Danioover9000

Can we all say this together, that Netflix, please sort yourself out and stop alienating loyal fans? You need some help: How many shows must keep on getting ruined because of biases from the writers, actors or even the directors? OMG.

@Julian gabriel I definitely agree that we should expand Spiral Dynamics and add more complexity, more in a horizontal way like what would aliens and alien civilisations have as value systems, or if machine elves have their own versions of stages of development. Integral theory, by Ken Wilbur, is an example of doing just that, he read and added onto Spiral Dynamics to better determine at the individual level and other lines of development. For me, and some here, it's fun to entertain what versions of the spiral would look ljke from different sentient groups. It's basically philosophy at that point.

@Thought Art Sorry, I am special like that, so I can't help but nitpick. If English is not your main language, warn me beforehand so I can be gentle or ignore the grammar and spelling issues. Update: THEY FINALLY LISTENED TO ME! YOUTUBE, FOR 3 WEEKS, FINALLY ADDRESSED THE REPORTED VIDEO!!!?

@Thought Art Actually, offended for how they handled their videos in general, not being responsible for issuing warnings and disclaimers that warrant warnings and disclaimers in the description box and/or video edited clip, if the subject matter at hand is violent, graphic, dealing with drugs, and so on that need to be age restricted or parts that need censoring. The video you posted about paramilitary and how some of the alt right extremists are recruiting ex-military members, is actually good reporting. Yes, it's socialistic/progressive biased, and has anti mainstream bias as well, but I think this reporting is over all a good coverage, albeit if I had enough time and energy, I could point out flaws here and there with their reporting, plus technical issues, like again, NO DISCLAIMERS AND WARNINGS FOR COVERING RADICALISTIC TOPIC AND POTENTIAL VIOLENT USE OF GUNS. Or something like that.

@Florian I really did tag the wrong person, sorry about that, I'll accept the F U and share in the fed-up feelings that are building up in this thread. Sometimes some users that take these threads seriously can be too much, sorry that you're getting warning points over pointless drama.

I don't know, but I'm getting the feeling that she's a Trump apologist, that is generalizing and distorting half the American population at around 1:30 time mark. I'm starting to not like her, and Lex Fridman more, especially since4 he platformed Kanye West, and this questionable person. Disappointing, but am I right in my intuition?

Here's the video: What are your thoughts and feelings after listening to the video?

@julienw Thanks for your clarification, I thought you were generalizing and I'm like 'what about Ghandi and other celibates that impacted society in positive ways?'. Yes, I do notice this dynamic of the mind liking to be identified as the victim, belonging and comingling with likeminded people, enforcing the victimhood narrative further. It's a tricky issue to tackle.

@DrugsBunny Excuse me, bugs bunny, what wool do you have over your eyes? What drug is bugging you out, with all these pathological logical lies you keep telling me and others here? trying to debate and argue others with your so-called rational construction? What do you have to offer, for OP, instead of derailing OP's thread with sophisticated hate, you hare? You ain't OP, overpowered by Ye's hubris: Anarchistic communist. Oh? thought I didn't catch on, that it's a second account of sophisticated clout making? Maybe less arguing and more willingness to learn? Less debating and more open mindedness? I suggest you humble yourself with humility, and less pretending to be a big footed bigot full of bigotry.

@Florian Can you show where I am toxic in this thread? Otherwise, why the toxic labelling?

@Ramu Not even in a controlling way, it can sometimes go wrong, and a few get canceled because blind mob justice.

On the Donald Trump section, I don't think either side appreciated how dangerously close he almost ruined the USA, because most of Donald Trump's foreign policies came little from him, and more from others with more experience than him. I think Lex Fridman underestimates, and to some extent Fiona Hill, how Donald Trump's narcissism and some members of his group of lobbyists damaged to some extent Obama's policy and other areas of its government. Am I wrong that I get the sense that Lex Fridman is too autistic and left brained to understand how close America came to ruin? I get the feeling, my inference of both Lex Fridman and Fiona Hill, is that neither are willing to give a stronger answer towards Donald Trump, as if they fear a strong backlash from the right. To me, I'd clearly state that Donald Trump did more harm than good to American politics and policies, and that the majority of that came from his lack of political development and experiences, him conflating his business experiences as enough to run a political campaign and country and other lines of development that regress, depress and sometimes progresses other lines of development.

@Stovo No, I think you're right in saying that wokeism one of many other limitations of the excesses of SD green groups and values. Wokeism also is part of the SD green political activism groups like humanitarian rights activism, animal welfare activism, environmental activism, even the online strains of the leftist political activism groups like SJWs or #Metoo activists, even ANTIFA is part of wokeism although it's a more aggressive soft terrorist group of the left that goes farther than activism.

20 minutes in, my impression is that Fiona Hill is conflating similarities of her environment and upbringing from growing up in her culture, to some other culture. I felt like there's likely a blind spot there, like she's attributing that Russia is like the United Kingdom and its treatment of Belfast, akin to how Russia is treating Ukraine. I don't know, something's off. Again, it all depends on one's stage of development, cognitive and moral development, psychological development and personality types, states of consciousness and being/becoming identity developments, life experiences and other lines of development, worldviews, biases, preferences and beliefs that are indoctrinated and imprinted by one's family and upbringings and shadow aspects of the psyche and value systems. Of course, I have my own biases and worldview about Lex Fridman and Fiona Hill and the other guests he has interviewed, which may cloud my intuitive signals from GOD, the universal mind's source, or simply my right brain signaling getting corrupted by my own prejudices and biases of my own life experiences.

It's an interesting interview, both to me were trying to make their points, but I felt that after Russel Brand brings up the Elliot Page guy, that was the point JP's mind closed down, became defensive, and both were talking past each other, not taking the time to unpack each other's bias in this dialectical exchange they were supposed to have. I felt there was plenty of issues and blind spots in their values systems, cognitive and moral development, personality typing, ego development, states of consciousness, life experiences and other lines of development, and other areas of differences that have yet to develop, along with beliefs and worldviews that each person's mind likes to generalize, distort and distract from a more honest intellectual dialogue that could have happened:

@Space Solid take, I intuit this as well. Although, in an ideal situation, Elon Musk should listen to some feedbacks in running Twitter, but I don't think he's going to listen to all the feedback, only some that don't threaten his bias too much, and will continue to run using whatever strategy he designed in mind for HIS Twitter, not the Twitter codesigned by OTHER PERSPECTIVES, from the users to the moderators, to the board members, and to advertisers and other third and so parties that make up the many other sides of this issue.

@Florian Sorry, I tagged the wrong user, I meant the other user, the bunny who's using drugs. Didn't even know you existed.

Just because of this thread, I'm following Elon Musk, so I don't know what's really the point of this thread anymore, as it's supposed to compile a list of failure points of one individual's intent to change a digital organization? Maybe because of the differences in stage of development, cognitive and moral development, psychological and personality typing, ego development, sate of consciousness, life experiences and other line of development, and differences in beliefs and worldviews that most of you have, plus your biases of self-made millionaires and billionaires, that you cannot accurately judge and discern and make some distinctions that Elon Musk may have had the strategic intent of ruining Twitter. Or he is forward thinking enough, despite being hard wired for more left-brain activity, that he can evolve Twitter in a much better shape and form...by trimming down the political activism that's rampant from most lefties and some righties in the Twitter space.

@Ulax Maybe if it's most of the lesson, but I disagree that there's no lesson learned from a demonized perspective. At least, if you're open minded and imaginative, you can see how the demonized perspective thinks and does, and their approaches. You learn what their pitfalls are and learn to avoid them. Again, depending on stage of development, cognitive and moral development, psychology and personality type, ego development, states of consciousness, life experiences and other lines of development, you can reframe a person you tend to demonize in so many ways that you can learn many more lessons from them, of what to do and what not to do. Ultimately, nobody is perfect or saintly, they are human. The sooner you contemplate and realize what that actually means, the sooner you reach world peace, at least with yourself.

@Victor van Rijn Nice, sadly Elon Musk's specialty is visionary engineer and not a social media moderator, so, not likely any of it may be considered.

Actually, maybe we should share tag functions and short cuts in a page for posters here. I think it's great.

@FlyingLotus That's really cool, let me try IT REALLY WORKS! NICE!

@Thought Art Also am surprised that they also don't give disclaimers or warnings, in the description or video itself, of showing imagery of radical hate groups and hate speech and violent use of guns, or age restrict this video. WTF IS WRONG WITH VICE?

@Thought Art Don't you see the issue that this alternative media is doing? There are no warnings or disclaimers on their videos of any graphic content, physical attacks or violent imagery of wounds, drugs, gun violence and so on. They also don't age restrict any of their video that breaks TOS in YouTube, like this video: Has no warnings or disclaimers of showing a knife wound, twice, which was the result of a violent attack. That's fucking graphic content, and the video ain't got no warnings or disclaimers in the description and in the video, or is age restricted, literally any person too young checks the video, gets the sighting of the graphic content. VICE IS IRESPONSIBLE AND SHOULD PUT WARNINGS IN DESCRIPTION/VIDEO, AGE RESTRICT, CENCOR THE KNIFE WOUND, TAKE DOWN THE VIDEO, OR FACE REPURCUSSIONS.

@Thought Art Can you simplify your question a bit more? Also, you're*.