Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
INFP RACOON BABY

Heavy Metals detox protocol

1 post in this topic

If I take the non-provoked urine test and I test strongly for heavy metals,would it not make more sense to do this and find my results first before taking the provoked test. As Leo suggests in his protocol video to do both an unprovoked and then a provoked test before getting the results, and then sending them off at the same time.

Would it not be a mistake in terms of risk to then take the provoked urine test using dsma when I have already tested to a level where I know I want to do the full protocol? I suppose my point is what are the actual benefits if I do test strongly on the non-provoked urine test?

Is it the case that the unprovoked test provides such unreliable results compared to the provoke test that as a baseline point of reference it is more valuable and worthwhile to perform the provoked test as mandatory.

I am slightly concerned as my data in 23andme shows I have the variant of the MHTFR gene that does not allow for proper methylation, and put me in the bottom 10% of the population.

Edited by INFP RACOON BABY

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0