tenta

Member
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content count

    735

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by tenta

  4. Posted

    On 12/4/2019 at 1:59 AM, Bno said:

    Lol ok, if I ever get the chance to I will ask her about this. I'm also only calling her a devil here on this forum since calling her that to her face with less consciously aware people that dont understand our meaning of the word devil watching would not interpret it the same way.

     

    Leo was referring to saying something along those lines to her, not using that specific word, which you would not do because that still wouldn't get you far.

  5. Posted · Edited by tenta

    3 hours ago, LfcCharlie4 said:

     

    This guy has made this into a huge ideology, go through the replies and see, he's also simplified World Hunger to Jeff Bezos just being able to throw money at it, so seems a very stage Green person. 

     

    Saying issues are more complex than they are serves jeff bezos and others like him, it's not just about him throwing money at it, he isn't concerned with that because it isn't profitable. Trump isn't a figure of virtue who is trying his hardest to stop climate change but is stopped by the issue being complex, he isn't even admitting it's real which is the first step.

  6. Posted · Edited by tenta

    Just now, Keyhole said:

    Watching the first three minutes, Shaun does make some good points.  Leo does have an arrogant attitude that has either increased over the years or was always visible but due to his position has become acceptable; deny that and you're a bit blind, eh?  I think he is a great teacher and so I overlook this, but it isn't as if Shaun is wrong about that.  I think that Shaun has misunderstood these teachings, and unfortunately, it is his responsibility to crawl out of his depression, not Leo's.

    The things that he is questioning are valid concerns.  Anyone with a lick of common sense would be questioning these things before delving head first into spirituality.  Before accepting a new way of being.

    Look at the comment sections there is a valid point there that I pointed out in my first comment on this thread

    Even the video about "do I doubt myself" is funnily self biased

    It's not unreasonable to question if a forum is too conformist, devilry corrupting communities, a teacher being wrong and not willing to see it etc. but with that being said this forum is good relative to other places

  9. Posted · Edited by tenta

    13 hours ago, Inliytened1 said:

    You don't realize it but you are proving my point.    

     

    I pointed out that you can say "leo doesn't exist" to PRAISE of him just like you are saying it to the criticism of him, yet you aren't doing this when agreeing with Leo's teachings - you only bring it out when you try to deal with people who disagree with Leo.

    You are proving my belief that you're biased towards defending someone because they made you a "moderator".

  10. Posted

    Just now, Inliytened1 said:

    Truth is Truth.  It is not about one particular teacher.  There have been many that teach Truth.

    Truth is Being.  These guys, as you point out, have not had direct experience of Being before. 

    They still think its a belief.

    It's a shame, frankly.

    They don't know what they are missing.

    Their close mindedness will trap them from ever experiencing pure Being.

    But it is what it is.

    Once I had direct experience of isness I realized its not about Leo, or any teacher....  It's actually about You.  in Actuality there is no Leo, or Rupert Spira, or Eckhart Tolle, or the Buddha, Christ, or any of them.  It's just You/God.  They are projections of your own mind.  This is something that these guys will never get close to grasping - in fact if you said it to them they would demonize you.

     

    Yes it's a belief and you're doing spiritual bypassing, there are smart comments in his comment section such as "People like Leo can’t accept the horror of the natural world so they disassociate even though even if you are personally in a good mood suffering is still occurring across the world".

    By saying there is no Leo, you're absolving Leo as a human of ever being wrong, it doesn't debunk criticisms, you're just self biased and bypassing the criticism. If you use direct experience to say you have validated something, how do you know you weren't just hallucinating or are wrong and didn't account for something? You don't know that and that's a belief

    By the way despite me not agreeing with the guy criticising Leo, Leo has personally admitted to being a narcissist and the banner of the website proves it :P

  14. Posted

    People should have been skeptical in the first place, there are people who spend tons of time and 500$+ to become a moderator on a website (at least we don't have that type of stuff) so why would someone not be putting up a fake front while in a company? This should be common sense but people still fall for it - there are people right now keeping up a false front of virtue while in reality they embody typical stage orange greed, not going up to stage green because they don't want those qualities they just want to appeal to stage green if that. A CEO who says they support gay rights and donates a little bit will keep up a fake front easily to people who feel the need to defend capitalism because their parents defend it, when in reality their actions are against medicare for all, against not having money in politics etc.

  15. Posted

    On 11/26/2019 at 1:54 AM, outlandish said:

    </thread>

    Locked, we have far too many of these threads of this nature already.

    Internalize what @Michael569 and others have to say, drop this redpill-mgtow-incel junkfood, and start taking actual steps to improve your situation. No one wants to hear you whine on here.

    edit: unlocked, by request. I know we can do better than dwell on this poison though people. C'mon.

    What if your improvement will only be hindered by denying some of that stuff?

  21. Posted · Edited by tenta

    7 hours ago, Bno said:

    Let's way out the pros and cons in the perspective of reducing human and environmental harm.

    Cons:

    The dictatorship continues in NK.

    Pros:

    We reduce the chance of nuclear catastrophe (i.e., possible human extinction and exacerbating ecological damages)

    May I add that South Korea is happy that tensions are reduced.

     

    Then you're completely stuck thinking like this, you're fucked, nothing I can say will change this.

    "reduce the chance of nuclear catastrophe (i.e., possible human extinction and exacerbating ecological damages)"

    Read above, that is a completely biased strawman of the situation.

  22. Posted

    Just now, Bno said:

    When Raegan met with Gorbachev, when FDR met with Stalin, when JFK met with Kruschev, and Nancy Pelosi and John Kerry met with Asaad, were they endorsing dictatorships?

     

    The US president who is known to be friendlier to dictators, meeting with a dictator to try to be friends with them and make sure a nuclear war doesn't break out (north korea's nukes can't reach the US) that clearly wouldn't have happened anyway, while the dictator is screwing over their people and the western leader has no problem with this, keeping up a front of progress while the dictatorship keeps going just like before: is tacitly endorsing dictatorships.

  25. Posted · Edited by tenta

    Just now, Bno said:

    In other words, you're suggesting forcing a nuclear powered country should be invaded by us? Rewatch Leo's Conscious Politics videos.

    Is Trump going to end the dictatorship? Ofc not, you would not be saying this if you lived in a dictatorship. there are ways to stop dictatorships without invading them.

    Your comment is just mental gymnastics, I never said the US should invade North Korea.