Is human irrationality self-induced by God ?

[Cosmin Visan]

The point of God is to not be alone. Thefore, he created this dream in which he interacts with other manifestations of itself. But the whole trick is to not remember he is God, otherwise he will wake up and be alone again. Therefore, he must prevent discovering his true nature. As such, is human irrationality a safe mechanism induced by God in himself in order to be kept into this dream ? As such, people will do all sorts of irrational "sciences" like physics, chemistry, biology, and they will believe with all their being in those irrational fairy tales that they develop. And is amazing how widespread it is. Virtually, all humans are irrational. Is so weird. And all the psychological mechanisms set in place when you try to talk to them and tell them the truth. Therefore, this universal irrationality of the human species is highly suspicious. Is it a safe mechanism of God to not wake up ?

Edited January 28 by Cosmin Visan

[Schizophonia]

The human is only rational, the irrational is another illusion, deception.
What is true, however, is that human intelligence is limited (infinitely limited even ) and that there will always be more holistic and therefore more rational perspectives which we will fail to manipulate.

[Lila9]

If I follow the idea that God is infite creation, then if there is a relatively irrational species like humans in the universe, there must be more variations which means that there must be more rational species somewhere else in the universe.

So the reason for our relative irrationality is because God's infinite expression and creativity.

Despite the human inherent irrationality, humans can still improve it. The main obstacle and the problem with humans' irrationality is human lack of awarness to our own irrationality and self deception that we are acting rationally, which is an irrational belief by itself. 

[Osaid]

Probably better not to imagine an imaginary entity which is creating your experience, it really takes away from the experience.

Edited January 31 by Osaid

[DefinitelyNotARobot]

You can't have irrationality without rationality. Both have no substance of their own. They're inferences that you make between different events and actions and people and concepts and so on. So if a plate falls down and breaks, you infer that something must've happened to knock that plate off the counter, but if a friend of you told you that a monkey in a space suit came through a portal and knocked the plate over and fucked right off, you'd probably think that he was crazy. One makes sense within your rational mind (if a plate falls down and breaks, it probably had a reason), while the other is completely irrational based on your assumptions about the world.

The difficulty here is to see, how both judgments are just mental projections and assumptions. If something exists within the confines of our world view, we call it rational. If it's outside of anything that we could fit into our world view, we call it irrational. Consider that reality doesn't have to confine itself to fit into your rational comprehension, but also consider that this doesn't make it irrational either! Reality is capable of appearing as both rational and irrational, but is also capable of transcending this duality entirely. In this case we'd be talking about a non-linear, multidimensional sort of transrationality, which can entertain multiple states and perspectives at once, while needing neither to be true by themselves.

This transrationality can't be given to you through any rational explanations. Rather, you have to break through the confines of your own rationality and see what's beyond it for yourself.

Edited January 31 by DefinitelyNotARobot