Neurodivergent people (we) can and should rule the world (I’m 100% serious)

[Cred]

5 minutes ago, Cred said:

In fact, the peasant thinks the chickens are cute as hell runnin around all unaware of shit. 

Also, I have to add that seeing NTs as "cute" rather than "inferior" or 

13 hours ago, PenguinPablo said:

stupid as hell, group-thinking herd animals that fall for every human bias in the book with ease and without questioning themselves

is a process that is not trivial at all to reach. It requires you to deconstruct every way they have been discriminating you for being an ND truth/passion loving person and forgive them. This requires you to learn about neurodiversity, there is no other way. Currently, Actualized.org does not help you achieve that. My goal is to change this and is why I'm campaigning hard for ND the last view days.

[Shermaningeorgia]

4 hours ago, Cred said:

Depends on what you mean by "them"

If you mean neurotypicals i'd answer: We don't control/manipulate them because we hate them. Does a peasant put fences around their chickens bc they hate them? No, he does this so they don't get eaten by foxes. In fact, the peasant thinks the chickens are cute as hell runnin around all unaware of shit. 

Neurotypicals discriminate against us not because they are evil, but because they don't know any better. Also neurotypicals don't hate the people who manipulate them because they need and want to be manipulated, it is a win-win situation.

If you mean "bourgeoisie" I'd say ABSOLUTELY. The problem with the class struggle isn't that the working-class hates the bourgeoisie too much, it's that the workingclass doesn't hate the bourgeousie ENOUGH. The bourgeoisie class will always hate communism and the working class as long as the bourgeoisie exists (this is why the canadian prime minister had to bash communism and the communist working class for no reason in his speech). In order to really create a world without hate, we need to stop meditating so much and move towards a classless society 

It is important for me to add that I don't expect you to hate the rich. If you are a truth loving person (on the spectrum between autism and HSP) which you are, then you understand that the bourgeoisie and the working class act in their own egoic interests and are not inherently evil. The best way you can support the revolution anyway is by level-headedly educating the working class about the class struggle and make them super-duper angry.

I'm not bothered really. your points are cringe and weird. that's all. I'm entitled to my opinions.

[Madyar]

US has formally most robust and influential government structure if you get rid of it you end up with aimless and cruel wannabe systems around the world which have no practical method to lead vital issues you think EU is doing good ? nope even socialist, social democratic borders are highly corrupted and inefficient and i am not even living in the us this is me typing from iran in the middle of massacre! 

[Cred]

2 hours ago, Shermaningeorgia said:

I'm not bothered really. your points are cringe and weird. that's all. I'm entitled to my opinions.

My points are a fun spin on a very well researched and practiced historical and theoretical framework. If you don't want to learn about it that's okay. Thanks for participating in the discussion!😊

[Cred]

@Madyar Hi, I hope you're doing okay!

I am not disagreeing with you about corruption in social democracies and that they wouldn't qualitatively act different if they were in charge. Why do you think I do? Bc I'm from germany?

I'm not a fan of the EU. They are not socialist at all. They are social chauvinists at best. Big difference. But still, they would do a better job than america. China would do best but they respect sovereignty so...

Why exactly is "robust and influential" something good? And why do you even assume that anyone should be in charge of any global issues? Why don't just let countries actually have their sovereignty?

Edited 3 hours ago by Cred

[Madyar]

1 hour ago, Cred said:

@Madyar Hi, I hope you're doing okay!

I am not disagreeing with you about corruption in social democracies and that they wouldn't qualitatively act different if they were in charge. Why do you think I do? Bc I'm from germany?

I'm not a fan of the EU. They are not socialist at all. They are social chauvinists at best. Big difference. But still, they would do a better job than america. China would do best but they respect sovereignty so...

Why exactly is "robust and influential" something good? And why do you even assume that anyone should be in charge of any global issues? Why don't just let countries actually have their sovereignty?

thank you my friend <3 no i absolutely love germany so many brilliant minds out there, well as much as so called primitive sovereignty might conceptually imply something fragmented but in reality all those fragments unite into one monolith form at some point. so greater sovereignties end up more inclusive, balanced, relevant to more sets rather than one specific.. the issue is if one gets shattered the experience will be lost so the other one needs to compensate those defects. so as we speaking i see EU is lacking a lot of stimulus and determined acts maybe even for a long time now! so US is compensating those flaws as you can see the case iran for instance the whole EU decided to stay silent against genocide more than 30k death in one week!!! see that is due to rooted fear of radicalism and indolence which has penetrated within. when you know what is the right thing to do but the software and system prevents you doing it. when life loses the flare stagnancy comes after.