integral

The math doesnt add up, if there where 100x Judit polgars running around then one of them will break the top 10 into the 2800 level. Carson is a prodigy among prodigies, its again a probability issue to discover them and train them young. Im not talking about adding normies, im taking about discovering the prodigies and that cant happen with out a bunch of random females getting in to the game. The assumption starts with people thinking they know what logical capacity is and that men are going to have higher degrees of it innately. The quality that makes someone good at chess exists in both men and woman to a relative similar degree. Its a matter of motivation and passion to direct the mind to a task. Men are more interested in hyper fixating on one thing and woman are less likely to do that.

Thats literally impossible, you need to drop dead for that story to come true. Woman are highly emotional, its the easiest game there is once you learn how they think.

If you never got any results from your attempts, then yes your going to feel like shit as you think there is no possible way it will work. But once you start getting even 1 result, then you can start to see a slimmer of light at the end of the tunnel and thats enough to keep you feeling good, as the possibilities are REAL, there is HOPE, I CAN DO IT, Its only a matter of time! The pain is bad because you have no confidence in your ability to succeed as your not seeing anything working so far. The solution is to increase the volume, the only way to do that is to keep trying over and over, its a numbers game, if you talk to 100 girls, at least 1 will go on a date with you, its basic probability. But you got to put the work in and go out there and talk to as many girls as you can everyday until you get a result.

I had that issue to, as an athiest growing up I assosciated the word god with religious indoctrination. After Leo set me free still saying the word god out load in any relation to me felt wrong as it felt like I was making my self look stupid, I cared about my image to others. The solution was to first become confident in my understanding so that im able to explain these concepts to others easily and the most important part to feel good about what i know/learned and see its value or truthfulness so clearly that I feel its highly intelegent to say outload. lol. Got to believe in your intelegence! Im smart hear me roar!

Non of does girl where interested in you before you asked them out and you should of felt that. First you have to build interest and have the intuition to know they are interested. Most woman i would never ask out because i know they are not interested, its 100% obvious. So you need to completly relearn how to show your value when interacting with women, because right now your not showing it at all. Dont be mistaken, you are valuable, but are terrible at showing it.

Ye hes going to be expressing a mix of red, blue and orange. During his growing up phase he will make a bigger transition to blue to become more communal and he will learn that real respect comes from being a role model, having integrity, being a man of his word and helping does around him. The person he aspires to be is someone like "The Rock". A man who everyone looks up to, who is large in stature, successful, capable but also a good guy. Also he has a inner circle mindset, you need to get into his inner circle he calls friends to be able to give advice he will listen to.

haha yes he only takes advice from people he "respects" or have proven themselves. Stage red values. ESTPs like working out, that guy has to release his emotions out in the gym to calm his mind.

Ideally you need to cut ties with him and as he gets older he will naturally mature. If hes a ESTP then they tend to respond best to highly agreeable people who have some wisdom to add along the way. ESTP like new ideas but it has to be said with out any possible hint of a personal attack, they also only care about what is practical so the wisdom needs to be within that. Once i was boxing a friend and he was getting frustrated during the exchange from not winning, so I said "its not about winning, its about learning" and his perspective shifted and it stuck within him for life. Might also want to check out the book "non-violent communication".

Well it depends on what your weaknesses are and identifying them. At around 1900 there is a lack of a good opening repertoire that only books can really fill that void, because its not about memorizing moves it about learning all the insights and ideas in that opening and the full games that unfold from that opening, so books will teach you the entire games that emerge from the openings in your repertoire of choice as well as provide new wisdom and insights that will stick with you. For every book you read because of the retention books create your rating can go up 50-100 points per book. Next got to master calculation with puzzles and really only learn to make the first move when your 100% you see all the possibilities, no more playing guessing chess, thats a bad habit. Next got to solve alot end game puzzle to clean that up, as its everyone's weakness lol Next got to take the time and figure out where your weaknesses are and that can be hard to find. Write them down and create a training plan to fix them.

Lol no but I did alot of work to get the tactics rating up to the master range. Its possible to basicly be as good as Masters, IM or GM at tactical solving but not as good at actually playing chess. 2200-2400 isnt that far away from your rating, you can easily hit that mark with a good training strategy.

Good points, Intelligence has a very flued component to it that if there is passion and motivation in a pursuit for something its secrets will be unlocked.

Ah no there is a misunderstanding, they banned Tras-men from getting a Woman Chess Title. They can still get a regular Master or IM or GM title. The idea being a if you identify as a man then your not a woman basicly so why would you get a Womans Chess title? Trans-people can play chess, there not banned.

There are many factors that contribute to that, what do you think it is?

Thats pretty good! Is that in the 3 to 5 minute pool? I got to around 2200-2400

That did not explain the exact intelligences that make someone good at chess, it only reiterated your world view. Judit polgar was part of a family of 3 sisters whos father thought them chess at a young age, Judit reached a top rating of 2735 that is 100 points away from Magnus Carlsons top rating of 2882. She achieved that rating is a male dominated player pool. Seeing how 1-3% of chess players are woman we can clearly see that if more woman played chess we would have some amazing top performing chess players emerging. This clearly shows that what people think is "male intelligence" is there inability to understand what intelligence is and a stereotype gender bais projected onto it. "Irrational" emotionally immature woman can still be good at chess. This should shatter any concept people think intelligence is and how it applies to chess.

How do you know what baseline intelligence is good for chess? If you listen to Magnus and Kasparov speak there not that intelegent. If you listen to bobby fisher speak that will really blow your mind of how "unintelegent" someone can be and still be good at chess. The measurement of intelligence is not that simple and from knowing how chess works i know woman can do it.

I think you need a more solid morning routine. Consider optimizing.

I not citing studies, I know how learning works, IQ has nothing to do with the problem. Woman drop out rates are higher then mens so that indicates a motivation problem, where is that coming from? Woman are literally not showing up as children to play and learn, why? If we got more woman to play the game and keep playing it we will get more GM woman players. --- Edit I've personally played against woman who where clearly highly emotionally unstable and childish overall still manage to play fantastic chess and get a higher rating then me. This stuff is not simple to understand.

Reading does not increase IQ. The active effort of problem solving increases IQ. Reading might raise linguistic intelligence and comprehension skills. Regardless the first chess rating I received was 1100 and in the process of a year and half it kept going up with deliberate effort and self-development mindset until I stopped playing at around 2200+ 2 years after I started. Training plays a massive role. I can take anyone and get there IQ up to 120+ its not that hard. They need to have 1 attribute and its the desire to do so. Where are the studies of them training people to raise there intelligence? If i wanted to i can get a IQ of 200+ on does ridiculous tests just by practicing taking IQ tests. So how this translates to chess is if you practice you improve.

Alot of the time people can feel like there ideas are a reflection of them and so when someone suggests alternatives ideas it can feels like a personal attack. Ideally the person introducing new ideas has to communicate it in a non-violent healthy way. When men socialize they tend to require alot less filters and speak more bluntly while when speaking to someone more sensitive its better to first address the feeling dimension. In general the premise of the conversation has to switch from "these are my ideas and does are his ideas" to "we are exploring ideas together".

I can, i see a guy making 100,000$ for every youtube video he makes. Hes distributing pennies.

Men in the population are going to be in career positions or have hobbies that will train there IQ more so they will perform better on does tests. If woman received that training they would represents higher IQ rates. Chess drastically raises the IQ of children, male or female. Its like "hey you been training your entire life for this test, take it and lets compare it to people who have not done that training". Basically what that statistic shows is that if you train for something you get a better performance.

Around 2200-2400, if chess was something I cared to improve at it will likely be higher, I havent play in 15 years as I have other things that i want to focus on.

Again your falling into the trap of gender reductionism and not looking at culture and social drives. If you look at black culture in the west there is a strong emphasis on basketball while white people have a stronger emphasis on soccer, hockey and tennis. So we get alot of black people playing basketball disproportionately. Its like how religion spreads. That does not work because what matters is the emergence of new players, what is being underrepresented is the woman who would of been prodigies are not discovered. If out of 1000 kids 10 are woman, and only 1 out of that 1000 develop a actually career playing chess or is a prodigy, it will likely be a male. If the distribution of kids is 500 males to 500 females and only 1 is a prodigy who develops a career in chess then the odds of that person being male or female are closer to 50/50. If we factor in gender differences maybe the odds are 55 to 45, in favor of men.

The ultimate orgasim is awakening and one day youll save the world one orgasm at a time. ?‍♀️Buddha was a Prince after all.