Ramana Maharshi’s Secret

[Mellowmarsh]

 

[kavaris]

14 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

 

i like this guy, but i dont even know why. i just see his pic all the time And then i say "thats the guy". But i had a friend who use to show me someone like this years prior, but i dont actually remember who it was, or what the practice was called, etc.

I might have to text him to ask if i still have his #

Edited yesterday at 05:58 AM by kavaris

[Mellowmarsh]

13 minutes ago, kavaris said:

like this guy,

This guy is not a guy. 
 

Liking is not liking. 

[kavaris]

42 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

This guy is not a guy. 
 

Liking is not liking. 

Thats why i cant remember then, dagnbitsht!

[Mellowmarsh]

1 hour ago, kavaris said:

Thats why i cant remember then, dagnbitsht!

You can remember. Because you cannot forget. 

[Breakingthewall]

What is "where"? What is "space"? Don't say any simplicity like "you are imagining the space", think really about it .

For example, according the last physics, space is what is created by the multiple chains of cause effect. If there are many chains of cause effect time and space appears, then space would be the separation between those chains

[Mellowmarsh]

11 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

What is "where"? What is "space"? Don't say any simplicity like "you are imagining the space", think really about it .

For example, according the last physics, space is what is created by the multiple chains of cause effect. If there are many chains of cause effect time and space appears, then space would be the separation between those chains

Bit difficult to separate a cloud from the sky. 

[Mellowmarsh]

13 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

separation

Like the separation between the thinker and the thought.

 

Where’s the dividing line? Where is beyond the horizon? 

[Breakingthewall]

7 hours ago, Mellowmarsh said:

Like the separation between the thinker and the thought.

 

Where’s the dividing line? Where is beyond the horizon? 

The thinker is created by duality that implies this structure of reality that we are living now. But the thought and the thinker are just an structure, a reflection of the reality in itself. If that structure is dissolved for a moment, only the reality remains. Then the structure comes back but always it's very clear that the perceptor and the perception are one: what is. 

[Mellowmarsh]

11 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

the perceptor and the perception are one: what is. 

What is is ?

Where is is? 

[kavaris]

What or where is  "to be / stay"   v.  "to be / act"?  Fuirach v. gnìome?

[Mellowmarsh]

34 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

What is is ?

Where is is? 

What?

 

That is the one question to all our answers. 
 

 

[Mellowmarsh]

Answer with knowledge.

 

That can only point to the illusory nature of reality. 
 

Living in the present has no knowledge of present, for one very good reason.

[Mellowmarsh]

15 minutes ago, kavaris said:

v.  "to be / act"?  Fuirach

To act for no audience, can be pointless, might as well just leave the stage if nothing is real. Unless the act is believed to be real along with the believable audience watching the performance.

[Mellowmarsh]

If God wasn’t convinced of the delusion of acting for no audience and the characters were all illusory puppets, then this acting wouldn’t have been possible. It had to be convincing or God wouldn’t bother to play it. 
 

That’s why the illusion had to be very real and convincing, which it is, that’s why no one can awaken from the illusion because there’s no experience other than the illusion, there’s no way to experience the none existence of illusion.

Edited 2 hours ago by Mellowmarsh

[kavaris]

After some amount of loops around, then its only natural to try to interpret using a non-judgemental sortve explacation - but then you have an issue, if its always being braid in a world you cannot touch or sense or see, like some unforgiving dream world, so thats the artistic challenge, to make it like, a trick dream that you dream into, without it erasing whats already there.

Like, to dream, is to trick, where reality is then like a treat, cause then its like, how do i get out of this trick? On the other hand, menú, its like its you who is stuck in that one world view / You who is meant to choose, Like its a relief from a belief to ensue.

Edited 1 hour ago by kavaris

[Breakingthewall]

1 hour ago, Mellowmarsh said:

What is is ?

Where is is? 

Where and what are possibilities of being. Being is previous condition, definitions happens in being, not defining being. Definitions are. 

[Mellowmarsh]

1 minute ago, Breakingthewall said:

Where and what are possibilities of being. Being is previous condition, definitions happens in being, not defining being. Definitions are. 

But this is just knowledge. It’s a fiction. 

[Breakingthewall]

19 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

But this is just knowledge. It’s a fiction. 

Knowledge is a structured description of reality, it's not a fiction. Could be wrong or right, I know that those non dual teachers are against thought, but that's because they can't think properly, it's not so easy. 

[Mellowmarsh]

17 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Knowledge is a structured description of reality, it's not a fiction. Could be wrong or right, I know that those non dual teachers are against thought, but that's because they can't think properly, it's not so easy. 

It’s a fiction, you only believe to be real. Show a ten ton brick of gold to a dog and watch its reaction, it doesn’t say wow that’s going to buy me some super luxurious life. It hasn’t got a clue what gold or money is. The dog just lives in the present unknowable.