Frame of Existence

[No1Here2c]

Self & world as we know it is an image contained within a frame. Self is but one aspect of the image which is a partition of the entire world. No matter where self looks to within the image, it remains a part of the image.

What is the image?

What is the subtance of the image?

What contains the image?

What is the picture frame?

What is the substance of the frame?

Is the frame of a different nature in substance than that of the image contained within?

How does an aspect of the image capture the frame in which it is situated?

How does understanding, as an aspect of a partitioned piece of the image, come to grasp & understand the frame of which it sits inside?

How, as the lemur within the frame, contained as an aspect of the rest of the world in there, can you reach outside to grasp the frame itself?

Anywhere you turn to look or reach, will necessarily be within the surrounding world, as the creature is stuck looking out from the lense of its own eyes.

Where do we go from here?

[No1Here2c]

The context within the frame can be expanded through various means. Context is held within the eyes of the character, a sort of imagined frame, which does not have distinct defined basis in the image itself, but is rather a filter through which all shape/color must be passed before any content reaches the observer 'inside' of the lemur. All of this is held within the true frame.

The scope of the character's context can be expanded, but the frame always remains. When the character thinks to have broken out of the frame, is actually a breaking out of context that was imaginarily held as the frame itself. Context can never be Truth, it can never be the entire frame. Context itself is as function of the lemur which is an aspect of the scenery held within the true frame.

The frame is Truth. The frame is pure Consciousness.

The true frame is the 'actual container' for all of the activities within it. The world/character, & the actual experience of the characters perception, of which is Illusorily held within the character's imagined/presented context, is all within the true frame of consciousness itself.

'The frame', or consciousness itself, has no distinct qualities to it. It cannot be grasped in the same way as any aspect of the image. It is of a different sort of nature.

The consciousness is the true observer. It is not held within the lemur. But rather the entire wholistic process is grasped by consciousness all at once, and presented as 'the lemurs existence from within its own eyes'

It can almost be thought of as if there is no frame. The black border does not exist, as that too is an artifact of the lemur looking out. Rather everything spills seamlessly into the white void, which has no end, has no limit, or divisive quality, so it cannot be grasped through the traditional means that the lemur understands. Lemur himself only understands division and distinct aspects; Things with quality(color, forms, texture, etc...etc...)

Edited 17 hours ago by No1Here2c

[No1Here2c]

It is not even that the lemur must somehow grasp this consciousness, as it is known that the consciousness is what grasps the lemur and its perceptual world. There is nothing really that the lemur 'must do' to have this 'click in its mind', as the doing, and anything which could 'click into place' for it, is already what consciousness will hold within it. It is this intrinsic grasping nature of consciousness that must itself be understood. That regardless of the lemurs understanding, consciousness will be there experiencing it. That is itself the understanding.

At the same time that the lemur need not do anything, the only way for the lemur to have a snowballs chance through hell of getting this is for him to work very hard to understand it. This work goes deeper than words, linguistics, & logic. It requires utilization of imagination, and direct conscious awareness. It requires the ability to navigate conscious state through various means.

This is all only a model, a tool for communication, & a surface level one at that. Words will only ever 'capture' the very surface. Hence the difficulties in communication here. No human model will ever touch the full depth of consciousness. Or effectively convey the scope of Truth

Edited 16 hours ago by No1Here2c

[Someone here]

Duality is imaginary . If you zoom into any dividing line or boundary between two objects you will find infinite fractal . You can zoom forever.

[No1Here2c]

I create theoretical models of reality which do not align with truth. They are a useful communicative tool but they are not ultimate reality. Ultimately it cannot be transcribed, modeled, or brought down into communicable form. Attempts at this are ultimately futile, and a distraction from True conscious awareness in immediate presence. This is what I seek. True conscious awareness in immediate presence.

In immediate presence is where the full understanding is had. Not through words, meanings, language, logic, linguistics, limited imagination, or anything of the like. It is had directly. Here now. Through consciousness. 

Maximum understanding is had directly. Here now. Through consciousness. Do not expect it to serve survival in anyway way.

Edited 2 hours ago by No1Here2c