Carl-Richard

You're not gonna post your paint experiences in the psychedelic sub-section are you?

Meditation is simple, not easy ☺️

Less immediate feedback means less flow. Fast forum is moving meditation.

I can't sit like that 😀

This is not a state issue. You're making statements. It's a statement issue. Sri Ramana Maharshi did not have a problem with state. Rupert Spira does not have a problem with state. Yet they disagree with your statements. https://tomdas.com/2024/03/30/aham-sphurana-book-excerpt-solipsism-and-the-shock-of-hearing-the-ajata-teachings-sri-ramana-maharshi-advaita-vedanta/

You did it again. *Pulls frog out of pocket* Just kidding. I'm happy to report no frogs in the vicinity (in thought, perception, or dreams), so this one is all on you 😝

It's uncalled condescension (not in a teacher-student dynamic). But that's not the real issue. It's that your condescension is irrelevant. You're making a logical case, and logic is not awakening. I have a problem with your logic. I didn't ask for how egoless you are. It's definitely possible to be condescending without intending to be. And thanks for saying my name, it's the coolest name in the world. Narcissist gaslighting is a very specific term. https://www.charliehealth.com/post/things-narcissists-say-in-an-argument-and-what-they-really-mean Anytime you're arguing for solipsism, you're arguing from a position of logic. It can be condescension even if it's true. Ok ok ok ok, we get it, you are not a narcissist. Thanks for reassuring us.

"You just need to awaken" is condescending. "You're just imagining that it's condescending" is gaslighting.

https://chatgpt.com/s/t_68adfb3c0a788191922bf02764080b78

Wow very narcissistic gaslighting you got going on here. Wow.

He is talking about experiencing brain damage from his health problems, not his psychedelic use?

"It's interesting you take it that way" *continues being condescending and doing exactly what I described you were doing* Listen up: just because I disagree with your psychotic ramblings about life being a video game and only your bedroom being real, does not imply anything about personal experiences of the absolute. "Hua hua, you just lack awakening my friend". No, you're just psychotic. It's like you're talking about Red Pill philosophy and then somebody disagrees, and then you say "haha that's just because you're a virgin".

The reason people get confused is because people like you use fuzzy language while speaking with big authoritative capital letter exclamations and calling any sign of disagreement with your position as lack of awakening.

"No distinctions", yet "video game". Brilliant, Nobel Prize, bring it.

🫡 Straight shoota, shoota poo thoughts straight outta yo head. Ok I have to go to bed (that rhymed). (Btw, the first thought was "so you're walking your dog" but I did a logic thought afterward which destroyed it, oh well). Nice dog btw.

😂 So you just walked your dog, ok. Playing psychic darts right now.

The Wheel of Samsara or the Veil of Maya (and what some solipsists claim must undeniably be the Absolute 🤔).

Then he was not talking to you, congratz. Again, more cash in the "solipsists contradict each other" bucket.

He said "only".

I'm just screaming into the void, don't worry 👍

You gotta word that better.

1. The guy is awakened, not enlightened (according to my enlightenment radar; if you disagree, you're obviously wrong). 2. I don't give a fuck. This is a problem about logic. You can be absolutely psychotic and enlightened at the same time. And it was said tongue in cheek, mirroring his condescending remark, except I made it direct instead of making it indirect, which is another brilliant tactic.

If nothingness had been realized, you wouldn't have tried to claim that some very particular somethingness is implied by the Absolute.

I'm pretty sure he was talking about re-activations, which is actually not a problem unless you're scared of being enlightened. Or maybe he has said something else.

And? The absolute doesn't hinge on logic. Solipsism (videogame version) hinges on inelegant logic. If you want to give me a logical account of reality, do it well: don't assume unnecessary entities, don't equivocate, don't make an unnecessary mess.