Nivsch

@Leo Gura Leo but what I just remembered now is that hamas has always increased the terror just after it smelled a breakthrough in the negotations between Israelis and Palestinians. A very famous example is Oslo agreement in 1993 when after it has been signed, a series of terrible suicide terror attacks has started as an attempt to fail it. Paradoxically, the most extreme parts of the Palestinians aren't interested in any of the oppression issues. Because if they were, they wouldn't try to fail the negotiations. The "right-wing" of the Palestinians try similarily to the right wing of Israel to fail any negotiation and a chance to achieve a deal. So according to this, hamas is this right wing of the Palestinian side, who don't want anything other the total annihilation of Israel, and the occupation of the West Bank as it sees in 1967 doesn't matter to him at all, but 1948 is.

I will try to bring ones a day a post from the center-left sector activists or politicians to show a wider and more real picture of our country voices and character.

AI can be the master of the Left brain style of thinking, but it cannot access the Right brain's territory and its kind of insights gaining capabilities.

Don't worry it wasn't that triggering but just not an honest analogy in general to anything Israel or other western country too does. Nothing personal about you. Just this analogy always appears and getting cheapened when belongs to a totally different world. I appreciate your answer. I agree with you that Netanyahu behaves badly in his retorics and in how he manages this war.

Sorry but I cannot play this game. What western militaries caused to innocent people are not even 0.1% of the severity of what The Nazi regime has done in amounts, methods, level of freedom of civilians and the lingering of the suffering. If you have others and earthly analogies add them.

@Nilsi According to that narrow logic then the European coalition and US are also oppressors with even worse ratios.

But we know there were terror groups who did brutal things against Jews here even in the 1930's for example the one leaded by Amin El Husseini. I think the most real dynamics is that there was a positive feedback back and forth between micro actions of both sides that created radicalization in both in thousands of small steps.

Ok, Yes, this is unfair too. See its not that IDF does not try to differentiate between hamas and civilians because the ratio shows it does it better than maybe any other western military who fought with guerilla before. But for the honesty and decency, still not good enough, and IDF still not really adapted to a war against guerilla. The west is bad at it. And yes in the heat of the war and the fear unfair generalizations on the field are done.

@Leo Gura But this is unfair to generalize it on Israel, because all that you wrote rooted in the rigid right-wing thinking and our method is, unfortunately, unlike in US, works in a way that 4 crazy knesset members can collapse the government if does not listen to them since any coalition must keep 61 knesset member (out of 120) to still be alive. If you heard a big chunk of the average of most sane even Bibi governments (yes, just part of them) in the past and of course any party from the center or left wing (all of them), you would hear a totally different picture and that no one of them interested in any land Palestinians are sitting in. The chunk that really want to settle in Gaza is only the far right wing.

Yes, an interesting point, if Israelis and Palestinians will learn from that trap as the principle Leo said in his video.

What caused them to start the second intifada in 2000 right after four different signed agreements between Israelis and Palestinians in the 90's and a negotiation process two months before that? I agreed this war is managed badly and for the honesty western militaries as a whole don't know how to deal efficiently with guerilla as we have seen from previous years. I agree about the problematic way Israel choose to manage the situation in West Bank. I think though that the beginning of the settlements project is understandable as I explained my thinking before about the dimensions of the WB in front of the central Israeli narrow corridor, but apart from this both sides are equally to blame in this dynamics and Israel has at least half of the responsibility. Brutal terror attacks though were way before 1967, so west bank is merely an another parameter but not the root of the terror motivation.

+1 ❤️

@Karmadhi IDF came to Gaza to kill hamas only after did far reaching steps (including billion dollar fences) for years to avoid this war, wereas hamas came here to kill as many civilians as it can. As much as I think this war is done badly, the context is very different and this "symmetry" game is untrue.

But you did it too.

@Hatfort hamas and the fundamentalist sectors who support him are responsible for at least 50% of the consequences due to his obvious strategics and they as who let him use their schools, homes, mosques and hospitals as his bases and storages. The fact that Israel just fell into the trap US or Europe coalition fell into before and killed even more civilians in total, doesn't disturb many to draw artificially the picture as Israel was the only "bad" guy, but that is exactly why this double standart does not impress me nor any other Israeli here who know maybe better than you think how to differentiate between fair and hypocrite critisism.

Yes but only Israelis can decide this and an arrest warrent from outside will only make him more popular inside.

Is your current reaction different than the reactions you see as unfair, narrow viewed or demonizing?

Do you want to go with your emotions or you want the best for Israelis and Gazans?

+1 ❤

Every forcefull interventions from the center-left sector here too (~45-50% of the population) to knock down Bibi during the last decade have failed and only strenghtened him. There were hard efforts almost all the time.

@Karmadhi This will make Bibi to be extremely popular again because his base will surround around him to protect him. A bad idea in my opinion. The things have to happen organically in their time without any outside intervention. As much as I highly disagree with you on the context and intentions (that changes all) I admit Netanyahu manages this war badly and does a significant extra unjust damage to Gazans that isn't necessary even as a war outcome.

And won't solve anything other than radicalizing the Israeli society, rather than to go to an elections, get rid of Netanyahu and go slowely back to the much more peacful and hopeful society before Netanyahu turned leftism into a disease. Of course it will be harder now after what happened.

Come on. Like BBC don't critisize Israel to the cellular level when they want to. He is just a fair journalist and interviewer this is an option too.

@Chadders I disagree. This is an hypocricy because though there was definitely an overreaction this time, the event has to be seen as the tip of 30 years long escalation process because this is the real picture and context. The heavy responsibility hamas and upper fundamentalist part of Palestinian society have too to the outcome in this war cannot be overlooked. Being stage red does not exempt you from responsibility in the same way violent settlers aren't exempted from responsiblity too to the fire they fuel. Aside with that, the meaning of fighting against guerilla when the outcomes in killed ratio were far worse when other western militaries did that too in the not-so-far past.

Ok. it will be interesting to see what is the case this time, since now this is I think very different when hamas reports can from its pov make the difference between survival and elimination, what wasn't the case in previous rounds.