anything and everything must happen, then a universe with specific physical, biological, and chemical laws must also happen. You’re assuming that it’d all be chaotic but a boundless reality includes both chaos and order. Both happen

@Inliytened1 Glad you liked it?

Just thought I’d dig this up because I’m thinking of writing the stories I was planning to and I’ll be referencing this thread.

Yes, there are infinitely many things going on. There are infinitely many worlds exactly like this one (minus a single infinitesimal difference) but there’s also universes that are drastically different from this one. So drastic that they’re like living in pieces of abstract artwork.

@Nate0068 From my direct experiences, yes. Human beings experience three primary colors (red, yellow, and blue) but there are infinitely many primary colors that the human mind doesn’t experience and can’t imagine.

Not sure if this is considered self-promotion, but here’s a short video (7:59) that can hopefully offer a few of you some helpful insights:

I don’t think any of these quotes are paradoxical. They all make perfect sense to me. But I’ll add on to the Nondualistic quotes anyways ? “The Absolute is Relativity itself” “impermanence is permanent” ”Duality is Nondualistic”

I’ve found that it is. Many minds included within Infinite Consciousness. That unites duality and Nonduality but the boundaries of each mind is relative. Like identifying a drop of water in the ocean. No hard boundaries

@ShaunI respect your skepticism and search for honest truth, so I’ll be frank with you and tell you that not all Enlightened people are perfectly happy. Some are, yes. But not all. Some are - rather than happy - narcissistic, bitter, aloof, sarcastic etc. There’s Enlightenment and then there’s application of it. Those who apply it in a way that helps them find happiness are the happy ones.

There’s nothing wrong with skepticism and having opinions. Just recognize how limited the knowledge that you gain from direct experience is. For example, you’ve most likely read about chromosomes in a science textbook, but have you ever seen them for yourself? How do you know that what you read is true until you’ve seen it? You can say you trust what you’ve read - and that’s perfectly fine - but do you truly know it to be true? This is what radical open-mindedness feels like. It’s not about changing your beliefs. It’s about questioning them.

Yeah, there’s a lot more evidence than the mainstream admits. They still won’t consider it conclusive evidence.