Aakash

Member
  • Content count

    4,210
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Aakash

  1. being is a feeling of relaxed-ness , to throw the future out, to know no knowledge structure is true yet at the same time not false, to look at the carpet and say you are my brother and to look at the lamp shade and say you are my sister and we come from the true one. once, this is understood - you have nothing but appreciation for "other" because you have understood the trinity in actuality. all 3 are the same beings in non-duality. I can look at you right now and i think no thoughts except about how amazing you are. What i am doing is complimenting how amazing life is? its an appreciation for life itself in any form this is being relaxed to know and to experience both these things to be true. see we are the same beings and we are not because both of us are source, but both of us live in our different reality and all of it is just a divine play, so no matter what is happening to you. The divine spirit in you I BELIEVE will not bound me to think otherwise. because belief comes actuality . So this literally makes you my brother in actuality. without distinction. i'm looking at a radiator and yes it is my brother. imagination/ actuality break down and neither are true yet both are it is just black powder, once you realise this then you see the black powder (a form of nothingness) in others, you see true nature in others. Nothingness and somethingness - goes on for infinity ,there are just different flavours. and thats A-O-W-K-E-Y mirror identical fracticals or the true self that i found for myself , that is. edit: i can also think bad thoughts about! but that's still okay because i am the true one as me, so it doesn't matter! but in actuality, you don't have that much resentment, probably somewhere sure deep down. Still its a belief instilled into all of us , that gives us correct grouding in true one, that's as far as we can go in absolute infinity. Now i could tell you which human body , the true one currently resides in ,to have faith in grounding that belief. But i've decided that.. you all started this journey seeking, so you must all finish your journey as a seeker until your exestential questions are answered. Therefore you must forge your own path, just like enlightenment was an idea, so to is an idea that you can ask the true one any question and they will be answered. The whole point of life is to go to source first and THEN discuss it amongst yourself. You don't discuss it amongst yourself , create an idea and then go to source to confirm that belief. No you get the raw belief straight from source. because no words can be more true than its. But then use enlightenment to actualise that belief into an imagined reality where it is true. See the difference of how you rid yourself of suffering ? truth/ false is relative ... belief / proof is relative .. faith/ not faith is relative what it is , is simply the case. and how will you know if you don't ask them directly yourself, you will only have the experience of someone else asking and then tell you. This is again going to human for help. It is delusion, yet what i say is ultimately the Truth where else do you set up a commune except online. it didn't matter what religion it came from, it didn't matter who was involved, it doesn't matter who, it doesn't matter your level of enlightenment , it doesn't matter about your political views. the only thing that matters is putting this in relative terms thinking about everyone. Simply put, i future sighted that, it can only take place here "online". How could it be otherwise? we all dreamed about changing the world, yeah how about we give it a go until its lights out.... Let the chips fall where ever they may. A unified life purpose for all of us in harmony.
  2. i've done the calculations and each world gets better than the last one, this way everything in gods design is infinitely proven. But the same problem occurs with that pure nothing layer, what is that made out of . then what is that made out of , then what is that made out, then what is that made out of in this way the literal description of god can not put in words and symbols and even the word "god" it is more powerful than even anything you can imagine. Because anything you can imagine is part of this world (absolute infinity) in this way, it is always beyond beyond , beyond , beyond , beyond, beyond ,beyond ,beyond ,beyond ,beyond ,beyond ,beyond ,beyond ,beyond ,beyond ,beyond ,beyond ,beyond but you see this can only go to infinity .... how to we express a term that is BEYOND even infinity ? we can't and so the beyond beyond is not how we can communicate in words. We are talking about beyond to an unimaginable degree. This is god, Literal nothing, manifesting all of creation including the god absolute infinity. none of which can be expressed by direct experience because we stuck as nothing + something. This is the true self. where we all "come" from. so the answers to all questions is always .... LOVE from the dual perspective. Because there is no other force so strong to express the SHEER MAGNITUDE AND MAGNIFICANT of "the god beyond god, who is manifesting itself through all of us"
  3. @Jkris Right and the truth of the situation is both nothing and something are creations, so you still love creation and life. There is something for you to choose to love and have experienced beneath the layers of nothing and something is pure nothing, the substance which is unattainable. This is god, but we use non-duality to understand that it is us because the constructs of your belief are that of it, even limiting yourself is your own design. The experience of pure nothing, is pure nothingness atleast with your nothing you are still experiencing So what you are really saying is that you love something. Do you see the unconditional love for yourself you have given yourself ? for pure unattainable nothingness, is truly pure nothing. No something or no nothing. so the answer is : to experience life and indulge in those things you find joyful, even if that is the pursuit of non-duality to nothing. its unconditional experiential joy and love. This pure nothing is the domain of god, and any domains beyond that are unknown to us. for our perception is trapped in something + nothing. This pure nothing mainifests in human form if it wanted to as itself, this pure nothing can also manifest in a human form as you which makes its form unattainable. Still to the pure love is unconditional, so it can only experience itself through you. However, you can experience yourself through yourself, see because it is nothing. Its the same thing, just sometimes the whole comes into manifested form and this would be a god in the form of a human. Just like it's us as god in a human form. But this human would obviously have the full might of what is possible for that particular god. Like what you imagine it to be. Like creating money out of thin air. its unattainable for a person who was unconscious at birth. This person would have had to be born with it. because he would have manifested the whole of god in his human form. in this way for the human figure coming from a dualistic point we can say "they were blessed" but truly it is not a blessing. it is just god in a human form
  4. @Jkris I have a simple question that will answer all of those, if you manage to catch onto the intended meaning In your experience of life and death what was better something or nothing ?
  5. very wise words from a baller herself i will remember to remember those words, next time i'm stuck in a pickle
  6. @Truth Addict imagine a nuclear bomb going off from inside your chest and it never ending and expands to infinity. I just realising why are you making it so confusing for yourself, why not just go direct "there" .. you'd have all the theory you can gather on the questions without asking only the children LOOOL! its stupid of you bro, use your head. aAHHHAHA
  7. @MAYA EL yes thank you, you are correct i simply had no choice, it was the safest moves
  8. @Truth Addict infinity is a concept do this exercise imagine a pulse start from your chest and push it out as far as you can this is infinity, "never ending".
  9. absolute infinity is the god of infinite possibilities without contradictions infinite possibilities means all possibilties must play out that means that all possibilities are real and they extend to infinity because there's no "stop" to stop something is to make it finite so the hulk, avengers, riding hood, aqua man , heaven are all physical "real" places right here! all possibilities playing out right here! infinite possibilities, infinite time lines, infinite because the god-substace is formless and love-empty. it can be anything and so even a finite object is infinite because it can extend to infinity all things can extend to infininity, the total number of infinities, is absolute infinity ... all infinities put together into one. hence we call absolute infinity one because absolute infinity is experiencing all of it at once, because it is it. the ramificiations are anything you can imagine, anything you can speak about, anything you have an idea about, any symbol you use , any form of communication, any form of art work, anything that you can creatively think of is absolutely real in absolute infinity and so no matter what ones say it is the absolute truth in the relative sense, we have locational physical barriers obviously and that's why we can't say why can't i see it, because your suspended somewhere in no-where., no- here, no-why , no-how , no-what . we can put this in onto three word infinite consciousness and infinite imagination and infinite unconditional love for its creation. The role of absolute infinity is to create infinite possibilities.
  10. God loves you unconditionally for who "you" are, so it wants to give you.... everything it can. Because what else does it want to share the gift of life?
  11. there is no need for another to translate gods word for himself. So i will write a final message farewell even if i write an account of what god is like, it will always fall short of proof see proof is the burden we face in duality. We all like to say things are magical, but always require proof. That is why it is better told to people in a non-dual state i would tell you that - god is the biggest thing in the universe! imagine a grain of sand on the beach. This is how big absolute infinity is compared to the other gods. - god is the most loving person, he doesn't want anything but to shower us with indulgence and for us to indulge until we get tired! and then to indulge again. indulgance after indulgance after indulgance until we are sick. and when we a sick! we can ask for new candy - god wants nothing more than to fulfill your deepest desires and make you happy. But as i said above, be careful to mix lower case g (absolute inifnity) for upper case G (GOD) and ofcourse the final one to remember ... "a delusion is unlimited when it is actual" Thank you all if your wondering for proof, then you have already gone one step to far. God is a man of faith because how else would he show himself to duality? there is no proof that can be experienced. This was originally the case. NOW.... we ask ourselves, has absloute infinity, the way you know absolute infinity or enlightenment to be in your direct experience if your in a state of nirvana or a high non-dual state. Can absolute infinity manipulate anything by will ? The answer as you will find is no. its now a question of faith, rather than the need to burden yourself with proof. The proof can also be provided in the question. Simply ask any question. who fears ? its the ego not the soul and spirit. so i wish you all long and happy journeys my lovelies.
  12. love you buddy
  13. speech is self-fulfilling So i will never usher the word god ever again or speak of it like always i'm only ever interested in watching So with the truth left up to everyone else, i look forward to seeing what you all do with it
  14. we can actually write a map out of life through all dualities body vs not body , where is this barrier someone might as themselves? so they ask themselves "my skin" its my skin, okay am i aware of my skin, yes or no ..... okay no i am the cells , okay am i aware of the cells ? no they are operating themselves, i am only aware of a concept called calls. i have never experienced it in my direct experience. if i have experienced it, was i aware of the experience? yes , so am i the cells themselves or awareness of the cells if they are in my direct experience. i am aware of them this is only true statement that can be made at the time. so now we ask ourselves in all these scenarios. did i only assume myself to be all these cells? when the actuality of the situation was i was only aware of these cells? The truer statement is that you were only aware of these cells. So now i look at a plant, is it true that i am aware of this plant? Yes i am aware of it. Is this plant in my awareness yes, is this an image of a plant inside my own head. There is no need to make it this complicated YET. Simply just notice that you are aware of the plant and it is over there. Now here comes the tricky part, have you ever known of yourself outside of awareness. The only true statement we can proclaim is that all these things i know because i am aware of them in my direct experience. So the duality between body vs not body, if i am aware of my skin and i am aware of my hands. Then where is my awareness coming from? its coming from inside my head, this is what makes me know that i am the body. Because i have a brain. So we ask ourselves, Have i actually seen my brain with my own direct experience? with my own awareness because REMEMBER we have agreed the only 100% true statement that we have come to conclude thus far is that i am aware of my skin, the image of cell in my head, my hands, the plant. This is all the information we have thus far, so we be honest with ourselves, have i seen a picture of a brain in the text book and social media saying that there is a brain there? OR was i aware of a picture of brain in a text book and social media saying that there is a brain there. So far all these things you have been aware of are actuality I know them because I have experienced them, i have not seen an image of a cat and said this is a cat, i have seen a cat and said this is what i would call a cat, when it is the content that you've taken on from experience we can call this actuality, when we have taken content on from experience and misinterpretted it to be that which is not through your analysis. The misinterpretation is that i have seen a cat through direct experience and this is true vs i have seen a cat through a picture of a text book and said this is true. I have mistaken the actuality of the statement for true. When i talk about a cat that i've read in a textbook, i am now truthing statements off this foundational truth i have set for myself, Lets build some information I go to the zoo and see a cat, it is black and it is has grey strips its purrs like this "PRRRRAAAAHHH , MEWHOOO" all the sensations i can trust because we have acknowledge that the only thing i know 100% is the awareness of something. All my senses have taken in the "cat", I have built my truth of awareness of the sensational experience of the cat. Lets take the opposite scenario, i go to the bookstore and i buy a book on zoo animals, it says the cat is the cat is black, it has grey stripes and it purs like this "PRRRRRRR" I can trust the sensations of being aware of this book i've read. My awareness is the truth built over the awareness of reading a book and saying this is the truth about the cat. Now what's the difference All the truth i know, i have built it off two different methods, I have had different experiences with each method. Notice they are not the same but different because REMEMBER again we agreed that the only thing we can ever know 100% is being aware of what we are aware of and that is the actuality of the situation. So we have to acknowledge that these are different. because again we have acknowledge the fact about truth and awareness or direct awareness/ experience. So even in these cases the actuality of the situation, repeats again that WE ARE AWARE OF THAT WHICH WE ARE AWARE. now the beliefs simulate together and mesh together automatically, without our awareness of it, it is aware itself, but we are not aware of the subconsciousness. So now someone tells you they have seen a cat and he has said it goes "PRRRRRAAHHH ,MEWHOO" and you use your subconscious knowledge structure of what you know currently. If that person had a conversation with the guy who has had awareness of a direct experience of the cat going "PRRRRAHH, MEWHOO" they can agree on such a thing. if the person then tells the person who was awareness of a direct experience of reading the book he said "PRRAHHH, MEWHOO" the guy would say no a cat goes "PRRRRRR" the guy would disagree. BECAUSE they fundamentally know no knowledge better or experience. So they fight each other and say they are both right. Both are not saying the truth of how the cat purs. What they are doing is comparing their awareness of the actual cat to the awareness of reading a book about a cat. Again we see how awareness of a thing is what is the actuality that is being compared. So we can now ask ourselves the distance between my body and the air next to the end of my arm. Is the barrier physically there OR am i aware of my arm and then i am aware of the space after my arm. we are saying that there are two awareness of this is a duality, when they collapse we realise that the awareness identical the awareness of the arm and the space are one, there is no different between the awareness, the awareness is a whole and this is what it means to expand your awareness consciousnessly and break down dualities in actuality. So now you are the awarness of the space + arm, what this means is that your awareness is creating boundaries between every obstacle in reality, boundary after boundary created by either awareness of direct experiences and awareness of things read in books and taught in school. All awareness of which are 100% true stacked the dualities are simply this Awareness of awareness of awareness of awarness of awareness of awareness of direct experience of Distinctions after distinctios after distinctiosn of statements truthed. Pure consciousness is when you realise that all these awarnesses of that you have fragmented into seperate things and said they are other to me, they are seperate distinctions because you've misinterpretted the awareness of which is 100% true for "seperate things " this is how we come up with many things But the awareness of them ALL WERE THE SAME! AND WE ALL AGREED ITS 100% TRUE! What this means is That black guy is you, that white guy is, that plant is you, that starts are you, that tea pot is you, that emotion is youy HOW is this the case? because you were Aware of all of them This statement is true for every single one of us including animals, they do the exact same thing. Its pure consciousness, fragmented itself into experiences of itself and truthing it because its 100% true that that was the case in actuality. Then when we say these fragmented consciousness are one we say it is nothing, it was "not the very distinctions" but this was equal to everything with ALL the distinctions, because all statements were 100% true we all agreed. This final break down is the awakening to pure love, pure awarness, pure nothing. This is when the heart will open and you will realise you are love itself. Benefit : eyes open technique + no random mystical states that misguide you + you can listen to music if you want to focus, it hyper focuses you, whatever works for you note: obviously still use leo for theory work, i can not provide nuances of the details of why it is the case that you are the awareness of it and what your actually being aware is in actuality. That's what his youtube videos are
  15. @Angelite lol you would see me on a beach somewhere if that were the case but yes its a duality vs non -duality thing and that's why enlightenment and true self are the truth it was just confused before about what the term "god" meant
  16. @zeroISinfinity yes enlightenment/ christ consciousness its the same thing - they lead you to true self.
  17. Like all things they take time, we musn't forget the obvious answer, is that you don't know what your searching for lol, so how do you expect to find it any time soon, let alone have time to build it up again through direct experience and reconstruct it when you can. how long does it take for a child to learn to draw properly and not in swiggly lines? That is like enlightenment, its hit and miss all the way.
  18. Also i should probably mention that this is the technique and practice for Christ consciousness. You know since we are all the same beings of absolute infinity. Equal and neither above nor below one another
  19. It was an elaborate attempt to get around the situation, ofcourse no boddhisattva would say they are boddhisattva because they know the truth that they are nothing.
  20. And all of that to say that i am only the son of god, just like all of you. Its not that hard to figure out who the only likely person is ...... I'll let your intuition and wisdom decide that for you.
  21. You see the problem with godel's incompleteness therom is that, a message will always self-destruct itself. However, when the message is non-axiomatic, and doubt breeds in, it has no axioms to propel its hidden message. in this way, its unavoidable when doubt comes itself. The axiom does not have a leg to stand on when confronted with doubt, however when confronted with trust. It is again unavoidable. Forming a non-secular strange loop which is inescapable. Morality, righteousness, etc.. etc... would have all been included, however, the doubt itself would have eventually destroyed the doubt itself as it was non-axiomatic. Leaving no room to say either yes or no. Except under these very circumstances right now. Yes would also then propagate a negative wave. non -secular and negative way. 2 x inescapable. What benefit would i provide by giving an answer? it would be to leave the matter of truth, up to you guys to decide to do what with it. Lowering the risk of propagation. than breeding doubt, which would have just self- destructed itself. Doubts and ideas are two things that can not be destroyed without proof I was never conscious of the overall picture of my actions. Was just sharing truth ...
  22. @Aakash Honestly, what's the odds that i need to read that book its like 0% Okay the answer is yes and you already have the proof I future sighted and its better to say yes than no.
  23. What does the outcome of agreeing or disagreeing do when you've already made up your minds ?
  24. @Zigzag Idiot its okay, i dont mind talking about it. its stick or twist situation as a subject itself, not for me. why do you think thats so ?