Nivsch

Member
  • Content count

    1,875
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nivsch

  1. @Raze Found it. The UN radical bias towards Israel originates from the special coalition of muslim and communist countries formed to counteract US power (to which they oppose fundamentaly), and now this powerful coalition doing the same thing against who they grasp as US biggest ally. A more detailed explanation inside.
  2. The relationships between US and Israel are rooted in much deeper reasons mainly shared values and principals and after them interests. There were a years long real friendships betweem some US presidents and Israeli prime ministers which in the head of them are Bill Clinton and Itzhak Rabin. Reducing it to some this or that lobby is an over simplification. The lobby is merely the symptom (in the positive sense) and not at all the cause.
  3. @Raze I am not talking about the members but the sources and who hold the control. I will find for you a detailed explanation I saw in the past. Anyway this organization is well known for its laughable accusation on things that are really bizzare along with his transparent bias against Israel. Too bad you can't critisize fairly without absurd dehumanizations.
  4. Don't expect no response when you put this kind of cartoonishly ironic accusations by the organization controled by mainly muslim countries by the way, under your sophisticated protective shield of "news only". Now return to your news.
  5. No. This is because of Netanyahu refusal to strategically plan how to fill the vaccum in Gaza the day after the war. That is what make Israel more isolated right now. Biden too is mad about Bibi right now. This is not because of the physical actions of Israel, but purely Netanyahu's thinking disability.
  6. Bibi can't think creatively. He is the king of status quo. He just can't think about the day after the war and do any geopolitical moves. He has a real problem in his thinking ability.
  7. Since this war has many components including religious and ideology ones, the perspective you described is part of the complex reality of this conflict. The Palestinians refusal to any compromise throughout the years is, among the rest, out of a fundamentalist religous ideology.
  8. This is not about "war mongering" at all. She has a great common sense in her ability to differentiate between healthier forces and less healthy ones. The biggest war mongers are the ones who give every content the same pass out of poisonous extreme relativism in the best case, or prefer the darker ones out of personal psychological cravings they have when they live under a democracy from birth and take it totally for granted, in the worst case.
  9. @Karmadhi When there are hostages involved, the whole story is different. In the message above I meant to the daily activity of IDF in the West Bank, by the way with an intimate co-operation with the PLO against hamas there.
  10. I understand you feel unconfortable reading this. I live among Israelis I know their thinking. I feel the survival in my body even though I live deep in an Israeli zone, far from the conflict zone. From outside is so easy to fall into the illusion of the big Israel vs the "small" palestinians. The truth is different and much more complicated. They are 2 million Palestinians sitting in an area which is greater than central Israel. There are also 2 more million Palestinians living within Israel (Israeli Arabs) peacefully nearby the Jews - you will be surprised - right fucking now. When you understand the big context in a more balanced way, then you will automatically see that IDF acts in the West Bank are almost completely out of a deffensive strategy (not without problems! but deffensive). Your perception on Israel's actuall doing (as you mention it) will be then changed when you will be able to embody our survival position. Very difficult from distance when you don't have to deffend yourself from terror for 30 years. Most Israelis are not interested in the land of West Bank. This is a fact you can argue with to the moon and back.
  11. @Danioover9000 I am talking about nowadays. The ideologists who want all the land including west bank are a minority.
  12. @Karmadhi They were countless trials of Israel to make a two states deal and it has failed, along with couple of signed agreements in the 90s but the Palestinians chose terror. What has changed in the map is the settlements in which 80-90% of the Israelis are not interested at all.
  13. But you described now only the deep right wing which is a minority. Even the average of the "Likud" (Bibi's party) don't have such a rigid ideology about a land from what I was impressed, apart from a minority of them + two small far right wing parties which indeed have.
  14. @Porphyry Fedotov From the wiki of the book I found an explanation I think is the most plausible: " The historian Benny Morris offered several interpretations for the departure of the Palestinians during the war, in the book "The Birth of the Palestinian Problem 1947-1949" published in 1988. In the book, Morris refutes the traditional Israeli explanation as well as the traditional Palestinian explanation for the refugee problem. The Israeli explanation was that the Arab leaders or the Palestinian leaders ordered or advised the Palestinians to abandon their homes, according to the Arab policy, the explanation was that the destruction resulted from the will of the Israeli government and the Zionist leadership. Morris claims that both explanations are partially correct, but not as a primary explanation. The basic explanation is war, its fears and the shortages it brought are what motivated the refugees to leave their homes."
  15. @Danioover9000 This does not make sense in the context of surviving. This was a civil war Jungle. If you can find the same thing from another source I will investigate it seriously. I won't take seriously the source who engraved on its flag to fight Israel in the communication field and all means are valid.
  16. @Danioover9000 They know it was a war? 📖 Probably forgot this detail. Even without relating to the list of lies. What about self deffense? They know this term?
  17. Actually yes, Arabs. The Palestinian identity has started after Israel has established. See? Me also fell right now into this mind frame trick. This is really about Jews and Arabs who have this land for legit reasons and have to live here together.
  18. @Karmadhi Most of the Palestinians came to the region only a while before Israel was established, as work immigrants under the Ottoman rule. The land was populated by Arabs and Jews who lived here in a relatively peaceful manner.
  19. @Karmadhi There are also dozens of criminal husbands who murdered their wives last month in Canada. Then Canada is evil? Criminals are found in every system.
  20. Maybe it reflects great the feelings of their side, but does not relflect what actually happened, nor do justice nor give any clue about the real motives, fears, intentions and struggles of the second side. For example, it will never mention that the Jews were almost lost at the beginning of the war when their strategy was mostly deffensive, or it will never mention that the Jews accepted the UN plan and the Arabs didn't.
  21. I understand your motivation and your position, but to site the poison machine won't help anyone understand what happened 🧁🔥 Start with a source who is healthy in the way it does not do its all career from dehumanization of the other side using stones of truth wraped up with an Atmosphere of lies.