Danioover9000

@tvaeli True, so generally Islam is the youngest orthodox religion, next is Christianity, next is Judaism, then Buddhism is next although Confucianism/Taoism maybe earlier, Hinduism technically being the oldest, but actually Zoroastrianism is THE OLDEST RELIGION BY FAR, with some paganist religions in between Zoroastrianism and Hinduism. Yes, Christianity had the crusades but for good reasons why the Pope and Catholics wanted it to happen:

@StarStruck They kinda are still addictive, but in comparison to Tik Tok it's way worse.

@Recursoinominado This Dr. K guy, I've seen him. I do like some of his content albeit they tend to be replay or rehashes of original videos or stories told, but he does a decent job analyzing the psychology of some of who he covers. Now it makes a bit more sense why when she's telling her story it felt more 'performative' than 'truthful', given her swim suit modeling background, and news anchor background, fields that would implicitly teach you to self modulate your behaviors, seem more politically correct and able to front a fake image despite how you really feel. In fact, if what she said is true at 5:25 to 5:30, calling Dr. Fauci a 'Genocidal Nazi physician.' than according to Sigmund Freud, and Carl Young, that psychological projection is actually self describing her own shadow self, her own shadow psyche as a 'Nazi' and a ''genocide self image', meaning that she has a deep desire and fantasy for the ultra far right, and that she desires a mass genocide of a certain group of people. Also given her past visits to certain news outlets and certain language and talking points of the ultra far right nationalists, I'm confident that she has a self image associated with nationalists and alt right Nazis.

@Recursoinominado Did a bit of body language analysis on her in this footage...it felt quite defensive and there's some deception going on in her recounting. If you listen to her tonality, it's the type most sales and con artists use to tell a very interesting story. Her way of storytelling is a bit performative and it feels like she's trying to infuse emotion into her story...I don't know how to describe it, but it feels very off putting disregarding the dark subject matter of what happened to her. Also a bit of discourse analysis, part of why I felt it's more defensive and maybe some lying going on is 69 minute's way of presenting and editing the footage. They started their frame opener with her as an experienced 'war reporter'...ok? If that's the case then why is she mostly unarmed in the event? Why didn't she wear some armour? Why wasn't bodyguards armed? Why did she put herself deep and thick in the protesting crowd? IMO it begs the question here. Between 4:00 and 5:00, when she's getting into more detail about that situation, when it does start to happen, at around 4:55 to 5:00 the grey haired 60 minutes reporter was leaning back and had his right hand fingers pressed to his lips(in body language when a person leans away or shifts posture away from subject talking, they usually don't feel comfortable with their tale or are disagreeing with how they tell their story. Also, this is mostly called a blocker, or a 'shield', in that it non-verbally shows subconscious defensiveness, that the conscious mind DOES NOT WANT TO SPEAK! So it non-verbally tells the body to 'Shush it!' when he's pressing his right fingers with his pen in between, signaling non-verbally he's either self conscious and doesn't want to speak, or he doesn't agree with what she's saying). Also she finally became much more emotion, around the 6:00 minute mark, but beforehand she wasn't that emotional, like she's too calm about telling her tale, and there's a moment before when she's describing looking up in a pretty bad moment, but there's this 1-2 second delay when she looks at the grey haired reporter, as if seeking social connection or is seeing if that bit of her story telling is getting the right response from that reporter. That moment is here between 5:00 to 5:15, and non-verbal the grey guy looks down cast and a bit left.

@Recursoinominado The problem is that YouTube shorts and Instagram reels are a response to competition raised by Tik Tok. It's actually predatory capitalism and Neo liberalism run amok here with the group ByteDance looking at what happened to Facebook's Vines, the good and the bad, and they ended up refining what should have been Vine's strong points and gave more money to creators. What YouTube and Instagram, Facebook by extension, is an example of Moloch that Daniel Schmachtenberger and other systemic thinkers and philosophers talk about, when you factor in Spiral Dynamics stages of development, cognition, morality, developmental psychology, personality types/traits, shadows of the ego, Integral Theory's other lines of development, ideological beliefs indoctrinated, information ecology, and again predatory capitalism by big companies that use misinformation and marketing to manufacture conspicuous consumption of users.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but would this event be an example of Islam coltishness?

This is how you handle a situation like this, very mature minded: Not like the disaster below, inviting a grifter cuckoo. So immature handling, so obvious the bias and poisoning the well:

Post great mature podcasts, mature minded minds giving their takes! Only high quality podcasts for great self actualization!

@Merkabah Star Oi Vey is Hebrew for karen? I can already see 100 words that rap with that!😂

@Heaven I'm not sure what you mean by clear? Can you lay out your argument, and provide justifications and evidence to show me how brainwashed they are? Again, what do you mean by close minded they are? Can you explain and provide and example/proof of their close mindedness. If cults are to be eliminated and addressed for what it is, and you're a part of a cult, does that mean I and my group get to eliminate you and your group? Also what do you mean by eliminate her, and why eliminate first then address later??? Are you not putting the cart before the horse? I don't know why. Can you illustrate your reasoning why religions are still powerful in the 21st century? Would atheism, secularism, and science count as a religion too?

Is Ben a Israeli typical name?

@Leo Gura And in exchange for being too pro America, and speaking out against the Ukraine war he gets smeared and defamed by the same side:

Hahaha, notice how he used small capital m martial arts and big capital m martial arts. Maybe he sometimes watches Leo's content?

@Nivsch Would you like a list of different definitions and types of genocides? Like displacement genocide? Mass killings genocide? Language genocide? Misrepresentation genocide? Apartheid genocide? Splitting the hairs genocide? Apple pie genocide? Like when does it clearly show genocidal intent by Lukid party Zionist regime rulling over Israel versus Hummus genocide? Which genocide is worse?

@zurew And intuitively because of this I'm more pro regulation or even ban against Tik Tok, it's that addictive and really well designed for hyper addiction that it's the best soft invasion weapon used by China against USA and other western countries. It's both amazing and disturbing. Also would you expect empirical research when it may make big tech companies look bad?

@DocWatts 1. So he doesn't think that bans are effective, and all bans are useless? Including the ban on certain drugs like Cocaine, heroine, Meth, the hard addictive drugs, and drug sourcing? Bans on certain porn materials? 2. How would you teach your child self restraints and healthy limits against Tik Tok, which is engineered to be the most addictive social media platform on the planet? From no time markers, to infinite scrolls, to flashy visuals and audio, and an A.I program that hyper curates content to user biases, how can you realistically expect children, whilst they're developing their brains and developing their Neo cortex, to will power and self restrain and self discipline against a super addictive app? 3. While I partly agree communally addressing, we cannot ignore the individual's free agency to desire for better change. Use myself as an example, it took 3 years for me to free myself from Coke Cola addiction, not because of community, but because of several personal reasons like health, energy levels, weight lose, diet, and other issues that I found has a common factor: Coke Cola. I've even started using Tik Tok a little bit, but after some weeks I can't continue because of how trash and toxic the app contents are. It's so blatantly assaulting my eyes and ears that I couldn't continue using Tik Tok, and that wasn't pressured by my friends or family or community to change that, but because my free will soul was being disturbed by that thing. 4. Mostly agree here, but in practice more freedom to children in the real world would be a bit difficult if the environments aren't safe enough, and there'd be sexual preds lurking in some neighborhoods, and also some children can be inherently evil and pick on more younger children.

@Schizophonia So if we let the atheism, feminism, egalitarianism, and multiculturalism run amok, cause more chaos, and not try to be more conservative and republican, ditch traditional values like family and community, let these degenerates express themselves, that the Lord will somehow smite them away and make the world a better place? We make the world a better place by letting murderers, sexual predators, thieves, scammers, and so forth who lean liberalism/democracy/individualism/egalitarianism just cause more chaos?

@DocWatts So to simplify his argument solution, he advocates for a slow, more regulation, versus outright ban? Basically if I have had a Coke Cola addiction, slow abstinence than cold turkey quit?

Bad, trash podcasts post here! IMO this show is so trash because we have a soft AF comedian, one foot in grave the other sticking out the grass lawn, super biased AF guy pretending he's so flowery and so rhetorically superior, so compassionate...FAKE AF! Not to mention they also had another podcast episode of 'we're gathered here today, the 4 stooges who died victims of Normand Finkelstein's debate tactics, the blonde, the demented dimentia old fart, the self deprecating deprecator, and divorcelli, we gather here to honor the memory of these cringe AF public figures that bit more than they could chew.'!🤣🤣🤣 Sorry stage red demon moment, had to rant a bit there:

@zazen True, and what's so frustrating with people like Destiny is they get to joke and weasel around like this, play with definitions and red herring here and there. Like he's delusion goes so far as to say in Twitter that he'd not consider it genocide even if you drop a nuke in Gaza...and he's getting more popular lately in YT and Twitter. It's pretty concerning he gets away with blatantly immoral statements like that.

@Sucuk Ekmek Landscape painting? What style and what medium do you use?

@soos_mite_ah 1. Indonesia. 2. UK. 3. Canada Ontario. 4. USA, Washington, NYC, San Francisco. 5. Brazil. 6. Quebec. 7. Scotland. 8. Japan.

Decent YT here.

Yes, science can be violent. And? What is your argument? What are you arguing for/against Science being violent? What counts as 'violence' in a scientific context? Also, video below is a story showcasing the power of confirmation bias and other cognitive biases before any experiment conducted, and how unaware this scientist is when he's locking himself into a drawn conclusion that confirms his bias, yet isn't aware that his 'experiment' was coopted: