Aaron p

Whoa. Research time @Leo Gura ...I hear people speak and they are strong in their ability to deliver truth in an elegant, simple way even if it is in direct contradiction to mainstream ideas (like the idea of all far lefts being anti-fascist)...these diamonds in the dirt I find every now and again are incredibly powerful, often because of how simple they are. Just so stripped of unnecessary BS. It's like chess. Often the most advanced chess players are only thinking with the most extreme forms of basic logic and simple thought patterns. Is there a broad umbrella term that exists to identify people who speak with such simplicity, accuracy and directness (and subsequently power)? You know, people like us on this site. Ideally the term couldn't be "truth-teller" or "sage" as everyone claims to be a truth teller and sages are often way off in some abstract philosophical realm. I was thinking calling them "people of profound insight"? It would just be good if we had a term for this kind of truth seeker kind of like how "Nonduality" is the term for the core of our philosophical stance...?

You can also use AI to generate and customise freestyle guided meditations/visualisations if this helps Wondercraft.ai

@chess_king @Nilsi

Did you know Jackie Chan's parents met because his mother, "leelee," was an opium smuggler in Shanghai and his dad, real original name "Fang," was a undercover Chinese intelligence operative. Fang arrests Leelee, feels sorry for her, releases her, they fall in love, get married and have Jackie Chan...wtf

@Jehovah increases followed you. You are what I call a powerful truth talker. Keep up the good insights

Haha I like this idea!!!

Would that include nicotine, caffeine, alcohol, paracetamol and sugar? While the term "drug" might not be a universal term that fits these elements, I'd argue the term "addictive compound" is...then the question is only what are the addictive or damaging potentials for each compound

In Leo's video making sense of Jordan Peterson he says that certain political figures can come into existence naturally and energetically to stabilize both sides of the political spectrum...I mean the left was going a bit nuts there for a while (I think it was the left) you know with basically limitless emotional subjectivity and supporting anything because it offends someone...I'd say trump is an extreme form of this. Possibly. Also check out leos episode "when does the left goes too far."

A chilli pepper coated in a thin layer of 5meodmt hcl ;°

I think a person who popularised spirituality most was probably sid. (Siddhartha Gautama aka Buddha) A person who popularised spirituality most in the west is probably eckhart tolle (or Allan watts maybe). In terms of power and accuracy in general...easy: Leo Gura

I think the earth will spin around the sun 65 more times before I'm getting close to death

Check out this movie. I'm from Northern Ireland and we have a history of like bombing ourselves and protestants versus Catholics and paramilitary gangs and extreme violence. This movie is so hilarious because it's about Jackie Chan who comes to Ireland and starts bombing the IRA 😭 The Foreigner 2017

Probably not but I'm radically open minded, so maybe.

Do some research into the biochemical processes of how psychedelics affect the brain and body (they reduce neural blood flow and electromagnetic activity, not increase).. Pilots who experience G-LOC (gravity loss of consciousness) have the blood pressurised away from their brain and have transpersonal experiences. Peeps who get out of body experiences are often seen to happen because of a lack of blood flow to the brain. The brain is theorised by some to be more like a filter that infinite consciousness passes through (being limited and localises by the brain). I think it's called the "filter hypothesis (brain)." So if this is true, consciousness doesn't decrease with deactivation of the brain, it increases.

Well seeing as the human identity is the only thing that fears losing the human identity, and seeing as 5m removes the human identity at powerful levels...eventually you can become completely fearless fearing nothing. I think. I mean if you realise your literally immortal, what are you going to fear lol

I don't see this forum as wasting time. If we are answering people's questions, and getting our own questions answered, making friends and developing our knowledge together it's gotta be an all round winner. Not to mention we're supporting actualized by just being active on the forum

Yeah but being an actualised addict is better than being a Facebook addict. If I'm binging internet I'm Gona binge on actualized over tiktok

Fang looks like he's been hit by a fucking train

Wizard cloak. Boom. https://erosclo.com/products/weighted-cloak-hoodie?variant=43602528698422&utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=paid&utm_campaign=120219887444730183&utm_term=120219887444960183&utm_content=120219887444910183&utm_id=120219887444730183&fbclid=PAY2xjawJveRtleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABp36W8coSUR2un4uexqqVoPZtdtU72mmPJtWIAYU2JUkx_CiLbNNohqg-TAvk_aem_n9vRhlsvI_8QyzpTV8wH6w

Paradoxical. Only one thing can be known, yet it has many faces and features. It's so large that we need to attack it one aspect at a time. Sheer power is my second fave aspect. My favourite aspect is love. I love and I love and I love. I can't wait to enter a limitless supply of unfathomable love and bliss. I tasted it one time...it was so powerful that I had to do a full tactical retreat and recalibrate my entire life. But I seen it!!! I was enlightened for 20 seconds lol 20 seconds. I would say I can't wait to go back, but I can wait. I will wait until I'm fully ready to stomach the full blow

It's interesting because if you look at how meditation is meant to be practiced by an individual, the individual is essentially told not to reject or outlaw certain thoughts or any thoughts in fact even if they are extremely detrimental to the Central mind... As a rejection of the thoughts doesn't stop them from existing but merely pushes them into a state of unconscious existence where they still reside in full force perhaps even in fuller force because of the inability so apply conscious control over them. I haven't done a lot of research with drug decriminalization or legalization but my intuition tells me that the situation in relation to such is similar to that of a meditative practitioner and his relationship with dark thoughts. Rejecting and banning the dark and difficult seems to only result in a loss of control over them. Over the last number of years I have worked extensively to healthily embody the darkest most twisted aspects of my own self and I have found that it's like a vaccine... A little of something bad prepares you for the reality of badness. I know that Leo made a post on his blog about how there was a certain place that legalized or decriminalized all drugs and it ended in the worst epidemic they'd experienced in years. The general conclusion to that experiment was that decriminalization of drugs is not a fix all idea and can actually result in a drastic explosion of harm. I think the question should not be about the decriminalization or legalization of drugs but the education of drugs. And I don't mean implementing a nationwide safety protocol of education telling all teenagers that their brain turns to scrambled eggs whenever they're on drugs... I mean respecting the intelligence of teenagers and seeing that they're going to be able to see through that and even if they don't see through that they're not going to care because they're going to test it and they're going to find that that drugs feel good. What I mean is a deep comprehensive repeating educational format that stops bullshitting itself about the the fabricated notion that most people in their lives are not going to take drugs at some point. My perspective is that education and intelligent education is the real question of how to execute properly not merely decriminalization or legalization alone wxsx

@integral (<- can't delete) I don't Wana step on any toes here cuz I recognise that Ralston is valued by many members here, and I recognise that certain teachers have nice sentimental value with memories and core moments of development... But honestly, and I could be wrong here, it feels like Ralston is a bit epistemically lost himself...just a sense...he talks so much about not talking...you know. I can't even articulate why I feel he is lost in his own epistemology a bit...I just feel it a little

I am nowhere near enlightened or god realised (even though this all seems to come very naturally to me and I have been studying theology from the age of like 12 lol). But yeah I think I won't know for a while but all reports I've heard (which aren't too many) suggest consciousness expands and blows up upon death. Although don't get me wrong I intuitively sense that death feels 100% real. The degree to which the ego feels real is the degree to which death will feel real...so if you feel like a real person right now, death will still feel real. It's almost like there is a second being that is still literally you but it's separate, you essentially give your entire life to this second, way bigger "you" and it continues to live. I *think* ask me again in 20 years I'll have a more accurate answer lol. When death does come just know that it isn't actually bad...and as soon as It happens, theres nobody there for it to be bad for...plus you'll get the best sleep your life. It'll be good. Ps: also keep in mind that we are playing with metaphysical Lego right now. What Leo has done is built a metaphysical skyscraper. It kinda feels like we have no idea what we're actually talking about. At all. But it's ok, cuz we need to progress at our own rate. This stuff is all very theoretical, really we can't know without doing some stuff what Leo did like doing lots of trips and mega contemplation and stuff... Leo: Us: