Ajata Project

[VeganAwake]

No Abiding Reality | The Ajata Project https://share.google/lPzt0g8rrQA0SdB2r

 

[Mellowmarsh]

4 hours ago, VeganAwake said:

No Abiding Reality | The Ajata Project https://share.google/lPzt0g8rrQA0SdB2r

 

👆

The epitome of perfect peace.
Seems, No one wants to abide here.

[Breakingthewall]

12 hours ago, VeganAwake said:

No Abiding Reality | The Ajata Project https://share.google/lPzt0g8rrQA0SdB2r

 

 

They say this:

Therefore, when a tree, for instance, is analyzed, the tree is not found, but its mode of being or emptiness is found. Then, when that emptiness is analyzed, that emptiness also is not found, but the emptiness of that emptiness is found. This is called an emptiness of emptiness. Thus, a tree is a conventional ‘truth’, and its mode of being is an ultimate truth…

 

How they analyze the tree ? Maybe they know all the physical procceses that happens in the reality that have as a consequence the tree? Or maybe they see a tree and they arrived to the conclusion that it's empty, just by feeling?

Seems that they are inventing a paradigm without a real deep understanding of what a tree is. Like, I see the tree, then I arrive to the conclusion that the tree is the void. Well, if you say so.....

All this text is a conceptual paradigm built over some "truths" that are just subjetive ideas of the philosopher who wrote it, that can't be seriously confronted because they depends of logical jumps that make no real sense but they present as absolute logical obviousness 

 

Edited 8 hours ago by Breakingthewall

[Breakingthewall]

Or this:

 

Though phenomena appear as if true, most true, ultimately they are not true. Therefore phenomena abide in the middle way, not truly or inherently existent and also not utterly non-existent…

 

So, according to him the phenomena appears as true, but they aren't. What means "true"? Why they appear as true and they aren't? 

That's just a subjetive categorization that the writer established just because that's his feeling. Like if "true" was something that everyone have exactly determined. That's a kind of reasoning that can't be seriously confronted. If you want to believe this you have to be extremely permissive with all the logical jumps. 

[Breakingthewall]

8 hours ago, Mellowmarsh said:

👆

The epitome of perfect peace.
Seems, No one wants to abide here.

Why it's peace having that mental paradigm? Imo what's peace is perceiving directly without mental filter, without categories like void, meaning, karma or anything. Just being open to the real flow now. Definitions happen in the flow, can't encompass it. Void is just an idea that want to express "without reality" when you are talking about the reality. The reality can't be unreal because it's the reality. You can't define it, you are it. Knowing in this case is being, not defining.

Edited 8 hours ago by Breakingthewall