Anton Rogachevski

A Meta-Philosophical view of the epistemic process of understanding

Started by Anton Rogachevski,

22 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

8 hours ago, Anton Rogachevski said:

You seem to have erased the "unknown", everything is known? Nothing is hidden? (I would say that it appears so from a phenomenological perspective)

Knowing is a concept, its part of the ideas circle.

Ideas are objects and knowing is how many object you collect.

Image a room full of objects, each one is an abstract "idea".

Math is mapping physics, but that map is knowledge and it exists only in the ideas layer

Edited by integral

How is this post just me acting out my ego in the usual ways? Is this post just me venting and justifying my selfishness? Are the things you are posting in alignment with principles of higher consciousness and higher stages of ego development? Are you acting in a mature or immature way? Are you being selfish or selfless in your communication? Are you acting like a monkey or like a God-like being?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

14 minutes ago, integral said:

Knowing is a concept

How do you know this?
Can anything be known? So talking about knowing\not knowing is useless? Why do epistemology?

I think Leo would claim that consciousness can know itself fully.

Edited by Anton Rogachevski

https://antonsjournal.home.blog

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Go To Topic Listing Intellectual Stuff: Philosophy, Science, Technology