Danioover9000

@Schizophonia However, if you're saying yes that most porn stars are crazy and insane, that implication too also muddies the definitions of crazy and insane, and even other mental disorders too. So, are you saying that all porn stars are mentally disordered, insane and crazy, and willing to risk muddying the established terms of crazy and insane? How does consent have nothing to do with pornography, when consenting and signing written contracts IS what makes pornography legal and ethical sex work, versus non-consensual sex work not signed or contracted? Is it really the case that it's only understood to come from only what causes a person to accept this, and what is 'this' are you referring to? Why just cause and not correlations or multiple causations? Why do you assume there's no love in pornography? Do you mean no sexual love, no genuine love? So men who mostly sign up for pornography are more in control, dominant and psychopathic, and women who sign up are mostly submissive? How are these assumptions not sexist and misogynistic to men and women? How is sexism and misogyny a liberal excuse? So what is your logic here? That denial(negation) of balance of power, between social agents(porn stars, men/women, contractors?) + the qualifier 'as a fallacious means'(not definable yet.) = denying individual experience? How does that line of reasoning include this other line of logic, that sociological subjects = liberal delirium? Again you seem to use very loaded terms here that you yet to define carefully, to justify some anti porn sentiments you seem to have. What is true? That a man, or women, had to do pornography? Why are you assuming that men or women that do pornography had to do pornography? What causations and correlations are you bringing up here to create a situation that all male and all female porn stars are FORCED into working in the pornography industry? Why are you assigning a conditional negation of 'but she was CONSENT' and (sophism 2 approaching what do you mean sophism 2?) and stating it's normal that there are difficult jobs? Stating that it's normal that there are difficult jobs necessitates CONTRACTS that are written, that the parties involved consented, interviewed, and trained, into being porn stars. Otherwise, since it's a difficult job(and what do you mean normally a difficult job here, getting fucked? How is getting fucked a difficult job?) that can mean that the more the difficulty, the more prone to abuse, which is why there's legal CONTRACTs and written CONSENT, otherwise you get black market illegal pornography here. How is stating that a brainer, or cashier, is a tough job, and then stating 'btw(HOW IS THIS A FALLACY?)you have something against cashiers! You are a misogynist!' a rebuttal to my one of my points I raised??? Why did you misquote and misconstrue what I've stated here? How is this: 'From one: There's a difference between drinking a cup of Senseo coffee and being filmed licking a man's sex with the look of a bitch until internal ejaculation. And then it wasn't "self-rape." You basically do whatever you want with your life including self-destruction. The review is not here.' a rebuttal and refutation of my questions here? Why are you dodging my questions here?

What is systemic Racism, and what is your definition? IMO, in my words, here's how I define systemic racism: What is systems, and systemic? It means that there's a moderate to big thing that contains multiple parts and other elements that make up that one big thing. So, for example, if you like at air plane factories, one airplane factory is not just one singular thing, that factor contains the assembly lines, the markers and symbols, a control room, human resources, automated machines, and parts of an air plane that was designed in a person's mind and blue printed, in the drawing boards and the 3d modelling systems the air plane designers do, then after many deliberations between designers and engineers and stress, they make thousands of simulations, then they make each part of the plane and assemble it. Finally that factory outputs that aircraft, which is also a system onto itself because it's also not just an airplane but a thing made of multiple other parts, and even other systems that are small enough to fit within the airplane like the electrical systems and gasoline piping systems. Another example is society, it's one giant thing which onto itself is made of many infrastructures. What is Racism? Simply put, it's a sub derivative off of the field of discrimination. What is discrimination? When one sentient and conscious agent discerns reality into parts, into comparisons and contrasts, and when one thing discriminates another thing, sentient things or non-sentient things for survival purposes, for example I'm discriminating hemlocks from blue berries, or discriminating toy guns from real guns, or discriminating camouflage patterns to warning patterns on a creature. So, racial discrimination is a sub derivative of discrimination based on what a person's skin colour is, approximately, and is specific between human to human discriminations, like I'm white and your black, or he's Asian and your white. Racism also is systemic, as well as overt to covert as well. Also a bit confused by this YouTuber, like how about define systemic racism then? Why so triggered? Not just systemic racism but there're other words loaded terms as well, but systemic racism to me feels most loaded and needs careful defining and clear, clarity of framework in discussing what is systemic racism, before discussing how do we improve ourselves, or improve as an individual to overcome these systemic issues? I mean it's in that word too as well, systemic, which means that almost no matter how hard you make appeals and fallacies to logos, ethos and pathos in your video, your appealing to individualism, which is mostly asymmetrical to systemic racism or systemic issues, because systemic deals with systems and collectives, and much less with individual parts. Can someone explain this part to me? Do you guys agree or disagree with my definitions, or is there a better explanation? I have yet to see someone actually tackle on this systemic racism, and give it a proper definition seriously, like most videos or most podcasts this systemic racism or systemic issues, when brought up, the interviewer and guest just talk circles around these terms, like COME ON!

@Ajax Apparently she's accused of grooming young children in her chats, from what I have learned so far, so that also explains a bit about the muscular tensions around neck and face when certain topics are worded. The manipulative part is she's disguising her tonality in this sing song way so I can't read her voice accurately, whether she's intentionally stressing the pronunciations for the music or actually defensive. It's manipulative sure, I'd even say self manipulation here. Also spotted contempt here and there from what I can observe.

@Nilsi Thanks for the share!

The observe guy's breakdown of her is amazing, and a bit funny: Sums up parts of my intuition and feelings about my first watch through of her.

This is a very interesting case. I've got a notification from this guy: The Behavioral Arts19 hours ago I have to sit this one out ?… I have been getting requests from many of you regarding the apology video by viral YouTuber Colleen Ballinger (aka Miranda Sings). I normally have a pretty rigorous selection process for the topics I cover. I have a few boxes a subject has to tick and I’ve often let trending topics go for many reasons. My goal here is to provide fair and unbiased analysis and if I can’t, I let subjects go despite how trending they are. As such, I cannot deliver a fair and unbiased analysis of Colleen Ballinger. As some of you may or may not know, her brother, Chris Ballinger, is a very accomplished and talented magician and since the magic/mentalism community is pretty small, we go way back professionally. He has performed many of my created tricks on his YouTube videos, we have worked together on television and I’ve always respected him as a colleague. As a corporate interviewer / interview consultant, it has happened once or twice in my career that an applicant for a position was someone I knew or related to someone I knew and I bowed out, it’s the same situation here. Even if I think I can analyze her apology video without bias, I’m sure my respect for her brother would play with my emotions. Thanks for understanding ❤️ Now that's his opinion and perspective, which is fine. I'm new to this community, but I am a firm believer in keeping an in group accountable, which means I'm will be analyzing her body language, framing choice, tonality, and micro expressions to muscular tensions around certain topics and words. Just because it's a fellow mentalist or language reader doesn't mean I can't treat them as equally as I treat others here when I analyze: First impressions: Manipulative for sure, but I will watch this repeatedly, because the deceptions and defensive signs are mixed here, plus music making is actually muddying this analysis a bit, but unfortunately for here I'm a rapper too, and can analyze music patterns as well so...her intent is clearly not to apologize, maybe to troll the haters and the mob that attacked her with these pedophile allegations?

@Hardkill Yeah, it's very sad when your reality bubble starts crumbling, and the external world reality checks your biases in place. real wake up call, and another example of transformational dilemma. Every change, and action will have an opposite reaction. an ego backlash, to maintain what's working, developmental factors all at play and all part of a more complex system and intelligence.

Take this for example in Japan, Sumo wrestling: What these people are ignorant of, especially in western cultures, divisions and hemisphere, is that the collective EGO doesn't care for your petty small concerns, your individualistic projections from your tiny EGO, it cares for IT'S OWN SURVIVAL! So if this is part of SUMO CULTURE, then the collective ego of sumo wrestling will defend it's practices, as is the case throughout the whole of history, based on the developmental factors and patterns of SD stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, states of consciousness, 9 stages of ego development, life experiences and other lines of development in life and society, and ideological beliefs indoctrinated, groomed and gaslight from upbringing and culture, as well as self biases. What these western biased people don't know of is that this is the transformational dilemma faced by Sumo wrestling, and by it's culture and collective ego, they don't get how challenging it is to enact change for the positive here, like more breaks for suspensions when the taking the break risks that injured Sumo Wrestler to be plummeted back down in the rankings.

@Schizophonia That's a low bar to me You've set. Like if true that no mentally sane woman allows herself to get fucked while in front of a camera, then most female porn actresses are insane and crazy by implication? What if the cameras are hidden, or what if you've found that some women, and let's not be sexist here, men too, have volunteered and written contract to be porn stars, would that still mean all porn stars working are insane? Also a low bar standard for rape too, because you can technically then make the argument that millions of citizens per country are getting raped by the surveillance systems of their governments and film industries filing actors/actresses are also raping them. So does that mean statutory rape then, if a government, or even a tourist taking photos and/or a film in some tourist beach site, had parts of your half naked body and other half naked bodies, without consent, is that rape? Statutory rape here meaning penetration sexually against one's will, typical definition, although yours may vary if apparently someone is getting raped if a camera is filming them regardless of non-consent or if it's contracted, consented and payment. Also, what about self rape? Technically there's substances like alcohol or coffee, which are addictive simulants, and I'm drinking them against my will then? Am I coercing or forcing myself to continue drinking these substances, down my mouth and throat, non-consensually? Or vice versa, am I raping myself when I want to force my will, force myself and abstain from alcohol and caffeine, or in this thread context abstain from porn viewing? Am I technically forcing myself to not watch, and derive pleasure in non-consensually not watching pornography?

Here's another one; Literally to me, this whole situation is like the many stories of me back in my high school days and college days, involving getting called by some nasty names or given nick names I don't like, sometimes I don't care, sometimes a few nick names are nice as they relate to what I can actually do, and typically in normal cases I face to face with that person and give them my piece of mind, and in most cases they don't keep calling me that anymore or risk a scrape happening. How this spiraled out of control and into this ludicrous situation, which is now getting politicized and monetized is almost insane.

@Salvijus Here's the video: Still hate Lex for trying to normalize boring monotone voice and resting bitch face, but decent video of sex work. Have to say she's pretty intelligent takes as well and probably worth the watch in chunks.

@StarStruck So, you complain about the pornography industry which does have standards and regulations for most of the porn actors and actresses unlike the black markets and illegal sex trafficking business, but defend an immoral character like Andrew Tate and Tristen Tate, the sex pimp traffic policeman, who breaks laws and regulations around tax evasion and has actual sexist and misogynistic views? Do you know you have a double standard here that deeply undermines the integrity of this entire thread? How can you defend Andrew Tate, but attack legal pornography???

@Israfil @Princess Arabia Am sorry, didn't mean to shock you both, the OP was using extreme example to falsely equate porn in a strong negative light, it just doesn't compute to me. The more you know right?

@Princess Arabia Sounds about right. ? My main issue with all pornography topics is 1) Get's emotionally charged quickly, like with politics and religion, and 2) the Genie's out of the bottle, and his posting is complaining and appealing to trying to get it back into the bottle, nope the problems out in the field, so instead of trying to reverse the problem go and address that problem in-field, in context. So much deep assumptions of severe restrictions to absolute prohibition of pornography would be the only absolute solution, by a very biased individual, projecting that solution over a societal complex issue, just like with the alcohol prohibition and how did that went? Splendid? or increased demands of alcohol in the black markets and more criminal interests? This is what will happen if there's too strong a push for prohibition of porn-more increases in pornography and sex work in the black markets instead, that part of the free market less regulated by law, where the actually sex crimes can occur...which is what we don't want right? What a twisted, almost catch 22 of perusing too strongly prohibitions too quickly.

While I'm ranting, what is the point of your thread OP? Like really that example is a bad example because if you want other users to engage with your topic and post, why use a thought terminating cliche example if you want others to engage with your thread? On average imagining a person's arm getting sawn off is already going to create DISENGAGEMENT with your post, the opposite of what you want right? So why are you shooting yourself in the foot already with such a low conscious and low quality framing?

@StarStruck So, you do have some privilege? And who is this porn star you encountered? Are ALL porn stars troubled? Why did you equate watching pornography to watching someone's arm getting sawn off? Why not something more relatable? Do you have a Ryona fetish or what? Do you mean things are being compartmentalized instead of sawn off? Here's an agreeable comparison you did, equating the nowadays porn is seen as normal as cigarettes were seen as normal. Still, there's a false equivalency here between the negative effects of porn to negative effects of cigarettes.

This is an interesting video. Can you spot where each side talking about systemic racism goes right and goes wrong? Where the biases distort which facts to suit and defend their egos?

@StarStruck It's complicated, based on many developmental factors like SD stages of development, cognitive and moral development, personality types/traits, 9 stages of ego development, states of consciousness, life experiences and other lines of development in life and societal domains, ideological indoctrination via grooming, gaslighting and priming in upbringing and culture, and self biases and preferences especially sexuality, sexual orientation, sex rate, attractions ECT. To oversimplify, you cannot virtue signal others to follow your particular sexual tastes about pornography, demand absolute porn prohibition, without consequences from your individual biases over a portion and average of the male and sometimes female population.

Another nice video, this time analyzing a retired intelligence agent talking about aliens and their technology. Because of his background, he seems well prepared and also knows how to not leak tells and deception signs around certain choice words:

Nice breakdown:

This also, actually got a few more people so the social interactions will bring out more tonality and body language behaviors and mannerisms to analyze from:

Another interesting interview by James Cameron, and CNN reporter, enough body language and tonality to analyze:

@StarStruck 'Point to somebody who isn't biased.' You stated, so I did, Chat GPT 4, with it's BODY OF TEXTS AND LANGUAGE, which is programmed by WHOs, which in it's earlier development literally had an unbiased take on various aspects and ideas. It's not a human being, which is a deeply biased sentient thing, but this tool is made from the bottom up with language training, to be able to form sentences and it's own insights. and is not a living being nor a biological sentient thing. So, IMO, it fits your statement literally, a thing that lacks biases.

@Leo Gura It was just the way they described it as if there wouldn't be remains left, let alone even recovering the Titan parts.

@Danioover9000 Let's be really honest, sometimes experts can be wrong with their speculations past couple of days, and if in this case they're wrong, then the people have suffered greatly in this Titan. What a sick twisted humour GOD can have in situations like these.