Alexop

Challenging Leo on women

321 posts in this topic

8 hours ago, LordFall said:

Even as a man, I avoid associating with low-value males. It’s not out of malice—it’s practical. They rarely possess the agency or competence to help you move toward ambitious goals, and more importantly, they carry an unhealed psyche that inevitably rears its head in all kinds of erratic, unpredictable ways (as @AION and I were touching on earlier).

Lol "low-value males"

Partnering with the people we prefer is already what everyone does.

What is weird and neurotic is feeling the need to adopt a perspective that involves characterizing people negatively; focus on the people first, then qualify them.

No one speaks like that in real life, and what lies behind it is a lack of sovereignty run through the projection machine.

The more you replace "I like" or "I don't like" with generalizing language elements, that purports to be "objective", "ethical," the more you find yourself in a neurotic position. And this is problematic because in such a position you unconsciously are no longer pursuing your own happiness but rather the flourishing of the symbolic order that instilled this superego in you.

8 hours ago, LordFall said:

Women have to be even more selective since they're gonna entangle their lives with these men and have kids with them. A man doesn't need to be a dangerous criminal to still have a majorly negative impact on a woman's life. 

Yes maybe but I was saying that the metaphor she constructed to serve her agenda didn't work.

Because she cheated by lumping together under the term "predator" someone who wants to reproduce with you, which fosters your reproduction and the propagation of your genes, and someone who wants to kill and eat you which does the opposite; to lead you to this second conclusion.

She also suggested that being inconspicuous or dull-colored in the water is the same thing as being unattractive. The two concepts are not linked; in fact if dull-colored fish are favored natural selection will also naturally select for fish that prefer dull-colored mates (since their offspring are more likely to be dull-colored and thus reproduce themselves). Consequently being "dull-colored" becomes the standard of attractiveness even if for some reasonit appears to be the opposite to her human eye.

Nevermind.


Take a bit of Monster

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now