Leo Gura

He is being extradited to UK.

Also known as a Tate.

Conor McGregor vs Kangaroo, UFC #748 on White House lawn, when? Joe Rogan: "OMG! That kangaroo just ended Conor McGregor's career with a flying kick!!! It's all over folks. Conor McGregor is dead!"

Not even close. You guys have such absurd views of me. If I was psychotic, you can't even imagine how bad I would be. A psychedelic trip is not psychosis. It can be, but usually it isn't. But also, I am not against psychosis per se. Watch out for demonizing psychosis. It's best not to even talk about psychosis if you are going to be that sloppy about it. Calling people you disagree with psychotic is the laziest trick there is. Just because I say something you dislike doesn't make me psychotic. It just means I have a different point of view. Can psychedelics make you unhinged? Sure. Especially if you do them every day for weeks and months.

Spiritual people tend to have lower sex drives. Otherwise they'd be out screwing all day.

No attack. Just truth.

Dudes, I don't even follow soccer. I have no idea what the ranking are, who the players are, none of that.

I can't read every post on this forum. And even if I could, I can't force everyone to agree with my view.

You got the wrong girl. Natasha eats kangaroos.

But I put Spain first in the list. Accident? I think not.

That's what happens when you try to jump into the fight like a kangaroo but you ain't a kangaroo.

If only Conor McGregor could kick like a kangaroo.

That is how tech bros see you.

Breaking news: Australia only to allow datacenters if they are run by kangaroos.

Apple and Meta both did research that show LLMs are not actually intelligent: The top researchers know that LLMs are not AGI. My point here is a technical one. LLMs cannot handle tasks they were not trained on. LLMs interpolate existing data. They do not generate novel skills or creativity. LLM cannot code in a language not in its training data. A human can. LLM cannot do basic math. Human child can. As long as AI requires so much data, it is cheating, not true intelligence.

I don't know how to create it. I just know it cannot be done by scaling the data of an LLM. It requires a new architexture than LLMs use. Probably AGI is possible, but much harder than tech bros assume. It needs to be able to handle novel situations without specialized training data for that situation. It also needs to be able to do math through reasoning, not probablistic guessing (as it does now). You will know it's true AGI when it uses very little data but is still intelligent. Memorizing the whole internet is not real intelligence. I want to see an AI that uses less data than my PC but is still smart.

Absolutely not.

Ho-ho!

Don't know. Did not watch.

I have not taken it in a decade. But I feel it within a day.

Of course they will deny it.

Jubilee has perfected rage-bait. Leo vs 20 atheists.

That sounds within normal.

That the universe and science are hallucinations inside the supernatural Mind of God.

That is BS. Science vehemently denies the things I say. Science is far more arrogant than you portray it. But once I back it into a corner it pleads: "we don't understand the universe." If you don't understand the universe then stop denying what I say.