-
Content count
14,287 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Carl-Richard
-
Carl-Richard replied to DieFree's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Nooooo ? @thisintegrated ? -
Carl-Richard replied to DieFree's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
I think the main job of the criminal justice system is to create a safe society, and I don't think killing a few naked prisoners is going to have a dramatic effect on improving the safety of society. I sense the lust for retribution. -
Carl-Richard replied to DieFree's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Should we kill kids with ADHD? Jking -
Carl-Richard replied to DieFree's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
I don't think the worst killers are actually that much worse in terms of behavior than the average violent prisoner, and again, you're not really removing that many people through executions. -
Carl-Richard replied to DieFree's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
https://medium.com/@batchellerlauren/the-emotional-impact-on-executioners-9c448c4e02ec -
Carl-Richard replied to DieFree's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Executioner is not exactly an unproblematic occupation either. Very few people get the death penalty, and you're still stuck with a large population of assholes in prison. -
Carl-Richard replied to DieFree's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Looks like the deterrent effect is actually not that good. https://www.aclu.org/other/death-penalty-questions-and-answers So we're stuck with economics. Should we kill severely disabled people? -
Carl-Richard replied to DieFree's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
Ok, so other than deterrence and economics, what does the death penalty reliably achieve? I have a suspicion that people who are pro-death penalty are trying in a roundabout way to justify their feelings of retribution ("well, they deserve it"), because I'm trying to find another example where we can justifiably kill somebody for economical reasons, and the first argument that pops up is "but who deserves to die?" I don't think anyone deserves to die. -
I'll leave this here:
-
Carl-Richard replied to Someone here's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
The Cartesian-Newtonian worldview reduces the world down to atoms and physical laws, and it splits the mind/soul away from the physical and makes it secondary and unimportant. When the scientists became the new priestly class, this became the prevailing metaphysics in the mind of the modern man, and so even the atheists who pretend to only reject the claims of theism, uses their unconscious metaphysical assumptions as arguments against theism. -
Carl-Richard replied to DieFree's topic in Society, Politics, Government, Environment, Current Events
It just feels wrong. We need to distinguish between killing to neutralize an immediate threat and the death penalty. You can kill in self-defense if somebody is posing an immediate threat to your life. The police can kill you if you're an immediate threat to somebody else's life. A country will kill foreign soldiers who pose an immediate threat to their country. But if you're in jail, you're no longer an immediate threat to anyone. So what message does the state send to its citizens with the death penalty? "We will kill you not because we have to, but because we can". -
@Raptorsin7 I've had some thought about your recent posts. If you want to stay on the forum, you have to stop signal boosting Nick Fuentes' ideological viewpoints. It's fine to talk about Nick Fuentes or criticize his views, but to endorse his views like this is against what this forum stands for: https://www.actualized.org/forum/guidelines/ The amount of uncritical posting of Fuentes content and the favorable reviews you're writing about him is creating a space for radicalization towards these extreme ideologies, and it will inevitably cause harm in the real world.
-
You should be thinking about whatever your mind wants to think about. You can't stop thinking. Your only job in the meditation session is to practice the technique you've chosen. Preferably quiet, secluded and hidden from view. You should be sitting upright on a decently firm surface, but you should also be comfortable and relaxed.
-
Meditation has been to shown to correlate with health behaviors. I personally think most of this effect is mediated through the immediate internal feelings that healthy behaviors produce, more so than believing in the future promises of said behaviors (e.g. decrease in morality, increased longevity, illness prevention). One benefit of the immediate nature of those feelings is that it bypasses much of the problem of delayed gratification usually associated with investing in health behaviors. Examples of internal feelings (I'm choosing things you would want to avoid to be more illustrative) could be eating too much cake and feeling nauseous, or eating too much junk food and feeling fatigued and mentally dull, or drinking caffeine and then experiencing the crash, or cheating on your workout routine and feeling dull because you're not getting those feelgood chemicals. I'm probably going to write a thesis on this subject which you can read in year
-
Carl-Richard replied to Someone here's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Atheism is really just another name for the Cartesian-Newtonian worldview. -
Destiny's weakest arguments: Defining a word makes the word useless. People only use words like "nazi" for the emotional appeal and moral condemnation, not for their descriptive and pragmatic utility. Words like "nazi" have been destroyed, language is inherently vague, and words depend on context, therefore there is no reason for me to define the word "nazi" in any conversation or generally control how "nazi" is used in my community.
-
When I think about it, me being "pretty ADD" in my teen years was more a combination of brain fog from fapping so much and probably wrong diet, anxiety and lack of meaning (and the stress and drain of energy from all of that) than an actual ADD condition. My struggles were spiritual, emotional and physiological rather than cognitive/neurological.
-
It's like scratching yourself when you feel an itch. Nothing can replace that.
-
Flashback to when my dealer said he smoked 50g in a day with a friend and his friend had to go to the mental hospital afterwards ?
-
Back when I used to fap often, I was pretty ADD. Ejaculation causes a surge of prolactin (quite literally anti-dopamine) which lasts for days. But you might want to try it out if you're out of options and it's really limiting you.
-
Oh for sure. While the benefits of nofap are generally exaggerated, there is a baby in the bathwater there. Limiting fapping/porn to around 2-3 times a week makes a huge difference for me (compared to fapping at least every night).
-
I'm just trying to balance out this complete psychosis of language that is going on But yes, we should stay on topic. Working memory and IQ is just one of those things that you're born with. The things you can work on other than meditation that maximizes your cognitive potential is just to optimize all forms of health: physical exercise, diet, sleep etc.
-
I don't care lol
-
I'm basing it on psychonautwiki which is based off of probably hundreds of trip reports.
-
Math skews towards the "drier" aspects of the intellect: logical capacity & conceptual knowledge > creativity & intuition, while e.g. psychology skews towards the more moist side. Basically left-brain vs. right-brain. As for "good employee", IQ (decent measurement for intellect) is the best predictor for occupational success alongside conscientiousness, so again you're off.