The Ultimate Relative Conclusion

[Bogdan]

I call it the Christmas Tree of Yes and No. Or the Tree of Paradox.

It's an attempt to explain why explaining non-duality through language is so tricky, and why the ego gets so tripped up in technical metaphysical terms.

So for ANY conclusion that we can reach through language (including this one), the following meta-answer can be applied:

Yes.

No.

Both yes and No.

Neither yes nor no.

Both both yes and no AND neither yes nor no.

Neither both yes and no NOR neither yes nor no.

Both Both both yes and no AND neither yes nor no and Neither both yes and no NOR neither yes nor no.

 

Etc, to infinity

 

It's an attempt to explain why it's not enough to just hear the correct metaphysical pointers, such as:

God is Love

God is Infinity

God is Reality

God is Nothing

God is Everything

Etc

Because spoken through language, there will always be a +1 to be added by the ego. This points to the ego's infinite capacity for BS and mental masturbation.

God is Infinity. "Oh yeah? Well, then x and y are not God, because they are finite"

 

The point i am trying to make is that even the very fact that the ego can deny infinity infinitely, paradoxically leads to infinity.

Infinity is SO obvious, and yet the Christmas Tree of Yes and No applies even to this statement. And to this one, etc 😆

 

Let's have some fun with it, and i challenge you guys to apply the Christmas Tree of Yes and No appropriately:

 

"Infinity is Infinite"

Yes - uhm... Duh!

No - infinity cannot be truly infinite, because by definition it cannot be finite, because then it would not be infinite - YES - within this circular logic, that seems to be correct, because we can force this twisted perspective, and NO - Infinity is paradoxical, because it MUST contain even  impossibilities, things it cannot do and be, cause otherwise it wouldn't be truly infinite - YES - because by definition it also contains "must" AND "mustn't", things jt is forced to be AND NO because  bla bla bla

 

I already feel stupid and dizzy just for trying to engage with this kind of logic.

 

So that's why i find it annoying to keep talking about non-duality, what this teacher said and what that teacher said. (Paradoxically i also love it)

Because the whole fun is for everyone to access infinity more and more, and also find their OWN original language to express and dance AROUND these old timeless truths, instead of mindlessly memorizing more and more wordy explanations from various teachers.

 

So if you come to me with a non-dual CONCLUSION, the Tree of Paradox applies, so INFINITY IS THE ONLY ANSWER, REALLY! And so it's ultimately obvious if your ego is getting tripped up somewhere in the branches of the Tree.

 

(notice how even this can turn into an endless ego BS debate, even this can be used by the ego to pretend like there isn't an infinite Truth)

 

But that's why i insist - there is ONLY Nothing, and Nothing IS Infinity, cause it's the Only ingredient that doesn't need anything to be infinite. You don't need fancy explanations of Creation!

There is only Zero - by definition, there is only One Zero. (Because there is NO difference between one zero, zero zeros, 365 zeros or infinite zeros)

"One" exists, BECAUSE that's what Zero IS - One of "itself" - One of it's Infinite Self.

By the same Logic, that "creates" the illusion of 2 - Zero AND One.

That's WHY 3, 4, 5 ... That's WHY Infinity appears also as infinite finitudes, and that's why Nothing is Everything.

But the Truth is One - Zero. (Infinity)

And perhaps the Tree can help some to see how inescapable and obvious infinity is.

 

Final thought:

Nothing is Infinity, Everything is Infinity, Zero is Infinity, One, Two, Three, all are Infinity!

Nothing... But LOVE! 😆😆😆♥️

[samijiben]

It is neither both the yes-no-either-or conundrum nor anything else but LOVE, indeed. Love holds the winning card.