Leo Gura

We've heard this nonsense before Iraq. If you support invading Iran, I will support invading Israel and overthrowing all the Zionists.

Regime change in Iran is the worst idea since regime change in Iraq.

Well, I'm just glad Bashar is not a fucking Trump supporter. "Lead" here could mean long down the timeline, not necessarily within 4 years. Like a fork in the timeline. Which is not so crazy. That Trump is a disaster is obvious to anyone with half a brain.

It's awesome. That's all you need to know.

Exception to what? What does that mean? Just because you are more safe online does nothing to help your social life or develop social skills or attract women or develop masculinity. Yes, you are safe online. And you are even safer locked in a prison cell.

@Carl-Richard You make some solid points in questioning the limits of Graves' method and sample size. Susanne Cook-Greuter's model has a much more solid grasp of the highest stages and you can use it to help you fill in the gaps in Graves and SD. The Construct-Aware and Unitive stages are very well described by Cook-Greuter. You can wonder, what would a community/culture of such people look like? That would probably be Turquoise. As for Green, a lot of Green New Age people parrot stuff without a serious development of it as a stage. You can parrot Alan Watts or some guru or some yoga thing, but that doesn't not mean these people have Construct-Awareness or Unitive stages. There is much New Age spirutual larping going on by immature, underdeveloped, deluded people. The people you see at some yoga retreat are not Tier 2.

Is this really true? Source? That's a huge win for them if true.

Nonsense. You are denying the whole game of angling to get the highest value men and the whole screening process that involves. As if that isn't happening. That is the lie. You can play whatever games you like for whatever rationales, but don't then carry that deception into the domain of understanding reality. Anyways, I'm tired of this topic. It leads nowhere good.

That's the trick! Because in reality women sleep around easily and frequently with dishonest players. But the nice honest guys get the short end of the stick. Thus game is born.

All that is obvious. But not just to protect herself. To screen out low value men. Or to put it starkly: to protect herself from low value men.

It's deceptive to any honest rational actor. If an animal behaved that way, you would call it deceptive. Like when a possum plays dead. It takes skill and training to see the possum's trickery. It's hard to get a possum to admit its own tricks.

Because it is deceptive. It's called game for a reason. From a man's POV, a woman's deceptions require deciphering. Of course the woman cares about none of that. This has no import to women. I'm not saying this to women. I'm explaining this to men, so they can have some success. The women don't care about this.

Your games are your survival. Games are life and death.

That's cute, but that's not how women work. The higher value they preceive a man the more they will delay and withhold sex in order to get him invested. And she's not gonna get horny for a guy she's not attracted to. So again all this assumes attraction.

1) Of course by that point the issue is moot. You have assumed attraction, which is the whole issue for men. For women, the pre-attraction phase barely exists. But for men, that is where all the effort goes. 2) Women still play games and withhold sex after obvious attraction.

It's much worse than illegal immigrants. Illegal immigrants don't try to grab land for their native country. It's a deliberate weaponization of immigration, with military, financial, and political support from the state. Imagine if the American government paid 500,000 US citizens to move south of the border, build little cities, and then build exclusive super highways back to the US. And then the US military patrolled those highways shooting any Mexicans who protested and bulldozed their houses. It's like a growing fungus.

He's def more conscious. But that has little to do with how a large organization of people operates. Sadhguru could be the most conscious dude on the planet and his followers could still be raping kids behind closed doors.

Some higher aspects of reality cannot be thought of in an explicit concrete scientific manner, but can be thought of in a more loose, indirect manner.

Sadhguru's minions are def brainwashed, but that's what they signed up for and that's par for the course in India. The whole of India is brainwashed with Hindu spiritual dogma. Becoming a monk is an intense life choice. Obviously not right for most people.

PM is more correct than say a religious fundamentalist who reads the Bible literally and thinks his interpretation is the only objectively valid one. Or a scientist who thinks that science is the best and most objective way to see reality. That's what PM is pointing out as a mistake.

What's unhealthy for society is denying the obvious psychological differences between men and women. When I say man, what I really mean is masculine. If a man is not masculine then what I say doesn't apply. Just because there are feminine men doesn't touch my point. The meta problem here is that people don't understand the proper and important function of generalizations. You tell a stage Green a valid generalization and they instictively try to hairsplit it to death to satisfy their political social justice agenda and worldview.

Sounds like a tempest in a teapot.

It's hard to articulate since it is oblique.

Watch this: Now ask yourself, Does the Fossa logically know how it selects mates? It has no idea. But it is very good at it nonetheless.

Your survival is not logical. You don't know you're doing it, you're just living. There is enormous intelligence in how women screen out low value men. And it's all instinctive and unconscious, such that you'd have to study it for years like a zoologist to see it.