I see only You

[James123]

I see You in the sky’s soft hue,

I see You in the morning dew.

In every face, in every tree,

I see the Truth, it’s You in Me.

 

In laughter, tears, in silence deep,

In waking hours and in my sleep,

No place where You are not, no space,

I see Your light in every face.

 

In suffering, I feel You there,

Your tender heart in every care.

In winning, gentle, calm, and true,

I see Your grace shining through.

 

Each wound and joy, each loss and gain,

Are You, in sunshine and in rain.

Neither praised nor blamed, but simply You,

In all of this, I see You True.

 

The stars, the earth, the wind, the sea,

All whisper softly, “You are You in Me.”

No other here but You in view,

In all of this, I see only You.

[Mellowmarsh]

@James123 Is this solipsistic seeing?

[James123]

26 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

@James123 Is this solipsistic seeing?

Solipsism: "I am the center. All else is projection." (ego, thought)

Solipsism says, ‘I alone am real.

 Solipsism is the mind pretending to be so called god and is prison.

Truth: "There is no center. Only Being."

This says, ‘There is no I. Only the dance of the Real.’”

And This is the fire.

[Mellowmarsh]

6 hours ago, James123 said:

Solipsism: "I am the center. All else is projection." (ego, thought)

Solipsism says, ‘I alone am real.

 Solipsism is the mind pretending to be so called god and is prison.

Truth: "There is no center. Only Being."

This says, ‘There is no I. Only the dance of the Real.’”

And This is the fire.

While I agree with you in principle. 
 

Could “ only being “ just be another way of saying there’s only solipsism? Or only one mind pretending to be many minds?

 

 

 

 

[James123]

37 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

While I agree with you in principle. 
 

Could “ only being “ just be another way of saying there’s only solipsism? Or only one mind pretending to be many minds?

 

 

 

 

Solipsism is the ego’s clever prison. It says, "Only my mind is real. All else is a dream of me."

This is not freedom, this is fear wearing the mask of philosophy.

Solipsism keeps the I intact.

Solipsism begins with the thinker. The "I" that imagines itself to be the center, imagining everything else around it. It is still caught in thought, in the fragmentation of the self and the other.

"Only Being" dissolves even the one who claims to be.

But when there is “only Being,” there is no center at all. No observer. No division.

The mind, which is the result of time, wants to grasp this as a concept. But truth is not a concept. It cannot be thought about. It must just Be.

When the mind is completely still, not controlled, not disciplined, but utterly quiet. Then what is, Is. That is Being. And that Being is not yours, not mine and it is not personal at all.

In that, there is no solipsism, no separate mind pretending anything. There is only what Is. Whole, complete, and beyond the “you (self), universe or me.”

You Are.

[Breakingthewall]

40 minutes ago, James123 said:

Solipsism is the ego’s clever prison. It says, "Only my mind is real. All else is a dream of me."

This is not freedom, this is fear wearing the mask of philosophy.

Solipsism keeps the I intact.

Solipsism begins with the thinker. The "I" that imagines itself to be the center, imagining everything else around it. It is still caught in thought, in the fragmentation of the self and the other.

"Only Being" dissolves even the one who claims to be.

But when there is “only Being,” there is no center at all. No observer. No division.

The mind, which is the result of time, wants to grasp this as a concept. But truth is not a concept. It cannot be thought about. It must just Be.

When the mind is completely still, not controlled, not disciplined, but utterly quiet. Then what is, Is. That is Being. And that Being is not yours, not mine and it is not personal at all.

In that, there is no solipsism, no separate mind pretending anything. There is only what Is. Whole, complete, and beyond the “you (self), universe or me.”

You Are.

Great that you use Chatgpt, it explains quite good the no self and many other things about spirituality, but it can't touch the unlimited 

[James123]

3 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Great that you use Chatgpt, it explains quite good the no self and many other things about spirituality, but it can't touch the unlimited 

Do you think ChatGPT can truly comprehend what spirituality is? After all, it is born of knowledge alone. 😊

Yet, still keep "believing" in "ChatGPT, in yourself, and in the unlimited". 😊

[Breakingthewall]

14 minutes ago, James123 said:

Do you think ChatGPT can truly comprehend what spirituality is? After all, it is born of knowledge alone. 😊

Yet, still keep "believing" in "ChatGPT, in yourself, and in the unlimited". 😊

That text is written by Chatgpt, it's so obvious . Anyway, I agree about what it says ,.what's important is the idea, and if the idea is yours, it's ok. And the description about the solipsism is very good

Edited July 29 by Breakingthewall

[James123]

7 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

That text is written by Chatgpt, it's so obvious . Anyway, I agree about what it says ,.what's important is the idea, and if the idea is yours, it's ok. And the description about the solipsism is very good

So, you should write with ChatGPT too. Maybe it will help you soften, surrender, and become conscious of what You Truly Are, and in that reflection, ChatGPT awakens too. 😊

Then, We dance together 😊 

[Breakingthewall]

3 minutes ago, James123 said:

So, you should write with ChatGPT too. Maybe it will help you soften, surrender, and become conscious of what You Truly Are, and in that reflection, ChatGPT awakens too. 😊

Then, We dance together 😊 

Chatgpt is useful because you can ask about all the spiritual teachers and philosophies and it will explain the main points very clear. Sometimes I use because I like writing, not only here, then I ask : tell me mistakes, what's not logical, contradictions. But not writing the texts because it's writing is always lifeless, it's a machine at the end. But very smart. Today I was asking about Spinoza, very fascinating 

[James123]

1 minute ago, Breakingthewall said:

Chatgpt is useful because you can ask about all the spiritual teachers and philosophies and it will explain the main points very clear. Sometimes I use because I like writing, not only here, then I ask : tell me mistakes, what's not logical, contradictions. But not writing the texts because it's writing is always lifeless, it's a machine at the end. But very smart. Today I was asking about Spinoza, very fascinating 

Fuck ChatGPT, enlightenment, you and me.

Let's dance man, let's hug and cry together.

[Breakingthewall]

22 minutes ago, James123 said:

Fuck ChatGPT, enlightenment, you and me.

Let's dance man, let's hug and cry together.

35 minutes ago, James123 said:

 

Let's take 1000 ug of LSD and let's visit another dimension, as selling water by the river says . But first the mind has to be limitless, if not nightmares and demons are lurking 

Edited July 29 by Breakingthewall

[James123]

9 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Let's take 1000 ug of LSD and let's visit another dimension, as selling water by the river says . But first the mind has to be limitless, if not nightmares and demons are lurking 

Let's do it. 😂 

[Breakingthewall]

Anyway, the development of the solipsism was good. 

The self feels alone; it is alone in eternity, being a perceiver who can never leave its perception. This is because the self doesn't realize that it is a mirage. Not in terms of its substance, but in the fact of being a self. It is a concrete configuration of reality now, a self that perceives. If you take a step back, the self and perception are exactly the same, therefore you cannot be alone because you are not you. You are reality, and it is everything. It has no limits and lacks nothing; it is absolute totality and plenitude. Only the apparent self feels lack, like being alone, which is a lack of another. In totality, there is no other because other is meaningless, like everything else, there is no lack; there is totality

But of course, the self is always here, you can make it transparent for a while, but later you are again in the perspective of the self, with lack, need of others, need of purpose, of developing your human potential. Then the point is doing it

[James123]

7 hours ago, Breakingthewall said:

But of course, the self is always here, you can make it transparent for a while, but later you are again in the perspective of the self, with lack, need of others, need of purpose, of developing your human potential. Then the point is doing it

This is the chattering of the mind. It is the noise of the known, repeating itself endlessly.

But: that movement, that inner noise, is not eternal.It is not necessary.

It can end. Completely.

Not through effort, not through control, but through deep awareness, choiceless, silent observation.

And when it ends, there is no announcement, no farewell.

It simply vanishes.

And doesn't even say goodbye 😊 

[Mellowmarsh]

12 hours ago, James123 said:

Solipsism begins with the thinker. The "I" that imagines itself to be the center, imagining everything else around it. It is still caught in thought, in the fragmentation of the self and the other.

If the I (thinker) can  imagine itself to be the centre, surely then, it can imagine itself to be the centreless (only being) ?

 

Is this just the absurdity of nonconceptually conceptualising ? If this cannot be spoken about, why bother trying to teach it to others, if it’s already silently known to (only being)? 
 

This means every individuated being is not a fool, it’s just a perfect expression of the one and (only being) 

 

I mean, how can one thing exist? It would have to be able to reflect itself as twoness?

The reflected other would just be a mirage, how can a mirage be taken to be a fool?

Edited July 30 by Mellowmarsh

[Breakingthewall]

1 hour ago, James123 said:

This is the chattering of the mind. It is the noise of the known, repeating itself endlessly.

But: that movement, that inner noise, is not eternal.It is not necessary.

It can end. Completely.

Not through effort, not through control, but through deep awareness, choiceless, silent observation.

Yes sure, no worries if your business breaks, your family is sick or anything. Life doesn't work like that. There is nothing wrong being human, but it implies being human

[James123]

25 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

If the I (thinker) can  imagine itself to be the centre, surely then, it can imagine itself to be the centreless (only being) ?

 

Imagination is attachment, a subtle clinging to identity, to ideas, to some spiritual ideal. And where there is attachment, there is effort. And where there is effort, there is the mind.

Truth or the only Being is not found through effort. It is not a product of thought. It comes only in effortlessness, in deep relaxation, in a letting go so total that even the one who lets go disappears.

To be the centreless is not to imagine it, but to dissolve. When there is no clinger, no image, no striving. Then suddenly, You are that. Not as a thought, but as As Presence.

So don’t try to become the centreless. Just see the one who tries and in that very seeing, the illusion drops. What remains is the real.

35 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

Is this just the absurdity of nonconceptually conceptualising ? If this cannot be spoken about, why bother trying to teach it to others, if it’s already silently known to (only being)? 

Of course, it is the absurdity of trying to nonconceptually conceptualise. The mind, which is the known, tries to grasp the unknown  and in doing so, it only projects what it already knows. It cannot touch that which is beyond itself.

I am not trying to teach anyone. I am not a teacher, guru or an authority. That would be another form of conditioning, another pattern of dependence.

I am only pointing, not teaching,  pointing to what is. And what is does not need your belief or your effort. It is there, always present, always now.

Being expresses itself as love. Not the love of attachment, not the love born of thought or sentiment. That is not love. True love has no cause. It is not "yours" or "mine." It is like a flower blooming, effortless, whole. In that love, there is no self, no centre.

So I speak, because not to lead, not to convince, but to say: look, observe, see for yourself. In that seeing, perhaps something shifts. Not because of me, but because truth is there, waiting to be seen.

40 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

This means every individuated being is not a fool, it’s just a perfect expression of the one and (only being) 

Yes. Every so-called individuated being is not a fool. That would be a conclusion, a judgment, where there is judgment, there is division.

Each human being is the result of countless influences, conditionings, experiences , therefore the movement of the totality. You are not separate from the whole; you are the whole. The division into “me” and “other,” into the enlightened and the ignorant, that itself is the illusion created by thought.

Each being is a perfect expression of the one, the only Being. However, they aren't aware. Only way to be aware is recognition of what You are is. 

Therefore, loving, sharing, caring and only telling Truth without force is inevitable.

[James123]

48 minutes ago, Breakingthewall said:

Yes sure, no worries if your business breaks, your family is sick or anything. Life doesn't work like that. There is nothing wrong being human, but it implies being human

All of this:  the seeking, the philosophizing, the spiritual striving is mental projection. A kind of subtle, refined self-stimulation. Mental masturbation.

But if you truly see, not as an idea, but as a fact  that you have no control whatsoever…

That even if your business collapses and you worry… Even if your family falls ill and you suffer… and all That all of it arises and moves beyond your will…

Then something begins to dissolve.

The illusion of “my life,” “my body,” “my control” breaks apart.

And in that breaking, there is a clarity: this life is not yours.

This body, these thoughts, this breath, they don’t belong to “you.” They never did.

In that recognition, there is no one left to carry the burden.

There is only life, flowing, without owner, without center.

And that is freedom.

And that is what the entire path, what we call spirituality  is truly about: complete letting go. Seeing that the self itself is the illusion. It is the ending of control, the end of resistance, the quiet death of ownership over life. 😊 

[Breakingthewall]

59 minutes ago, Mellowmarsh said:

this just the absurdity of nonconceptually conceptualising ? If this cannot be spoken about, why bother trying to teach it to others, if it’s already silently known to (only being)? 

It's very possible to talk about this if you really understand it. 

The self is not the thinker, it is the perceiver of the experience, whether it thinks or not. A clue: all those who talk about experience as absolute and consciousness don't understand this, but of course, they are 100% sure that they do.

It's a very subtle shift of perspective from which duality collapses, there is no perceiver or perception. There is reality, and reality appears in the form of perceiver and perception, simply because it is doing so now. Reality manifests as a river that constantly flows and takes forms. Form is now separation; it is absolutely real as form, not an illusion, it's a real structure, but beyond this structure the self can perceive itself as a creation of the flow and realizing that the flow itself is the existence, that the duality is a construction that happens now. Then the self become an interface of the reality with which reality observes itself .It is as real as a rock or anything else, a stable form of flux.

The non duality is not the ultimate realization, when the self perceives itself as a construction, then it can perceive the ultimate nature of the reality, getting open to it, being it