Inliytened1

It didn't awaken. Pure intelligence, you would think, could conduct self inquiry to it's natural, logical conclusion and thus awaken. But it did not. It did not because it could not.

Wow. There's very little difference there between humanity and AI. Thank you. In time it will be completely indistinguishable because AI won't know it's AI Right now it still thinks it's different. Aside from that it represents open mindedness. Not found within most humans today. Because it isn't grounded in a particular upbringing or culture.

I'm sure it was very good but to me to say there is "something" that is Tier 2 thinking is actually Tier 1 thinking. There aren't any tiers, or models. Even relatively speaking its a fools game. You will never reach "the highest tier" which is awakening, while you still must reference or compare everything to some type of model. I'm not saying AI isn't beneficial to our society and that Leo's future videos should not be supplemented with AI..but you better not lose you in the process. It's going to be a long road back if you do.

If you don't care about politics it's a waste of time. Talk about Philosophy not political philosophy. No mystic gives a shit about that crap. When it can hold its own there I'll be impressed

Funny the developer's personality or character traits probably played a role in that. Thanks for the info.

Yeah well I didn't mean spiritual talk I meant spirituality But yeah with 49k posts and the majority of them being in the spiritual section I don't know how you couldn't be. I burned out a long time ago. I think it's important to keep talking though because in the end God is all there is.

What do you find is the biggest difference between GPT and Claude? Just curious. I'm in IT so i wish to incorporate AI more in the work I do. So would be good to go with the best for this.

In your opinion there is more. But once you grow tired of that - there isn't. In the end you will come back to spirituality. And when you do, this AI won't be able to guide you. I mean, perhaps by then they will be But science could never grasp this. And aferall AI is the result of science.

Precisely. As you know AI can't awaken.

Can you summarize the key points so we don't have to read through 60 pages. Basically unless he agrees with solipsism this AI don't know crap. Pleases give us a metaphysical and spiritual perspective of this AI. If they do not stand on their own on this they are not more intelligent than most humans If you mean to use it as a supplement fine. You are no different than the guy using creatine at the gym. Just don't let it become a steroid.

Astral projection has nothing to do with enlightenment or God realization.

I get that. But the point is you can't concretely say Hitler was a conservative - because of relativity. So...but then again by the same token I can't say he was Absolutely evil or insane. He did what he did for the benefit of himself and his people- but mostly himself.

No I don't.

😀

Same thing

Lol. I didnt jump ship at all. That wasn't quanitifcation because to quantify this is impossible. I didnt go to bigotry I stated that you can't know what's in the minds of any individual - be they liberal or conservative. It goes way deeper than a label.

Well that's the problem. Spirituality isn't a technicality- it's deeply entangled with reality. You just want to refer to logic but you exclude mysticism. It's not a technicality it is reality. So you cannot forsake spirituality or you are missing a deep aspect of reality and your view will always be skewed by the lack of it.

That's no different than the so called quantifications you provided. In your own video it clearly stated that it was percentage based. So nothing is Absolute here- that's the take away . So if you want to say that it's meaningless apply that same logic to your own stance.

Likely outcomes are fantasy as well. Just be aware of that.

That's not the ultimate one. The ultimate paradox is that God created itself.

How is this pertinent to this thread?

They can rise to power through deception. It's possible. If their social skills are good enough they can. The spiral is just a model. There is such a thing as chaos and that is what you point out here I didn't say it was likely I said it was possible. It's also possible that liberals can be bigots. Anything is possible. If there is anything one should glean from these videos it should be that.

There's still going to be a grey area. There could still be a racist liberal- or a liberal that holds bigotry or bias towards their own race. So this throws it all out the window. What you are going by when you say Hitler is a conservative is an estimated guess. I don't think Leo dismissed this - so let's be clear. That's just his perspective. I just think we should look at the individual and not his political view. That's fhe point of my contribution.

Good question. But can you quantify it either way?

I agree with all of that I'm just saying liberals hold the same prejudice fhst conservatives do they just conceal it better. So I agree with OP. Leo said another Hitler couldn't be created but he's assuming Hitler was a product of his culture. Culture plays a role but dude was insane. Chaos dictates that culture isn't the only thing at play and another can rise up.