tsuki

Hahahaha, you should~! Open mindedness is a graceful gatekeeper to wisdom hahahaha.

Disclosing a potent unscheduled research chemical to the general public is quite a responsibility @Leo Gura. I can't wait to see how gracefully you are going to deal with it. You are not just going to say 'use it on your own accord', are you?

If anyone tells you fire is light, Pay no attention. When two thieves meet they need no introduction: They recognize each other without question.

Pffft... You're a saint!

I would suggest @Aakash that you open a journal as your thought-dumpster. You can delete it with just one click when you will finally get embarrassed by it.

Nothing can prepare you for an awakening. Enlightenment is the ultimate hero's journey.

Nah, you're too much of a mother to leave him like that. He may stick a fork in a socket, or something...

Honestly, I don't even read everything you write

My coworker was telling me once about a family that had, like, 8 kids. I won't even try to imagine how much work it takes to raise one, not to mention 8. He gave me a funny look and said: at some point they start to raise each other.

The ego is not just a feeling. It is a complex comprised of thoughts, feelings and perceptions that is the illusion of separateness and control/doing. In actuality, the ego is powerless and is always swept along with the currents. If the currents align with its conceptual understanding, then it is happy. Otherwise, it suffers and struggles. The relationship between the ego and intellect is such that ego introduces conceptual frameworks of behavior (morality) that the intellect is "supposed" to follow. It does not. It's true purpose is to perceive/receive Dharma/Tao/Logos. To discern what is harmonious in the present moment. The intellect always does that and the concepts that constitute ego are the ego's suffering. They may have served their purpose at some point in development, but they are to be integrated to the point of irrelevancy. They are a ladder that is used for transcendence and then, thrown away.

sat chit ananda.

If you understand love as your true nature, then acting from your true nature is the ultimate expression of it. To ask 'how can I love more authentically?' is to ask: 'how can I be myself to a greater degree?'. That question cannot be answered, because one cannot know oneself. Knowledge implies a subject and object of knowing, and therefore, separation. To know yourself is to be separate from yourself. Authenticity, love, is being. It is a lack of self-reflective awareness that employs self-referential phenomena (thoughts about thoughts, feelings about feelings, etc.). True love can only happen when there is nobody loving and nobody loved. That requires abiding in the state of not-knowing, by dropping all self-concepts such as 'I must love'.

It is not possible to perceive change. Change is an illusion, so is any 'object', 'place' and 'another'. Note that anything you term 'memory' is always happening in the present moment. Memory is indistinguishable from imagination and ultimately unverifiable by any measure.

Interesting. Take note of the fact that there is time involved in this vision. It is exactly right, time is a misconception stemming from ignorance to rhythmic/cyclic nature of reality. A misapplication of linear thinking, blindness to midnight.

Sigh, I'm gonna have to buy that book...

@mandyjw If you wish to be happy, act happy, regardless of the mental state you're currently in. This is what 'polarization' is. Refusing to participate in backward swing simply means that you do not try to act your misery out when you feel miserable. The pendulum swings, but you do not swing with it. When you go against your conditioned ways, it creates a bodily shock, discomfort, pain. It screams: DO SOMETHING. If you choose to do nothing, you can learn to tolerate it until you stop noticing it. This "resistance to resistance itself" slowly stops the pendulum makes the pendulum disappear. It may take many swings until it finally rests. When it stops, it is put back to motion by 'external' events. Mastery is when you are able to react to circumstances without losing presence. When you are able to ease the circumstantial charge right on the spot by seeing it as arising for your benefit, as a reminder, a centering lesson.

2 warning points to my name for calling a person a fool as a preliminary to making a point (that I never got to make). It didn't matter that neither of us took that seriously and we just had fun. Conveniently, there are no visible signs of moderation other than locking threads. Acting simply - Tao te ching True leaders are hardly known to their followers. Next after them are the leaders the people know and admire; after them, those they fear; after them, those they despise. To give no trust is to get no trust. When the work’s done right, with no fuss or boasting, ordinary people say, Oh, we did it. _____________________________________ This invisible leader, who gets things done in such a way that people think they did it all themselves, isn’t one who manipulates others from behind the scenes; just the opposite. Again, it’s a matter of “doing without doing”: uncompetitive, unworried, trustful accomplishment, power that is not force. An example or analogy might be a very good teacher, or the truest voice in a group of singers. Does a blank piece of paper hide the text? Only if you're a writer to begin with.

Nothing, and that is the point. That is how the mind keeps being relevant, by siddhis like total omniscience. If you push the mind hard, really hard, it will give you everything you want - even godly, or ungodly powers. That will not, however, end seeking. The seeking starts and ends with the mind. That is the only way you will reach the Absolute. The Absolute is beyond God because God is the last face of the mind. All paths converge in enlightenment, such is the nature of seeking. Maybe in another life. The paradox is the bait to unravel the mind. Keep nagging "them" and see where they lead you. Have you ever wondered how many paradoxes are there? How is one paradox different from another?

Paradox is a preliminary stage before deconceptualization. Meta-logic that incorporates paradox is just the mind's way of staying relevant. The telltale sign of this happening is WORDS WORDS WORDS WORDS...

@Truth Addict It's not about the qualms of any particular user. It's about the forum's ability, as a collective ego, to self-actualize. Hmm, maybe I should have used the PM service instead, like you suggested.

Here's an idea @Leo Gura, I wonder about your thoughts on this. What if you opened a subforum for meta-discussions, where users could comment on the actions of moderators? It would be a disaster in any place other than a self-actualization forum. In fact, it is a way for the forum itself to self-actualize.

Deception is the ploy of words. Silence does not pretend.

As I was saying - the only fruitful application of Metaphysics (and Theology, apparently) is deconstructive. Elucidating your petty imaginations about the Absolute for the sole purpose of seeing right through them.

When it's done, you enjoy your peace until a seeker finds you. Then, you end the seeking.