Faceless

Hehehe ? You are already aware of it.

I have noticed many seem to be unaware of this movement. To me it’s the #1 most important thing to relaized to embody any understanding actually.

You will ? it’s a movement that is inherent in the ego/thought. I will send you The concept so you can easily identify/observe it in your own inner movements.

This is the only thing I have ever been interested in this deeply. Remeber these realizations don’t depend on a certain amount of time. Some take years and some it realization of spontaneous and all of a sudden. Once you get into psychological time and that movement starts to end you have already realized what takes many decades to finally see. And in this you will see the beauty of what is. We are all beginners. Learning is a two way street. We are sharing with one another. Their is no teacher. This is for you and only you. Don’t let it become a chore. Don’t let effort destroy its beauty. Thats very important. To me anyway?

Hehehe To experience the entirety of the drama. Because life for the perspective of self/ego is a drama.

Can’t have one without the other?

@who chit ?

??‍♂️ I’m more intereted in why I ask certain questions?

So one has to ask am I conforming to my idea of being peaceful, good, positive, and so on, or are you negating all such abstractions ‘movements of thought/self’ and staying attentive to those very movemts? This is what determiens action that is truly genuine in action and action that is actually in-genuine. Does any of this make sense to anyone out there???

This is why “common morality” is in fact very immoral. But try explaining that to a preacher hehehe?

This may be very subtle so go through slowly... The thing is to neither seek positivity or negativity, as to choose one or another is simply an idea or an abstraction. What is needed is not to choose one or another but to remain aware of what is actual. Not do thoughts usual game of choosing between two parts, sides, perspectives, and so on. To say I’m going to be positive is escaping from what is ‘fact’ to an idea of positivity. If positivity is born of thought then it is not positive as in magnanimous or benevolent. Do you see this? Do you see how this same movement is responsible for wanting to be moral but that choosing to be moral “of thought” true morality is not? Aagin see this in your own inner happenings. It’s very very important to grasp.

Pleasure being a movement of thought remembers through memory how great that experience was then seeks to experience it again. If it doesn’t experience it their is pain. Also if one invites pleasure their is the possibility of that pleasurable experience ending which invites fear, therfore pain. Their is a prepetual movement to capture and sustain pleasure which only strengthens the pleasure more and more. This leads to perpetual pain and suffering. Can you see that in yourself?

Can their be pleasure without pain?

I think she’s asking if they are in fact seperate. Or if they are one in the same movement.

Well said friend? Does this guy know his chit or what?!!!

Thanks ?? Well have you realized the significance of ending psychological time? This is what allowed this form of inquiry to run so smoothly. I didn’t learn how to inquire as I think that is dependent on the one who inquires. I have never read any books so I can’t recommend any. It’s only over the last few months I have been exploring what others have said through a few videos. But before that I was solo on the inquiry. Observation of the inward ‘thoughts’ and the outward nature as a whole “happening” really seemed to be my source of insight. Who are you currently watching or reading?

Her sincerity is beautiful. It’s a great advantage

??

A short clip to Invoke interest to anyone feeling cofused

Good one?

Psychological time and the knower/known. We really seem to be on the same page. You see the similarities here? I have only listened to a couple of sadhguru vids. We seem to share similarities to. ?

? ??

That’s a good question for people to ask @robdl To me this is very important.... Any form of psychological knowledge should be disregard. As that is the driving force to all confusion, conflict, and disorder. Psychological knowledge becomes a barrier to what is. If a conclusion is made in accordance to any movement of psychological time this will lead to self deception, illusion, and their will inevitably become a self imposed image that acts as a barrier to realizing/learning anything new. The clinging to old ‘known’ will conflict with any possiblity of that which is presented as new. So all accumulated knowledge will at some point become contradicting. And when their is contradiction their is always confussion. This is a fact. Meeting each moment with an image ‘accumulation of past psychological knowledge’ will lead to never actually meeting that moment or coming to any original realization. To me this is very important. Time must end for creativity to bloom. And to me creativity is what it’s all about. If time ‘knowledge’ is accumulated psychologically their can be no creativity. anyone else have something to share

Watts, Mooji, Sadghuru...nice mix?

I have never read any books of his. But I have listened to him recently. His sharings really resonate with me. Also he is a great communicator.