Carl-Richard

Advanced AI-driven MBTI personality test

64 posts in this topic

Posted (edited)

1 hour ago, Natasha Tori Maru said:

Raises an interesting question - is a model/frame useless if it has merit but is misused? 

You could argue this wrt some of Leos work. 

Outcome vs intent 

There’s a difference between a model being misused by people who haven’t understood or embodied it, versus a model that is just misleading because of its internal problems.

I’d argue MBTI is more the latter.

Edited by aurum

"Finding your reason can be so deceiving, a subliminal place. 

I will not break, 'cause I've been riding the curves of these infinity words and so I'll be on my way. I will not stay.

 And it goes On and On, On and On"

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Type

Priors (25%)

Likelihood

Posterior (%)

Rationale (Key Cues)

INTJ

0.25

0.80

40%

High: introversion, abstract vision, logical analysis, structured planning. Ni+Te fit.

INFJ

0.25

0.60

30%

Moderate: introverted and intuitive, but less emotional evidence. (Would have Fe)

INTP

0.25

0.40

20%

Lower: logical and introspective, but P vs J conflict (structure). (Ne-Ti pattern)

ENTJ

0.25

0.20

10%

Low: agenda-driven but extroversion evidence is lacking (contrasts other cues).

 

That‘s with 1.000 examples and ChatGPT 4.5 Deep Research.

Nice idea and execution btw @Carl-Richard


“Did you ever say Yes to a single joy? O my friends, then you said Yes to all woe as well. All things are chained and entwined together, all things are in love; if ever you wanted one moment twice, if ever you said: ‘You please me, happiness! Abide, moment!’ then you wanted everything to return!” - Friedrich Nietzsche
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Nilsi said:

Type

Priors (25%)

Likelihood

Posterior (%)

Rationale (Key Cues)

INTJ

0.25

0.80

40%

High: introversion, abstract vision, logical analysis, structured planning. Ni+Te fit.

INFJ

0.25

0.60

30%

Moderate: introverted and intuitive, but less emotional evidence. (Would have Fe)

INTP

0.25

0.40

20%

Lower: logical and introspective, but P vs J conflict (structure). (Ne-Ti pattern)

ENTJ

0.25

0.20

10%

Low: agenda-driven but extroversion evidence is lacking (contrasts other cues).

 

That‘s with 1.000 examples and ChatGPT 4.5 Deep Research.

Nice idea and execution btw @Carl-Richard

Although engaging mainly in intellectual discussions on an internet forum isn’t necessarily a good reflection of a person’s overall personality, if you ask me.


“Did you ever say Yes to a single joy? O my friends, then you said Yes to all woe as well. All things are chained and entwined together, all things are in love; if ever you wanted one moment twice, if ever you said: ‘You please me, happiness! Abide, moment!’ then you wanted everything to return!” - Friedrich Nietzsche
 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3.7.2025 at 0:09 AM, Nilsi said:

Although engaging mainly in intellectual discussions on an internet forum isn’t necessarily a good reflection of a person’s overall personality, if you ask me.

That's why I think it undervalues my Fi. I would have to give it an essay detailing my life and aspirations and values to really get that across. However, the real use for AI would be when you can download an app and it essentially collects data from everything in your life, including real life. That is also when you can create truly accurate models, not just scoring somebody on an existing model. And it could also give more personalized accounts that don't fit neatly into a four-letter model. "You talk to yourself in your sleep".

Edited by Carl-Richard

Intrinsic joy = being x meaning ²

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now