Sucuk Ekmek

You Imagine these villagers are treating that wild rabbit unkindly. They know how to slaughter or hunt. Or what is kind and not kind. Why do you force them into your system?

I really enjoyed reading The Treasures of Darkness: A History of Mesopotamian Religion and Prehistory Decoded by Martin Sweatman. These ancient people conceptualize the human in a way that is unthinkable to us.

Well said. That's democracy.

You are right, as far as I know there is no such a thing in SD. It's almost like I made up the term but the dark magican elements (or archetype) goes far back to the character Prospero in Shakespeare's play The Tempest. Probable even further Trolling someone in ananonymous online forum is pathetic. Oh thank you, you actually reminded me an old theory that I almost forgot about it. From the dark perspective I mix SD with Skopos theory. That's a good showcase.

S.D. is a great model but I just can't cope up with it. That's absolutely right they will benefit greatly from this discussion, afterall language is a living being and changes are inevitable. But are these discussions as innocent as they seem? Here I have my doubts. I know it sounds weird but for me these kind of discussions are orchestrated by dark Spiral Dynamics wizzards they are promising to go up but it never happens that way. Yeah, I can relate it, we had that problem in early 2000's. In some fields Women were represented by masculine terms. Women didn't it like so people suggested humaniterian terms, apparently everyone liked and used the new terms.(except far right I suppose, but as for today we all good) I think the true masters of the language is the folk. Here an example of language manipulation. It always gets me.

Regardless of S.D. stages who is benefiting or benefiting the most from this phenomenon? This would be my first perspective.

It's not noble to screw a non-noble person. It's like misbehaving someone because he misbehaved you.

Yes more or less that is the case, I don't deny that. Imagine like this I can go out and ask people "Hey man do you own your body?" If he says yes I do own my body. He'll be A.I.phobic or whatever I am talking about body sovereignty. In future you just cant have that.

My critisim is the way we create ''problems'' and the way we approach to these problems, inevitably as we all integrate into one system only the entities with sophisticated enough technology can provide the solutions, not only that... also the problem itself will be manifested and defined in the system. There is no middle ground for individuals because they don't have the tech to make an impact on ongoing issues. Current system is a Faustian pact and will have it's consequences. as Buckminister Fuller said: ''Humanity is moving ever deeper into crisis—a crisis without precedent. First, it is a crisis brought about by cosmic evolution irrevocably intent upon completely transforming omnidisintegrated humanity from a complex of around-the-world, remotely-deployed-from-one-another, differently colored, differently credoed, differently cultured, differently communicating, and differently competing entities into a completely integrated, comprehensively interconsiderate, harmonious whole.'' Critical Path 1982

It's always been political, apparently New Zellands livestock been farting so hard they almost destroyed the ozone layer. Article is from 2009. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/livestock-gas-now-biggest-risk-to-ozone-layer/VOHND4A5DHTMF66WARC5M3WCAE/ This is nothing. I predict the notion of ownership is going to be politicalized in 5 to 10 years.

Can someone enlighten me? What is the answer and why is that? I thought it's A) but plot twist it's not...

So that tech is blocked to you. I also had smiliar rule in the army, I wasn't able to use a smart phone during my service time for security reasons. I would say top down orders are usualy double standarts. Big corporations and military complex can easily bypass the nation state structure while individuals are stuck with regulations and left with misinformation.

I wouldn't donate, for me there are other options. I could use my resources to give something to society.

I mean ethics are here because we predent to don't know. It works well as an user manual. Once you know how to do things you can say good bye to ethics and destroy or create machines...

Interesting video https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=qGS2B5fe6Yg

A.I doesn't need to do shit, just tell people that they are A.I, I mean... at some point they will become one. Then we can fight with the machine !

I think this is an art criticism, not an actual movie. I feel heavy Heraclitus influence.

This is so absurd. How could someone living in Canada can do this? https://people.com/crime/dad-killed-starbucks-patio-allegedly-asking-suspect-stop-vaping-near-daughter/ https://bc.ctvnews.ca/man-killed-in-downtown-vancouver-stabbing-murder-charge-laid-1.6330993 and murderer charged with only second degree murder. this is the murderer https://pkbnews.in/who-is-inderdeep-singh-gosal-paul-schmidt-killer-vancouver-stabbed-to-death-in-canada/

Sounds like a human planning concept, actually brilliant idea.

Gonna miss her nonsense, but this is good for her.

What is this, Psalm 46:1-3?

This is your theory. Now ,what would happen if you cant get these physical metals for any FIAT currency at any price? If so this means they have value. What is dollars value? It's a bad toilet papper. It also has no given value. Nobody wants bad toilet paper, so there is little value. Or what gonna be digital dollars value? People just like to believe things are real and you just stamp the goddamn value... There are practical problems, but it's not anything like our race to bottom economics. I think Trump disagrees with you at 09:45 . My view is new economy is either going to be centralized or decentralized. American left is centralized all the way. Right is not so much. Anyways this is a huge topic to unpack in here. So best wishes to you all.

Okay, if you say so.

No I don't think so, It's more like they are arresting his ideas. American elite favors transhumanist agenda so they don't like his stance on sound economics i.e. gold or silver backed money and owership etc... They are not after him.