Leo Gura

I don't worry about that at all. People who come here are already bought into the teachings.

I did not code the forum. But I modified it a lot.

The data problem cannot be true. There obviously exists enough data on Earth to create an Einstein or any level of human genius. So the problem is not the data but the ineffective way current LLMS use it. The current LLM approach is brute force. This approach will definitely plateaue. But a new kind of neural network will be invented which works more like a human brain. The human brain does not brute force billions of data.

He's not interested in talking to me.

I am not going to agrue with such people to try to convince them that they are missing something. In a sense, so-called enlightend people are the most closedminded people on Earth. You can't teach them anything and I have stop trying. It is easier to teach JP something than Peter Ralston.

There is little point in talking to them because they already understand. I have nothing to say to them. The point is to talk to people who don't understand God. JP's audence could massively benefit from a proper explanation of God. That's why its appealing. The more closedminded the audience the more it benefits from these teachings, but also the more likely it is to reject them. That's the game here. Striking just the right balance in audience is key.

Your ass is infinite.

@Princess Arabia As a joke your initial comment was ass perfect.

God is so based his pin number is 1.

@Princess Arabia 6969

It is silly to suggest that in order to break up with a guy a girl would invent this "fat ass" scheme. If I was a girl I would be insulted by such a suggestion. Maybe if she's a psychopath.

You don't understand how serious the issue was for her. Stop ass-uming.

No, no, no.

Have you tried contemplating God's pin number?

I def know she wasn't looking to end it.

As soon as I told her the truth she got so offended that was the end. The truth was a dagger to her heart.

Your comment was wrong in that she was not looking for a breakup.

I don't think that will change anything. I would like for it to work, but I might have been too optimistic. It's a very delicate thing.

I don't do interviews on my channel. I am not an interviewer. And Ralston has no interest in discussing anything.

The more I think about it the less I think it will work. The things I would need to say would be so radical he would turn hostile very quickly.

That's another point against doing it. I don't think JPs Daily Wire audience would be open to any of my teachings. They would just demonize me, which serves no purpose. The Daily Wire audience is very brainwashed with Christian dogma.

I thought talking to JP would be an interesting challenge. But I have watching some of his interviews yesterday and the more I watch the more I start to feel that his mind would immediately shut down ans get hostile in such a discussion. He can get quite hostile and stubborn. I am still evaluating to what degree it makes sense to engage or reason with such people. I don't want to find myself in a nasty position of casting pearls before swine. The tricky issue is: with whom can God be genuinely discussed? I'm not sure. The reason I have not done many public conversations in the past is simply because I didn't there would be anyone worth talking to because they would not understand what was being said. And I don't want to be in a position of trying to convince someone to open their mind. These kind of public conversations turn into chess games.

I don't deal in any crypto other than Bitcoin.

I think it's a very dangerous game to play. New Age self-deception like that is very common. If you're trying to make money using such gimmicks, there's something fundamentally wrong there.