Aakash

Interesting analogy , I do agree myself. As a person who feels life is nostalgic at this point in time. Everything feels like grabbing a iron bar. But this is still from a human vantage point and not a person with a secured awakening for starters

@Serotoninluv I editted it again to show you why I said it. Absolute infinity is infinite, you can only capture it in words and symbols. [Absolute infinity .... ] period but I don’t like saying this. But I can’t help but speak direct truths. I wonder does this make me a good or bad human. My feels tell me a bad human because what does the future matter. What does ending suffering matter. I dunno. It over steps my own morality

@Serotoninluv I editted my post ,

@RendHeaven words are truth there is no escaping it some may not have the experience behind it and therefore conceptual. But when the experience is correct the word is pseudo- correct. A partial truth none the less, a partial truth relatively equal to the colour of your hair. And yes I am aware of what a symbol is unfortunately. The irony here is, what is the facet itself but a partial truth itself. Even if you have the awakening to a truth, it’s partial. So my point is that due to the total absolute non-dual nature of absolute infinity (the whole thing) words contain absolute truth because words are partial truths, that point to partial truths.it can never point to the absolute truth. Which is for me, the summation of a few facets. Non duality love emptiness duality intelligence self love and passion. This is my preferred enlightened being for me specifically.

@winterknight to be honest, I give you homage for taking emptiness to its extreme. It’s a bitter sweet pill for people to swallow. Not that I would agree to such an extreme personally. It’s very soothing for myself to experience a conversation with you

@AlldayLoop the mis analogy is that the seeker itself is the one your seeking. Meaning how do I tell you that you are the very thing itself lol just the way you are there are two “I” when there is only one. Which “I” wrote the question the answer is one of them, both of them. To wintersolider the answer is 1 and to others the answer is 2. Both are correct. Edit: but it’s a winterknight said, truth must be realised as experience not cognised. Let’s say I know the absolute truth about absolute infinity. But I haven’t experienced it and so there’s no sticking ground.

@cetus56 lol shizzzzzzz I just got the answer to the riddle. It’s actually solvable!

@winterknight the irony here is that he’s saying his facet sets are better than your facet sets and then calling you ego for it. When none of you are. You just both have different facet sets and depthness. The facet competition here is extreme absolute love vs extreme absolute emptiness

@zeroISinfinity it’s not about complete understanding that’s the impossible. From my perspective it’s about doing what’s right and what in my opinion should be honoured. In all honesty, I’m not sure where the idea comes from. What beliefs have lead to such an argument. Maybe years of searching, maybe hours put into ranking the highest truth. It just feels like the right thing to do, to pay homage to absolute infinity for hosting myself. Life has become nostalgic. I just do what I do for the sake of truth really. I guess my way is just words its not that as Aakash, I blame absolute infinity , it’s just being .. like the rest of us. If I’m being honest, I just don’t see the point of not giving my words credibility because they are words.

@Inliytened1 by my calculations its the facets of emptiness , love, free will, determinism , duality , non duality , acceptance of science as material duality , acceptance of absolute infinity, acceptance of further awakenings , self love , happiness, joy , peace , independence as a being, no present moment , no life , no death , impermanence, what is reality , what is perspective ,active creative expression , passion for life or a life purpose, willingness to advocate truth, foundational metaphysical knowledge Its the combination of “A” total awakenings in each of these facets. Making it feel like absolute non duality which is oneness. Non duality is different to absolute non-duality. There are probably still a few more

@Serotoninluv so by being, anyways it doesn’t matter. The words won’t fly I understand now. Tbh I’m just doing it off good will, I can’t see what I have to gain to say what I did. A losing battle from the start

@Serotoninluv and How else is the situation resolved ?

To be fair, this was some good advice. Thats all it is, writing off. The worst form of exemplary i guess actuality would have helped more. Kinda like boy who screamed fox lol ♟ looks like my queen has gotten taken in infinity chess. words with no meaning ? ahh well, atleast I tried. Somehow I got it, transmission through being demonstrated. Interesting is the reason of silence. The part I was missing. Must have been what Kieran was talking about when he met the zen master i wonder who im trying to persuade when it’s just me lol and there’s no reason to do so. It is what it is for no. A difficult truth to show.

@RendHeaven lol it was a joke of the obvious truth of the situation. I didn’t mean it literally. Either way, it is what it is. The truth about truth lol not that I mind what happens.

Anyways I would be lying if I said, we should not adopt this system of mapping and recontextualise everything again. The irony here is that it’s not possible for us to do in our current state of consciousness. Mehh, before I was too attached to the idea. Now it’s like it is what it is. When I was conflating the future of my now with actuality. Its like @tsuki he realised he had not awoken to absolute love and took a psychadelic to do so. The process of awakening never actually changed. But I guess your right, there is no compromise with words. Either you conform to what I say or I conform to what you say. It’s a write off ??‍♂️. It took me a long time to find a definitive answer. Whether you want to take a facet to its extreme is up to you. It’s specialisation itself, which is what I predicted would happen in the future anyway. I said this all two months ago. It just took a while to get the confirmation bias.

@Nahm I editted my post, but I don’t not agree with what you said. Such is the problem of this whole thing. So your saying the correct thing to do is to leave it ? As you know I don’t buy into false equivalencies. So at this point in time, I would say your more adept to give a proper answer. the Irony is that infinity is not just a word.

@Nahm who is there to get stung after a certain point ? Is it too much ? What makes it different to what has been said so far ? I can tell you that our deities didn’t. Im probably not sincere, but does my facet lie ? But i appreciate the thought, it may seem that I’m attached. But I’ve come to stark realisations this week away from the forum, that have changed my perspective. Read this passage https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanat_Kumara

@Nahm so why don’t you engage in the write off with me ? Why not write off with me ? BecUse it’s a write off ? But what’s wrong with a write off ? It’s a write off but what’s wrong with a write off ? It’s a write off but what’s wrong with a write off ? Its a write off but what’s wrong with a write off ? Its a partial truth but what’s wrong with a partial truth it’s not absolute truth but what’s wrong with the absolute truth ? It’s a write off but what’s wrong with a write off ? Its a write off and not absolute truth, which is a pointer and therefore a partial truth. But what’s wrong with that ? It isn’t actually it. Then why not devise a system that makes it reflect it, with the experience ? Its a write off but what about when they get the experience of it , the write off was what got them there ? The truth of the matter is you can only say what your saying if you yourself have all the absolutes. Do you have all the absolutes ? It’s a write off but is it ?

Really neat but still incomplete. WhAt he’s advocating is still his point of view as a dual being experiencing non -duality. Do you know what words do not have an opposite “an absolute amount” because a non absolute amount is still an absolute amount. Hes talking about absolute non-duality. Still it’s truthful, but how do you know that seeking more is exhausting and not vitalising for your dual being ? Lets subsitute the words an absolute amount of non seeking is better than an absolute amount of seeking, how exhausting. Now let’s say an absolute amount of seeking is better than an absolute amount of non-seeking, how exhausting. Which statement is more true ? An absolute amount of duality is better than an absolute amount of non-duality , how exhausting an absolute amount of non-duality is better than an absolute amount of duality, how exhausting which is correct ? An absolute amount of love is better than an absolute amount of hate, how exhausting an absolute Amount of hate is better than an absolute amount of love, how exhausting which is correct ?

@Nahm lol but How do you not agree with what I’m saying? What makes you not change your mind ? Well its clear you do. So the question is why wait ?

@Nahm in all honesty, I would say I lucked out to an insane Degree. So these write offs were more helpful than actually experiencing full blown awakenings . Instead they were dwarf star level mystical experiences, turned conceptual over time. Not to be seen again. To the stage yellow being But like all traps, the more you escape ... the new ones you create for yourself. The point is: these write offs map a path to pitfuls but also create new ones like “ 1 step forward , “many” steps back wards” as you would expect, rather than going through trial and error methodology. Enlightened species are very interesting. In a sense, it’s still the dawn of time. But there is a pattern. Waking up randomly, passing on the waking up via teachings. When will be build a grid of words? My love the nests of the absolutes teeming throughout all religions and enlightened beings. Now wouldn’t that make sense to everyone when will you tell me you are an absolute ego. I’ll tell you when. When you find an absolute of “mine” that is not found in “yourself”

@Dwarniel I editted it for maximum impact ahah! ??‍♂️

@Dwarniel I’ll make things simpler. Everything you know is a lie literally and that is basically what the ego is. The “thing” that thinks it knows what it’s talking about for sure. And who is that ? Thats dwarniel. So everything that dwarniel knows is a lie. So if everything dwarneil knows is a lie ? Then what’s the truth.. who is dwarneil? That is the true self questioning itself as to why it built the ego (dwarniel) in the first place. Which you will eventually find out it’s culture and conceptual information that lead you to think your dwarneil.

Ego is in its most accurate sense is a cross reference of two egos Vertical ego which is the degree to which you are not your truest nature. Then you have lateral ego the depth of ego the degree to which you haven’t MEASURABLY deepened a facet. There is a third part, which is cross-dimensional ego. Which is the degree to which you haven’t actualised as many facets as you KNOW of. The reason I say know of and not what is, is because that’s placing expectations to do better upon an already near perfect formulae For example, it turns out I was wrong and Jesus was stage teal. So by these standards I am actually SD yellow. That is my degree of ego density, given vertical and lateral ego. See I overestimated myself. With the traditional level version of ego density I would be turquoise with stripes of it. But the depth of each stage and it’s ego density is immense. Typically this is different to what I’m suggesting people think of as ego. This is my first and foremost new definition of ego. My second favourite definition of ego, was inspired by Leo and his embodiment. It is a high degrees of two facets. Absolute self love and absolute healing. When you try to end the suffering of others through your own understanding. Enlightened beings like to confuse their selflessness with self love and it’s a totally different ball game. This is where I personally see many people fall short because of the third definition of ego, which I personally don’t like. However, it is not to be discounted. Inefficable-less egoness. This is a reliquinish of all doership and all facets. Typically what Buddhist and some Hindus teach as emptiness. The mastery of emptiness is the Absence of a doer. Or in other words, complete absence of anything at all. It’s the extreme depthness of infinity a facet can get into. The ironic ego is therefore denoted as, anything short of a enlightenment or awakening into a single facet. The religious ego definition is any mind construct that believes itself to be a human living a human life and funny ego is the definition that there is no ego. The scientific ego is the portion of the psyche in your brain which leads to your belief and moral systems

First of all, I can say with 100% certainty that Leo has mapped out absolute infinity the best for the 21st century. Over the last day, I’ve found out an ironic plot twist. In all honesty it sounds like the biggest bullshit ever. I actually hate most religious dogma, but I understand it’s origin and so I think Leo’s body of work is the most honest. The correct words are all encompassing. his YouTube account doesn’t do his own experience justice. I don’t really care for arguing whether he’s enlightened or not. I’m just saying your own truth doesn’t do his own truth justice. The statement I highlighted is a false equivalency. There is a difference between being self-biased for survival purpose and being self-biased because you’ve reached a point where your experiences can only guide you, with your own knowledge. The equivalence is telling a baby to watch their diet vs telling a dietician to watch their diet. In the end, truth is truth, whether that was subjective or objective. To which truth is neither. Loving its own self is not an objective. To us it looks like an objective until it becomes obvious that it was just the case. Truth itself exists because it was made unknown to you in the first place by design. Otherwise you would know who you are. The whole point of truth is to find out what it means to be “you” which turned out to be “you are a not you , but rather “you” are actually god or absolute infinity thinking you are a seperate self” and how do we know it’s true ? Because if all seperate selfs were the same, the only obvious conclusion is if I didn’t have a seperate self , what would I be ? An enlightenment experience or an awakening experience is the answer. What ever the is and how many times that may be. So therefore what ever your enlightenment or awakening experience is, is a facet. It is the truth of the matter when you aren’t a seperate self, a false facets. There are major and minor facets for humans. Covering the major facets is what I call the all encompassing ones. Leo has shared the most of these facets, because that’s what understanding is. A facet by which god can understand itself. So to say that the Tao can not know itself is true. But it doesn’t mean you don’t try to understand it experientially. The greatest journeys in life are those never taken. ?