Etherial Cat

Annie Lalla

@soos_mite_ah I understand your standpoint. Females are often pressured to behave like stage orange males and consume sex at all cost nowadays. Just wait until one who is worth it shows up. 21 years old is still quite young. And conscious guys do exist, it's just that they aren't to be found in every street corner. And forget about it being part of having a survival agenda. I think you are just asking for a guy who's there because he's interested in you beside just penetrating a random moist vagina. This is just having standards on being treated properly during, and after sex.

This is all unfulfilling. It is not "it". Some rock stars have been amongst the loneliest and most miserable persons ( substance dependence, massive ego issues). Getting fucked by women because they are after your money is lonely, and so it is for a 10 to gain privileges for the hope of getting fucked. So why would you feel grief for this status quo? If I were you, I'd pass my way and settle for someone who attracts me on several dimensions. And not be an average sheep.

The notion of value is interesting to contemplate. Surely, stage orange people especially tend to equate value with survival capital. But value isn't solely material things. Here in your reasoning you're tying someone's worth to the ability to generate material value. Ex: "A confident chaming asshole= High value guy " "Hot bitchy dumb girl= High value girl" Value in human is generated in several forms to me. The ability to do or having stuff is surely one, but being is also extremely important. In a nutshell -> without the ability to do there is no being (you can't survive by doing nothing- you need to feed yourself, have a home...) -> with only the ability to generate material value through doing or being a useless hot stuff, there is no being. Or at least no life worth living. In my life, I would have had plenty of opportunity to settle down with loaded guys or chase one in exchange for my vagina. This exchange would simply have generated a life not worth living. Exchanging youth and sexual value for freebies and other material stuff isn't interesting. It is a devilish and miserable way to survive. On the other side, if a man see women only through their physical sexual value, this is also a devilish and souless way to survive. It is objectifying and also the best way not to ever have a meaningful relationship with one. Like the buddha said it , the best path is the middle way. The middle way is a compromise between getting your survival needs and beyond met + the spiritual (being) dimension. So, to some up my point, you need a partner that is both satisfying to you on a survival level and on a beingness level. This is why seeing relationships only through the survival lens is a terrible mistake to me. But it is also delusional to not to take in consideration the basic needs for it to function (survival capital).

@soos_mite_ah There is nothing wrong with you . I know very well the dilemma you're talking about as I've experienced it myself. For us women, it takes a special man to inspire an intense desire for merging in a physical, emotional, intellectual and spiritual level. The sex we can have with such a man will be far over the mediocre stuff we could get with an average dude. The man who has casted its spell on us will literally be able to take us where no one else can. That said, you could also theoretically go for emotionally less satisfying, physical oriented pounding if you're getting tired to wait. In that case, you can compromise and get something "lesser". A guy you find attractive, someone you've grown fond of overtime or something in between. Or maybe someone you're not sure about but who give you some butterflies. Also, having sex with an infatuation can also surely take you rather far (until the mind filter vanish and you're left with an incompatible frog). To be honest, most people are consciously or unconsciously in the range I've just described, unfortunately. Real intimacy and quality love making is rare. Because it requires a great fit. And finding your great fit is hella rare. Most people are oblivious to what is possible in this domain because they are quite unconscious and settle for the mediocre unconscious standard of sex. That said, they can enjoy good sex because they can find people who resonate with them and resonance brings connection. Also, a lot of people are getting off from a form of sex that is based on ego trauma, which can feel very satisfying. This is why you'll find so many fucked up stuff on porn website, btw. In your case, it seems like you're too conscious to find a match which resonates with you easily. It's the problem of many isolated conscious people. I would suggest you to spend more time in high green, or yellow communities to find a suitable partner.

In his video, Leo mentioned lawyers as the premium example for a lack of integrity. Well, while I agree that there are some rotten apples, there are also fabulous ones who attempt to win cases through the power of truth instead of deception. So, here is the french lawyer Juan Branco who used to work on Julian Assange's case. He was also part of the french elite circles, which he repudiated due to his integrity as he was utterly disgusted by the level of corruption occurring and the disintegration of all moral values. After he worked for a while at the CJUE in Luxembourg for 10k$ a month, he went back to live at his parent's flat and was on welfare. Since then, he's been defending for free yellow jackets, and released a best selling book about the corruption of the french elites for free. His book was such a success that despite being available for free, he sold 100ks of copy.

Yup! This scene is, for sure. Integrity in politics:

I would say Leo is a good example of integrity. Actualized.org as a channel and work is definitely a path towards integrity. Leo is maybe not 1000% always grounded in it as of yet (as per what he says himself), but I think he demonstrates it quite often.

Ugh... I think the horrible rape she talks about (which she states has broken her psychologically, emotionally and physically ) manifest clearly in her appearance. The invasive surgeries (without wanting to be judgmental, I think it is traumatic for the body to create such alteration ) she got shows still a difficult relationship towards her body and mimic the violence of the rape energetically . She's also trying to be scary, unattractive, powerful and attract the attention at the same time... and assert that she's the one in control of her body and fate. It's clear that when she starts sobbing and tell everyone how much she hates humanity that she never managed to properly release these emotions. She can't forgive society and humanity for what she's been through... And that's quite understandable because it requires a lot of inner work. Which isn't easy for someone who is likely so disconnected from her center due to the repeated traumas she's been through. I'm of course not throwing the stone at her for not being able to pardon, but it would help her so much...I'm very skeptical I would have been able to let go of such traumas, though. Those who manage to let go of this type of heavy baggages are super heros.

I think the answer to this question creates a lot of debate because make up is multi-purpose. And there is both a personal and social root in it. Let's not forget that all social phenomenon are due to human psychology. Make up is both an enhancer of someone's look and a mean of expression and creativity. It is a tool we have developed as a specie to alter our appearance. In some tribe, men do their make up as well. It shows often status and personality. Sometimes it is also used for other functions as such as both aesthetics and protection. Femininity in the collective unconscious is tied to the notion of beauty. So women are expected to be beautiful and also want to feel beautiful for themselves. Most of the time, I use make-up because I want to pump my looks and create a singular visual. When I succeed at achieving that, it makes me feel more confident. Men aren't necessarily involved in the equation, because I can do that knowing I won't meet anyone. It's just me and it helps me feeling beautiful and feminine. Also, I've been so used to the standard of make up in society that I find myself to look "sick" when I don't wear any. But make-up is also expected. It has both became politeness and an obligation in some social spaces. Why? I am not sure. I think here again it is multi-causal. Regarding men, most men will prefer a girl with make-up than a girl without. Sometimes, I read guys stating that they prefer girls without make up or with little make up, but it is because they probably mistake minimum/minimalist make up for no make up. Seduction wise, I feel more confident when I feel beautiful and feeling beautiful, due to my conditioning and my knowledge of social expectations, involves make up.

What about lesbians who put on make up ?

We need more informations to assess your situation. There is likely something going wrong if you've got to pursue him. Especially after sex. I would stop pursuing him now and let him do the heavy lifting. If you've been contacting him and he's showing low investment in his replies, you should start considering you're dealing with someone who might be not really interested or do not want the same things as you.

? Jeez, that's one hell of a dreamy gig you've created, there @Leo Gura. The thought of someone getting paid for watching and clipping your work qualifies as "best job in the world" material. There will be a really lucky person out there.

Becoming president doesn't necessarily give you the cards to do all the move you wish for. You've got to compose with existing forces and be strategic. Obama was supported by the democrats. The democrat electorate and its big donors are overwhelmingly white. While more open-minded, I'm certain that taking strong measures to try to undo systemic racism could have been widely unpopular. It's even likely to have fueled the Republicans. Imagine the shitstorm that would have come from actively trying to push reparations, affirmative actions and other type of strong anti-racist campaigns. Not to mention that even without that, Obama's presidency didn't have the chance to have a collaborative house due to the Rep blocking most of his policies.

? I'd be dying to see the Californian version as well.

It comes straight out of a think tank or from folks with sharp political knowledge. They play that target audience like a fiddle. It's clear they have a fine understanding of its psychology, values and how to emotionally manipulate it. If you'd have told me to make a parody of what would be the perfect political add for republic texans, it would have been very close to this. It's quite disturbing to see how cynical these politicians can be. That's pure devilry.

@NOTintoxicated yup. I wonder how come he's been posting there for so long.

Hmm. I would say it definitely contributes to do so. I picture the structure as a container for the content. You can get good result to disidentify the consciousness by working on the structure or on changing the content. For instance, when you are watching your thoughts you're doing both a work on the structure and on the content.

@soos_mite_ah You're wonderful. I'm getting so excited for the future of humanity when I'm reading such a thoughtful and smart youngster.

I would say energy. There is both a rigidity to it in the form of structure and then there is some sort of tainted consciousness content in it. At least, this is how I picture it.

It depends what type of vulnerability we are talking about, I guess. If you take for instance Eckhart Tolle as he's offering us his authentic self without passing by a persona he's being vulnerable from a certain perspective. But at the same time he can do it because he's so well grounded in his true nature that he has become unshakable. I think the authentic self is what we are on the soul level. Or if not directly, perhaps it is the natural expression of our personality when all traumas are removed. At least this is what I meant by it.

No, it wouldn't be ego. Our true nature is openness and vulnerability. But this is most of the time obsfuscated by layers and layers of ego to protect our nakedness when we aren't able to trust others. Have a look at how enlightened masters are for illustration. Also, without being enlightened some people do not have tons of traumas over their authentic self and are more wired toward this openness than others.

It depends what you mean by "telling what to do in bed" I suppose. There are varying degrees when it comes to how you could interpret these words. I surely need to keep a certain amount of autonomy so I can basically do "my art". Of course, this could make me crazy. I have no problem with the display of masculine energy. But as I see lovemaking as an interplay between the masculine and the feminine, I would not enjoy a cascade of order or a recurring pattern of just being told what to do. It seems that I just really don't have this kink. Being objectified for me would be the moment when I'd lose what I need to feel comfortable. It is really what happens when you're not considered anymore as a person but just as body without any care for who you are and how you are feeling. There is a loss of connection and view of how you are doing. In my case, I find this type of sex and behavior repulsive. Not only on my end, but also on the guy's end. To me, it shows what I'd perceive as a loss of control of his impulse and a break of my trust. But close to that, there is the feeling to surrender to a man's lust and passion for your body while being subjectified. I might be a bit twisted, but I really like it when I see a man battle up to stay in control of himself while being overwhelmed by lust. There is something powerful which emanate from seeing a man fly close to the threshold between his pleasure and being excessive on me. It's a bit like the metaphor Emerald used with the lion tamer and the lion. I feel like the perfect partner would be showing up an awesome show of lion taming and lion behavior. Yes, I have already watched this video. I just believe that these part are ego and the authentic self always wants to be seen.