Detachment and Playfulness is a natural consequence of becoming more conscious

[Breakingthewall]

10 hours ago, Eskilon said:

Right now I can't, but who knows later haha. I honestly don't know what is possible and impossible. I'm open.

You never could. The only problem with that philosophy of enlightenment that claims that you are the field of consciousness where the thoughts arise is that is false. It sounds good and have great acceptation between spiritual people, as we listen in that relate in the video, but it's just falsehood. Its a kind of narcissism that locates the self in a position of control while they call it no self. 

Anyway imo ayu khandro didn't claim that reality is consciousness but rigpa, that could be interpreted as unlimited. She was conscious of the unlimited nature or reality, not that reality is consciousness, but their explanations are vague 

Edited yesterday at 10:08 AM by Breakingthewall

[Eskilon]

13 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

Its a kind of narcissism that locates the self in a position of control while they call it no self. 

Self and no self can be the same thing expressed in different ways.

 

13 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

Anyway imo ayu khandro didn't claim that reality is consciousness but rigpa, that could be interpreted as unlimited. She was conscious of the unlimited nature or reality, not that reality is consciousness, but their explanations are vague 

Reality must be consciousness because you are conscious right now. Whatever you mean by unlimited must be consciousness. A field where every experience can be housed seems like a good pointer.

[Breakingthewall]

14 hours ago, Eskilon said:

Reality must be consciousness because you are conscious right now.

Reality is conscious because I'm conscious right now. It's different. Consciousness is the reality being aware of itself, not the reality itself. 

[Eskilon]

4 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

Reality is conscious because I'm conscious right now. It's different. Consciousness is the reality being aware of itself, not the reality itself. 

The Object can't be different from the Subject. Nor can an object exist without a Subject. Reality must be awareness(whatever that is) by the simple fact of your experience right now.

 

Edited 3 hours ago by Eskilon

[Breakingthewall]

1 hour ago, Eskilon said:

The Object can't be different from the Subject. Nor can an object exist without a Subject. Reality must be awareness(whatever that is) by the simple fact of your experience right now.

 

19 hours ago, Eskilon said:

 

So in your opinion you are creating your experience, that is not real? Like solipsism?

[Eskilon]

13 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

So in your opinion you are creating your experience, that is not real? Like solipsism?

I don't know, it's more like a luminous emptiness. I cannot point where I am, but there's awareness. This awareness seems to be the space where everything is, before attention or objects.