Faceless

Hahaha ?

Wouldn’t want to project would we?? Hehe Hahah ? We can make our own path with no particular destination in mind.

@WindInTheLeaf Just walk for the sake of walking hehehe?

Just explore without anticipation of the destination. Because it’s interesting?. To me the most interesting thing to investigate and inquire into. You will not be sorry

No matter what anyone says you must see for yourself. Don’t let the word prevent what is. People will say there is no path and people will say there is a path. Never the less anything they say has absolutely no relevance to you in that regard what so ever. It’s a necessity to free oneself from any form of authority what so ever, especially your own. To go into this with any assumption what so ever imples lack of freedom to inquire and explore for yourself honestly, which is absolutely necessary. There must be freedom from opinions, conclusions, and the stuff of the mind to explore and find out for your self what is true.

Hehe ?

??

In this case his path was obviously the absence of a path. Hehe. As this was the case for me as well. But when one thinks they need a path, well who are we to tell them otherwise. This is something they have to see for themselves. Truth “timelessness” can not be communicated by words “time”...One must climb that mountain themselves. But having someone else climb the mountain and come back and explain it in words will never suffice. As the description is never that which is described. So??‍♂️ The point is to see the falsness in choice. To see that choice “time/duality” implies confusion, and that confusion is the result of the inherent contradiction that the observer is different than that which they observe. “Division/fragmentation” and therfore conflit and disharmony.

Hehehe!! Me to. I never went. I wouldn’t comply. I learned the most from observing myself in relationship to nature.

@Charlotte ??

@zoey101 ??

@Moses The way in which you are using time is quite productive and is the very purpose of time/thought. But this time has transferred over to the psychological realm “psychological time” This is a movement of thought. The movement of thought is the response of memory, knowledge, and past experience. All of that is expressing itself in the here and now. Which is over static movement over crowding the now which is dynamic. Dhnamic=new static=old So you are meeting the present “now” which is static/living/active, with that of memory/thought which is always static “dead/old” For example, how can we be creative “which implies create something totally new/original with anything that is old” ??? If you were to use knowledge/memory which is “static” to try and create something new “dynamic” this implies that the very attempt would be completely futile. As that would only be an invention that was influenced by that static “knowledge/memory”... Do you see that in practical matter such as what you explained you are using time which is “static” as a tool to respond accordingly to survive. The now is dynamic, but you have you mechanically invited time, that which is static, as a means to satisfy that now. This is a movement in becoming psychologically secure. Only the very inviting time breeds more insecurity. Because to enjoy the now needs no anticipation what so ever. Anticipation is for practical affairs like planning and such. To enjoy this moment time is not necessary. To see this moment as new which is space from time. Remember freedom from time, the “dynamic/creative/new” is to end time “memory/and it’s compulsion to project itself onto the now and into the future” and enter that which is timeless. So you the knower/known “time” must end to meet the dynamic nature of now. As I was writing this I realized this probably won’t make sense to you now. This will probably not be understood now because you may be time bound. So I would book mark this so you can come back to it. You may come to understand soon or a later. But here are couple of videos. The bottom one is from @cetus56 and one I found a while back to help you start to grasp what is said. Any way I hope I have helped. I feel as if I couldn’t put quality time into this post as my 2 year old demands my attention. Hehe

@Charlotte ⭕️ ??

An indivisible and therefor complete action. This implies purpose that is whole or “holy” And that is quite a purpose

@Charlotte

Communication expresses itself that way yes hehe you will see?

Thats the point.. There is no point of view in what is. Truth/Intelligence is the absnsce of any particular point of of view, “movement of thought” Point of view is a part of the manifestation of the underlying substance, truth/nothingness. This perception is complete/infinite action without point of view all together, and void of time. Point of view is never truth. ?

This is a great one for you @Sirius

I do not think there’s one thing he and I don’t see eye to eye on. We are very similar in how we see this happening. Only his communication skill was so tremendously valuable. I appreciate this man very much. As I appreciate you and this sharing @cetus56 ⭕️ ??

Exactly ??

This is what I do. To have a centerless/headless walk. Except “I” don’t feel it’s presence, there is just a total/whole presence/happening. Except there is no me that distinguishes between other. There is no point of view as point of view doesn’t even exsist. There is nothingness. This is joy, beauty, creativity, compassion/love.

Think of it like this...Less self is more, Be space for another face?

I haven’t got into much of his stuff, but the very little I have he really seems to get it.

Dynamic??