tvaeli

When to be a racist?

6 posts in this topic

Racism, generally, is reliance of genetic assumption, rather than reality: judging people on genes is not right, but genes have strong expression and determine many things non-racist would reach on observation. It's not the right basis to form a mental class.

I was accused by some spanish because I said I am Viking / Russian: for imagined traits and mythos. While this is definite racism, I made the Spanish racist seem mocked only to me:

  • I just analyzed the "Spanish" traits in this cultural group, and provided them with nationalist statements about their nation.
  • The people, who fight with Viking / Russian based on their tradition, were offended by me saying this or that is spanish trait and this is why I respond like this, telling me it's a racism. This is race-specific discrimination of racism.

Generally, making assumptions on me based on my gene and race, opposing it to their national culture and genetics, will provide me this:

  • I am in conflict with psychological trait of these people, by which they identify by their race or gene.

This is often a correct expression: all these traits they identify as their race-specifics, and by which they protect their race, are their race-specific traits, even if not general for the race. For example, some spanish people told me they are high-class, but could not produce any other basis than this Viking / Russian story: I referred as this as "Spanish people", using correct logic and referential system for task given, so it's mathematically correct (not a category bias), I was able to use the words "Spanish culture" and "Spanish society" and extract it in a way which is not offensive for people who did not use the argument:

  • I am consistently mocking the high-responsibiliy low-IQ class; for example I was telling that stupidity is a crime, a fatal bias which makes you low, and it's the sick lowness of an IQ. I said it to person who was actively measuring my ethics and code motivation, but could not read these papers nor do any math; he managed to closed the project based on "motivation", basically that I did not give them credit for my work and stated that it's the "class against my work", who closes the project: I told this, seeing the eyes which wanted to mess with my project, to tell me they have the right; how sad how low-IQ people in this process of pride destroy their own good: they destroy the project which would help them. It's still a materialist position - creed and smiles are material qualities they express.
  • I consistently tell it's the "Spanish race" or racial syndrome, the one which is measuring me based on their "better race" or "better religion", and I did mock them about their race and religion based on input they gave me about their race and religion, because they were anti-racist, but expressing well enough what they are for me, as race and atheist living with this religion. I expressed this as their "racial qualities", any wrong assumption they made based on this race - they said "all Spanish are not like this", I agreed definitely - but here, it's the mock of low-IQ people, if they express it's a race, you call it their race and make opinions and verifications based on this; they are eager that you measure someone else of their race: but if they are not telling me about my Viking / Russian gene, this is international and liberal people not bound to race.
    • A racist man is definitely protecting their country against yours; by careful wording, you can express them in terms of being that race and doing it based on this: they are not genetically this race and guilty, but they are psychologically this race and you can criticise their psychological race.

Because I do not like Reddit, I posted it there: low-IQ people did not understand the logic, but made the racial mistake - they generalized my post based on patterns of words, but they did not understand if Spanish people were doing something against me with statement of being Spanish, gaining more of this - definitely, my ironic mock is the argument that they are Spanish and this was why they were doing that, and the case that they are very ethical and cannot tolerate this kind of insults generally for Spanish people - is the typical low-IQ scenario where you can find out expressions about their "humanistic behaviours" are actually insults, not connected to their racial memory at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Racism has absolutely nothing to do with genetics. But it is all to do with identity. And, identity is purely an artificial construction, whether consciously done or not.


This is signature is intentionally blank.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@LastThursday Identity is existence for neurotypicals. It is not artitificial. It is "real" in the most fundamental sense of the word; but only for neurotypicals.

My latest hypothesis is that identity and social norms are only empty and "artificial" for people with ADHD.

ADHD was never about attention. People with ADHD only struggle to focus if the act of focussing stems from sociatal expectation. They never where "hyperactive" they just don't see and accept the social rule that demands them to sit still.

Edited by Cred

There is no existence outside the subject, the object and the symbol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@LastThursday If I remember correctly, you are the one who said you don't like it when users on this forum make up their own concepts expecting people to understand?

If you are interested in my theory, I have good news for you which is: I just managed to radically debloat my theory. It seems to be down to just 3 principles again (plus spaciousness) from 8.

You are right that the theory is bad if I can't explain it in ordinary language. However I will not make promises about never making up words again. I think this can be a powerful tool for increasing understanding, symbolism, compactness and the probability of finding an ideal language.

Edited by Cred

There is no existence outside the subject, the object and the symbol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, LastThursday said:

Racism has absolutely nothing to do with genetics. But it is all to do with identity. And, identity is purely an artificial construction, whether consciously done or not.

Yup. "Race" doesn't exist. It is a social construct with a certain degree of reality to it relative to how much people buy into it, similar to how money works. The tendency of race to overlap with demographics and ethnocentrism makes it feel more real however.

Americans are obsessed with race. It's shapes their entire thinking, how they relate to different people and talk about themselves with each other. For no other country is race a more hut button topic. Undermining race as a concept can feel like undermining slavery and marginalization, though both are true in my opinion.

The concept of race has a definite traceable history, going back to the 16th century. America bought into race a lot early in its history, which makes it harder for them to transcend the concept since there is a lot of trauma linked to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Race is just a construct to support western hegemony. Italians used to not be considered white for example.


There is no existence outside the subject, the object and the symbol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now