Nivsch

📊 At least HALF of Israelis support a deal to withdrawal from philadelphia axis in exchange for the return of the hostages.

No, I meant to AIPAC and Jews lobbing. I mean, I think lobby cannot exist so successfully in a vaccum, but only on the ground of pre existing supportive relationships to begin with. This is more of a chicken and egg thing. See I am sure that Israeli speakers like Yosef Hadad and the like can be very shallow in their explanations. But sometimes when you deal with such a manipulative in enormous scale (again, holds solid truths but in the periphery) propaganda, sometimes you have to be sharp to the opposite direction even if it comes at the expense of the bigger more nuanced picture. But propaganda that has to arrive a message within 5 minutes and aimed to masses, cannot enter to higher discussion, and anyway it isn't a source we would look for for a serious nuanced investigation.

@Leo Gura If the burglary is so irrationally successful maybe it isn't actually a burglary?

@caspex If the mind grasps other people through its subjective versions it build on the top of any one of them, so of course if some substance temporarily changes its electrical circuits functions, all of that will be melt away, and it will then really feel like they aren't exist, because their existance for you is always shortcuted to stories and images in your mind, as this is the only way you grasp them. What that melts is your subjective feeling of them, but they themselves, outside of your biases, are still here. The problem is that you cannot feel they are here without those stories.

Postmodernism doesn't see that we objectively need different approaches in different times in our journey let alone in day to day changes. It thinks on itself as so flexible but in reality it is still fixed on a static soft-deconstructive worldview.

+1 ❤️

SD stage Orange center of gravity overlap

Only a daily influence on 100s millions of people all over the muslim world and outside it.

Lobbies aren't exist in a vaccum. Only on the ground of genuine supportive relationships to begin with.

Have you considered the full scope of consequences of an opposite decision before you decided what is more depressing than the other?

Exactly the same and 100 times more massive is the Iranian-Qataric-Aljazeera multi billionaire propaganda empire.

@Karmadhi Israel has historically released hundreds and sometimes thousands of prisoners (among them many terrorists) for only handful Israelis in return for example when Gilad Shalit was the only one who was freed in 2011 for 1027 Palestinian prisoners. The point of this guy is understandable but right now this is really Bibi who is part of the problem that makes decisions from political survival considerations. And above that, Israel is very polarized in its values systems especially in the last decade.

hamas is very active in the west bank. In fact most of the suicide bombing in the 90s and early 00s came from there, what forced Israel to enter this area much deeper, actually until this day.

It is true that at the beginning after the trauma the war was in a sort of consensus, but from couple of months ago it has started, at least the current phase of the war that endangers the hostages, to be controversial and Israel is very splitted right now.

Tel aviv main road is totally blocked. Right now from my car. Protest on the road between the cars too. I wanted to participate too but couldn't. Tomorrow a general strike in the economy in Israel. The reason is the murder of 6 hostages at the weekend when everyone know Bibi is one of the main obstacles to a deal. And probably also a general feeling that this government do all the wrong things in inner and outer issues and ruin the country.

Another stage Yellow+ page in how to heal trauma and the nervous system in general in a responsible thorough way that is very different from the narrow magic-pills-like techniques many (stage green?) mentors fall into: https://www.instagram.com/irenelyon?igsh=cWhzYTRqZ3Z4YzVi

Yes. Ok (checked more accurately) and: 11 centuries Jews were the majority from 10 BCE to 1 CE From 13 BCE to 11 BCE it is unknown whether they were majority or not because they were in a process of settling. From 1 CE to 3 CE minority under Rome but still a significant part of the population. 4 CE majority. 5 to mid 20 CE - minority. If I understood it all right. Yes this is an interesting question I don't know for now what is more true. Probably education through all those centuries took place, but also the maybe bad experience Jews felt when were abroad all those centuries what perhaps made them want their own country again. To say how can they feel emotions (except through education) to a land their generations have never step on? Well at least they could know by negation what isn't good for them. And then they crossed it with education. If I were a Jew back then in Europe in the middle ages, could I intuite I want to go to the land of Israel even without education? I will have to learn more about the countries Jews were in during 5th-19th centuries before I have a better answer.

Jews were really the majority on this land for many centuries, before became a minority for another similar amount of centuries, and then the Zionist movement started when the emotions became critically too strong to go back to this land.

If you deal with your challenges and problems directly then this is the true spirituality. You can only want to quit something you subconsciously feel as a bypass.

Former Head of IDF (2002-2005) and Minister of Defense (2013-2016) Moshe Ya'alon. Translated from hebrew (as always).

+1 ❤️

If its about to widen the way we look at reality and integrate more perspectives in addition and not instead of anything then ok.

I disagree that truth equal sickness or insanity. Its actually the opposite.

@BlueOak Thanks for the investment. All those are from your direct experience and your independent conclusions? I can relate to part of them, but I am not into solipsism and don't believe anything about turquoise I have no intuition to by myself. Why that a specific arrangement of neurotransmitters induced by some kind of psychedelic will show the most fundamental reality? I can understand that this is part of reality and a perspective. But who is to say that a psychedelic state, or some organization of neurotransmitters is more true than an another neurotransmitters combination? I think this is an emotional and biased decision affected by what the person want to be true. Anyway the Love thing I like and think there is a lot to it.