Raze

Groyper MAGA civil war analysis

25 posts in this topic

They need to put Fuentes on Jubilee. He'd become a liberal. Like how it broke Peterson.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lately Fuentes has been ranting about Tucker Carlson.

This is the one reason why I think he will fail to take over the party, unlike Trump who is quick to forgive, Fuentes only knows how to make enemies. Tucker rocketed his success yet Fuentes continues to bash him for making extremely minor criticisms. 

He’s also doubling down on attacking Candace Owens and MTG despite them having the biggest platforms in the country that are aligned closest with his beliefs. 

Edited by Raze

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure this cleanly fits the groyper divide but interesting debate on the wider MAGA divide:

Could say there’s three factions

- libertarian non-interventionist MAGA who are anti-imperial by principle (Dave Smith)

- neocon nationalist / interventionist MAGA who white wash imperialism under the banner of patriotic self-interest (D’Souza)

- ethno-religous nationalist who only want intervention to serve their identified in-group or create a fortress around Western “civilization” ie Monroe doctrine. They also want internalised imperialism to enforce their version of America.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now