Leo Gura

In online dating the opening line is largely irrelevant. Put all your energy into upgrading the quality of your photos. If you want to do well with online dating, hire a professional photographer for $500 to do all your photos. Your photos MUST look awesome.

Like a video game renderer, you create whatever is on screen right now. So right now you are creating the thought of an alien in some other galaxy. But if you get on a space ship and fly to that galaxy which you imagine, and meet that alien which you imagine, you will be creating that galaxy and that alien. Whatever you see is PRECISELY what you are creating. Nothing more, nothing less. Precisely!

That dude takes cos-play to a whole new level I want to dress like him for a Halloween video.

You got it! Congrats!

Hehehe... that's some fine gaslighting.

The money shot:

Awesome example! Blue as fuck. This dude is straight from the dark ages.

@Nak Khid

?? Roosh is dumb. Gives pickup a bad name. A perfect example of a stage Blue/Orange reactionary against Green. Culture war drivel and toxic masculinity. Unfortunately this kind of ideology is common within the pickup community. The ideology that can come with pickup techniques is like mind cancer. It's utterly selfish and self-biased. Classic devilry and projection.

I have stopped taking any teacher seriously. It is irrelevant. You will only understand by doing it yourself.

Go do something productive with your time.

When you are aware of it, you create it. Feel the hair on your arm. As you feel it, you create it. Awareness IS creation. You are not aware that you are creating Everything. Because you're asleep. All I'm saying is that you CAN become aware of how you designed it. Obviously you're not anywhere near that degree of consciousness right now. Which is why is seems so outlandish to you.

This clip here has a nice explanation of the problems with unlimited free speech which libertarians love to argue for: So what libertarians don't understand about unlimited free speech is that it gets exploited by clever egos to actually take away the free speech of others, leading to an overall reduction in free speech for all. This is a microcosmic case of the larger macrocosmic problem with unlimited freedom as I discussed in my libertarian video. The paradox of freedom is that unlimited forms of it lead to oppression. Which is what libertarians refuse to understand. Vaush's analysis here is precisely correct as he understands the counter-intuitive ways in which freedom can backfire. The guy he's arguing against does not understand this because he isn't taking into account the clever and radically selfish ways in which ego will exploit his unlimited free speech. And of course the hypocrisy is that even that guy must admit of restriction on speech in case of threats of violence. Also notice how the libertarian guy does not have an understanding of relativity when Vaush pushes him with examples of white people being offended by the presence of black people in a restaurant. To a libertarian this does not compute because he naively thinks that white people cannot legitimately feel oppressed by the mere presence of a black person. Which of course they can and do! Vaush does a brilliant job of breaking this guy down.

@commie I'm done arguing with fools for the day.

This is not a thread about empathy for rape victims. The context of this thread is: "female celebrities getting away with sexual misconduct" The reason this happens is because the standards for female sexual misconduct are very different -- and SHOULD be very different -- than the standards for male sexual misconduct. Because the male can be much more forceful about it. It baffles me that you guys are having a hard time understanding this. It would help if you set your woke-scolding aside for a moment and try to understand why I communicated what I did.

@commie Wake up. Rape is asymmetrical by a factor of 1000x.

Most men get raped by other men. I was not minimizing male on male rape. I was minimizing females raping males. Which is such a silly and rare thing that it isn't worth talking about in the context of males raping females. I'm not saying it cannot ever happen. I'm saying it's absurd to act as though men face anywhere near the same threat from females as females face from males. This is a difference by a factor of at least 100x if not 1000x. So spare me your SJW woke scolding and outrage. The average male faces zero threat ever of getting physically restrained and raped by a female. I have never in my life worried that a woman would rape me. Like zero chance of that. I worry more about getting hit by lightning. Yet if I was a woman I would have those worries frequently throughout my life. Which is why women hitting on men is not such a big deal.

You misunderstand what equal means. You are taking it too literally which leads to absurdities like: "That means a man should be able to talk into a woman's dressing room" or "A woman should be allowed to walk around on the sidewalk topless." Equality means fair treatment while respecting gender differences.

Cry me a river.

Your gaslighting is cute. FoxNews and Breitbart is white nationalist propaganda. Trump has white nationalists working in his admin right now. You're just ignorant of these things. This is not an exaggeration or a strawman. It just is what it is. You're just in denial about it.

Lol If a man lets a 67 year old obese woman rape him, that's his fault.

@electroBeam

Cougar on the prowl. The difference is, she can't rape that guy. Although given how heavy she's going at him in that video, I do wonder... See, if a guy gets raped by a woman, he will most likely enjoy it. Not so the other way around.