Danioover9000

While I'm ranting, what is the point of your thread OP? Like really that example is a bad example because if you want other users to engage with your topic and post, why use a thought terminating cliche example if you want others to engage with your thread? On average imagining a person's arm getting sawn off is already going to create DISENGAGEMENT with your post, the opposite of what you want right? So why are you shooting yourself in the foot already with such a low conscious and low quality framing?

@StarStruck So, you do have some privilege? And who is this porn star you encountered? Are ALL porn stars troubled? Why did you equate watching pornography to watching someone's arm getting sawn off? Why not something more relatable? Do you have a Ryona fetish or what? Do you mean things are being compartmentalized instead of sawn off? Here's an agreeable comparison you did, equating the nowadays porn is seen as normal as cigarettes were seen as normal. Still, there's a false equivalency here between the negative effects of porn to negative effects of cigarettes.

This is an interesting video. Can you spot where each side talking about systemic racism goes right and goes wrong? Where the biases distort which facts to suit and defend their egos?

@StarStruck It's complicated, based on many developmental factors like SD stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, 9 stages of ego development, states of consciousness, life experiences and other lines of development in life and societal domains, ideological indoctrination via grooming, gaslighting and priming in upbringing and culture, and self biases and preferences especially sexuality, sexual orientation, sex rate, attractions ECT. To oversimplify, you cannot virtue signal others to follow your particular sexual tastes about pornography, demand absolute porn prohibition, without consequences from your individual biases over a portion and average of the male and sometimes female population.

Another nice video, this time analyzing a retired intelligence agent talking about aliens and their technology. Because of his background, he seems well prepared and also knows how to not leak tells and deception signs around certain choice words:

Nice breakdown:

This also, actually got a few more people so the social interactions will bring out more tonality and body language behaviors and mannerisms to analyze from:

Another interesting interview by James Cameron, and CNN reporter, enough body language and tonality to analyze:

@StarStruck 'Point to somebody who isn't biased.' You stated, so I did, Chat GPT 4, with it's BODY OF TEXTS AND LANGUAGE, which is programmed by WHOs, which in it's earlier development literally had an unbiased take on various aspects and ideas. It's not a human being, which is a deeply biased sentient thing, but this tool is made from the bottom up with language training, to be able to form sentences and it's own insights. and is not a living being nor a biological sentient thing. So, IMO, it fits your statement literally, a thing that lacks biases.

@Leo Gura It was just the way they described it as if there wouldn't be remains left, let alone even recovering the Titan parts.

@Danioover9000 Let's be really honest, sometimes experts can be wrong with their speculations past couple of days, and if in this case they're wrong, then the people have suffered greatly in this Titan. What a sick twisted humour GOD can have in situations like these.

UPDATE!!! They have recovered the Titan, and apparently there are human remains: Don't know yet what conditions are the remains are or like. Couple of days experts were saying that when the implosion happened all 5 would have been cooked or tomato past from the immense pressure and implosion.

@StarStruck ChatGPT 4.

@Majed @StarStruck Sure, but that doesn't excuse Tate's webcam girls and pimping tactics, tax evasion and having a very sexist and misogynistic view. Yes, Pat's got better character than Andrew Tate and better morality, which is kinda sad to see him appearing to run cover stories for the Tates especially after that BBC interview. How about you both stop posting in a low consciousness manner first, instead of telling me what and how to write my own posts? Thanks.

@Majed I would say, based on developmental factors like SD stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, 9 stages of ego development, states and modes of being and becoming, other lines of development in one's life and societal domains, ideological beliefs indoctrinated, groomed and gaslight by upbringing and culture, and self biases and preferences, Pat's character is more developed than Andrew's especially in stage blue and orange. Andrew too immature and manipulative compared to Pat, even though Pat does manipulate he's more a solid in his blue and orange values more than Andrew Tate.

@StarStruck And Andrew Tate, don't forget the traffic police man. However, him running covers and excuses for Andrew is suspect though. I like how he does his interviews, even if he's deeply biased and can't think of the bigger picture.

@ItsNick The blind leading the blind. I don't think Patrick even FEELS shame or embarrassment for these kinds of behaviours, it'll take something very serious for him to stop being this immature.

@Ajax Yes, there could be correlation between medication use, like anti depressants, and lower range of emotional outputs and expressions. Same bald guy you've linked also did a body language analysis on Michael Jackson, and did bring up that when analyzing people with strong medication, and those that did facial constructive surgeries and Botox injections and so on, that typically these medical preventions can interfere to some extent the normal expressions of a person's face. Chronic depression, insomnia, and deep apathy related emotions on a daily can effect not just the range of facial expressions but general body expressions. Also a factor is socialization, or the lack of, and maybe I'm wrong here, the infrequent use of one's mirrors to see one's face, or the infrequent visualization of a face in our mind. That and many other factors could combine up to give that level of resting bitch face or that level of not caring. For Brian Cox I don't think it's medication related, could be a factor, but I'd bet it's deeply psychological, and related to his ego being identified as and constructed as a scientist and rationalist. In fact, typically with very hardcore atheists and rationalists and skeptics, not just Brian Cox, for example maybe Richard Dawkins types they are so deeply identified with the left brain and the logical being and role that deep in their psyche there's a much larger gap of walls between rational and emotions, and rational is over valued in these types of personalities. There's too much head space activity with little to very little heart space activity, so what you'd expect to be some normal ranges of emotions and facial and body expressions tend to be much more lower and much more suppressed. Although with him I do sense some emotional leaks in his tonality especially when talking of his interest, it just FEELS, and people like him, that there's this thick dam constructed that really suppresses that range of expressions and emotions. Also, thanks for sharing this guy! I was thinking of sharing, until I forgot to and thought I'm missing another body language channel to include, and he's pretty good too.

Nice range of body language and tonality, and interesting interview setting, will be reviewing later: Plus this clip too:

@Leo Gura Yes, I mostly agree, with every start of a hobby or work, there needs to be love and passion to help lubricate the friction that is boredom and tediousness. IMO obvious but not so with Buddhists and spiritualists??

@Danioover9000 Imma first analyze this rattle snake guys takes, and determine if he is a deceptive snake or defensively coiled, no pun intended: 1. Heavy emphasis and appealing to logos throughout the video, and some ethos and least pathos(guy covering a debate and argument of capitalism and communism, with a strange hairstyle and weird plain T-shirt? Come on, the guys debating at least make better appeals to authority and pathos by trying to look the part, but you just look poor and strange). Lots of hand emphasis and activity and around the face in the intro, although IMO the intro is misleading because in this debate there's not a clear dunk or clear victor, just two debaters and the rattle snake reviewer here, who are all ignorant of the developmental factors like SD stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, states of consciousness, 9 stages of ego development, other lines of development in one's life domains and societal domains, ideological beliefs indoctrinated from upbringing and culture, and self biases and preferences from which these debates and arguments serve to protect and defend each egos' biases and ideas and SURVIVAL, which is why ALL HUMAN BEINGS are DEEPLY BIASED, and use logic and reasoning and appeals to such to disingenuously look and appear superior to the other. Because if true that LOGIC and OBJECTIVITY are infallible, then I couldn't lie and bend and invent numbers and statistics up in my English presentation class back when I was in high school, I wouldn't and couldn't lie with logic, yet I pulled it off, and given how liars and manipulators use alibis to defend themselves, guilty or not, and the detectives using logic to, in good faith or not, try to get a confession, already I intuitively grasped the limits and corruptions of logic. 2. In the debate itself, Hasan's posture remains consistent, mostly crossed leg, left leg pointing to mod and debater, usually legs point away as non verbal defensiveness, left hand mostly rests on left knee, for bracing and applying some tension later on when he feels defensive, and mostly stays leaning onto the chair, with subtle variations, tonality is also consistent with sometimes spiking in louder volume for emphasis and for ethos appealing, more empathy seeking and softer, slight confidence and assertiveness but I'm picking more supplicative tone, appealing to the humanity more than to the logic. The capitalist debater here, in contrast, mostly maintains upright sitting, or leans forwards with elbows resting on knees, forwards more to audience than to Hasan or mod, more assertive and somewhat aggressive, and commanding. Briefly, moderator also appears generally closed off, but look ant his legs: crossed over, with his right leg pointing to Hasan and away from the capitalist debater, non verbally agreeing with Hasan over the other, and at least more comfortable with Hasan over the other, very interesting. 3. 1:44 - 1:47, IMO I don't like this part. Firstly, it's an edited jump clip, so Rattlesnake guy here made a cut and jumped to this part. Capitalist guy upright sitting, with commanding and authoritative tone, and right hand emphasizing by bobbing up and down or bouncing, with this 'okay' symbol of the index and thumb together with middle, ring and pinky fingers upright but together not spread, whilst saying "JUST because someone gets rich-" and WAGGING his right index at Hasan followed by "Does not mean someone gets POOR(wagging ends with sudden whip downwards with index, emphasizing POOR". I don't like wagging fingers because this body language sign is more of an aggressive non-verbal rejection and dismissal of another's point, reserved mostly as some condescending way of saying no to children whilst belittling them, which I and the body language analysist community don't recommend wagging a finger, side to side towards a person, or vertically at a person, and ESPECIALLY pointing at a person because subconsciously a pointing finger reminds use of spears or swords or weapons that are dangerous and can damage and pierce us. Whether his wagging is intentionally to belittle and reject Hasan or he's subconsciously ready to fight I'm not sure. Overall consistent expressive and emphasizing right hand per word choices and still authoritative tonality, before he switches to holding the mike with right and left hand takes over, expressive towards Hasan and Mod. This bit, at 2:14 to 2:16, capital guy goes " You know what?(left hand emphasis vertically) I DON'T HAVE TO CALL YOURSELVES SOCIALISTS Bernie Sanders( left hand emphasizes again, palms now turn upwards and more open, fingers more pointing to mods and Hasan) calls himself SOCIALIST." This part camera zooms in by Rattlesnake's decision which is a bit suspect, Hasan give very quick, tonality and influx very light at the end of "Yeah!" followed by a quick eyebrow raise which typically non verbals for surprise, social approval seeking or emphasis on what's said, IMO probably surprise he's agreeing while capital guys says "And we SHOULD REJECT SOCIALISM", and second "Yeah." is a quick shoulder shrugging mostly from his left, his left arm which is bracing against his closed, crossed off upper left leg, quick nods too, as if Hasan agrees with that second part, and finally before the jump cut mod was facing capital guy, but turns to Hasan with a smirking or contempt smile on his left side of face, not sure what this could mean. Reason this part I am sensitive of is because this zoom in and jump cut is mostly by Rattle snake guy's choice, as if he want s the audience to think Hasan is agreeing with capital guy's points, as if Hasan is a hypocrite, when in fact he's agreeing specifically with the prior word choices and points capital guy brought up with Bernie Sanders calling himself a socialist, and not with the rejection of socialism point, which is disingenuous from this YouTuber IMO.

Another interesting video to analyze the body language, tonality, non verbals, and framing of the situation:

@Intraplanetary What I know is that I have a heart, mind, soul, and know enough that finding your passion first is important, then it becomes easier to dedicate more time into honing your skills, because there's alignment with that passion, heart, mind and soul. I at least know my own perspective, but unfortunately your POV is strange to me, like why do you risk more boredom and tediousness by over committing into one craft too early, without knowing or feeling if this one area in life, in career, the skills, is actually making you happy and fulfilled in life? It's like you're a robot to me, on the other end of the spectrum. I don't know, but you do you, maybe your mistakes are to MY advantage, and might benefit me in the long run, make my life much easier.?

@Princess Arabia OP is a she? Probably OP did read your post but chose not to respond for whatever reason. I'm probably dealing with one of those logical types of personalities or something, maybe, I don't know. I just intuit that passion is a pretty important emotion, and the discovery of what makes a person passionate is where that person then can justify dedicating most of their free time into mastery and harder work and training into the field they discover is very interesting to them. The other way around is possible, but more difficult, and actually can trigger more tedious and boredom feelings much earlier, which, if the person has not enough will power or passion, cannot overcome and might just surrender to a more mediocre life. I just think that life is already difficult, or sometimes very difficult, so emotions are important, and discipline too, to get through life, and passion is several of those emotions that can fuel that drive.

@Intraplanetary I'm sorry I hurt your feel feels, but even some users in YOUR thread are agreeing with me over you because they intuitively get which order is important here: FINDING PASSION first, then DEDICATION. It's like if Robert Green here is over emphasizing the discipline and hard work ethic and dry logical and logistics of mastery that comes later over passion, passion that sparks that fuels the liveliness of seeking and the journey to mastery, he's overlooking HOW IMPORTANT PASSION IS for MASTERY, the thing he's DEDICATED to talking about, like he's LOVING JUST TALKING about MASTERY yet FORGETTING how IMPORTANT PASSION IS! It's like talking about sex and pornography, and the speaker ignores the passions and lusty feelings and joys and the sexual visions of a sexy life of having proper sex, and only focuses on one sexual technique and the mechanical-robotic-business-transactional-like-nature of pornography, like using one finger. Nobody cares enough to master the one finger technique if NOBODY is encouraged to find what makes them passionate deep inside in themselves, to seek and find that passion to improve their sex lives, yogic sex positions, and so on. It's a big journey that needs a spark, that needs MOTIVATION, that needs LONGING, that needs AMBITION AND DRIVE, that NEEDS DESIRE! And that spark is PASSION! Something this robot in this video LACKS because he ONLY LOVES TALKING ABOUT MASTERY AND NOT PASSION!! HE'S A SEELOUT OF REASON AND LOGIC AND BETRAYS THE EMOTIONAL AND INTUITIVE, THAT WHICH IS IMPORTANT FIRST BEFORE LOGIC!!! And YES! It's in a spectrum, but the order of importance here is find that which makes you passionate FIRST, then dedicate time and energy and other resources. FIND WHAT MAKES YOU PASSIONATE FIRST. That's the proper order.