Ramana Maharshi’s Secret

[Mellowmarsh]

 

[kavaris]

14 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

 

i like this guy, but i dont even know why. i just see his pic all the time And then i say "thats the guy". But i had a friend who use to show me someone like this years prior, but i dont actually remember who it was, or what the practice was called, etc.

I might have to text him to ask if i still have his #

Edited yesterday at 05:58 AM by kavaris

[Mellowmarsh]

13 minutes ago, kavaris said:

like this guy,

This guy is not a guy. 
 

Liking is not liking. 

[kavaris]

42 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

This guy is not a guy. 
 

Liking is not liking. 

Thats why i cant remember then, dagnbitsht!

[Mellowmarsh]

1 hour ago, kavaris said:

Thats why i cant remember then, dagnbitsht!

You can remember. Because you cannot forget. 

[Breakingthewall]

What is "where"? What is "space"? Don't say any simplicity like "you are imagining the space", think really about it .

For example, according the last physics, space is what is created by the multiple chains of cause effect. If there are many chains of cause effect time and space appears, then space would be the separation between those chains

[Mellowmarsh]

11 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

What is "where"? What is "space"? Don't say any simplicity like "you are imagining the space", think really about it .

For example, according the last physics, space is what is created by the multiple chains of cause effect. If there are many chains of cause effect time and space appears, then space would be the separation between those chains

Bit difficult to separate a cloud from the sky. 

[Mellowmarsh]

13 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

separation

Like the separation between the thinker and the thought.

 

Where’s the dividing line? Where is beyond the horizon? 

[Breakingthewall]

7 hours ago, Mellowmarsh said:

Like the separation between the thinker and the thought.

 

Where’s the dividing line? Where is beyond the horizon? 

The thinker is created by duality that implies this structure of reality that we are living now. But the thought and the thinker are just an structure, a reflection of the reality in itself. If that structure is dissolved for a moment, only the reality remains. Then the structure comes back but always it's very clear that the perceptor and the perception are one: what is. 

[Mellowmarsh]

11 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

the perceptor and the perception are one: what is. 

What is is ?

Where is is? 

[kavaris]

What or where is  "to be / stay"   v.  "to be / act"?  Fuirach v. gnìome?

[Mellowmarsh]

34 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

What is is ?

Where is is? 

What?

 

That is the one question to all our answers. 
 

 

[Mellowmarsh]

Answer with knowledge.

 

That can only point to the illusory nature of reality. 
 

Living in the present has no knowledge of present, for one very good reason.

[Mellowmarsh]

15 minutes ago, kavaris said:

v.  "to be / act"?  Fuirach

To act for no audience, can be pointless, might as well just leave the stage if nothing is real. Unless the act is believed to be real along with the believable audience watching the performance.