UDT

Member
  • Content count

    767
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by UDT

  1. @Wijuu keep it up champ. Increase your metabolism and you can fix it
  2. @mmKay If you're buying grass fed grass finished pasture raised liver, then you will get a quality product. Animal vitamins are usually in the right ratios for better absorption to the body. As you already said, phytotoxins block mineral absorption from plant foods. I wouldn't wonder if Leo used to jug down kale green smoothies and the like, why his hypothyroidism got so bad. In terms of nutrient density, animal foods, especially liver is number one. Just science - not some diet dogma. The liver does not store toxins, it metabolizes them. The liver also metabolizes all the good stuff. It comes down to is the animal toxic then their produce will be toxic (organs more than flesh but still flesh as well)
  3. Caffeine and sugar are a bad couple. Caffeine boost adrenaline which release fat into the blood stream. High sugar now enters the blood stream too due to your drink. Now there is a biochemical process by which these two compete for entry into your cells to be converted into energy (ATP) by mitochondria. This leads to blood sugar levels staying elevated for too long while at the same time your insulin secretion continuously gets higher and higher. This is the fastlane to insulin resistance. I made a video about it on YouTube/timwhitehealth
  4. Constantly eating junk is not a passion - it is an addiction to blood sugar spikes and food high. No nutritionist eats their diet without exception. They eat their diet 90% of the time. And then its no problem. One example - If Im getting offered a crazy deep fried choco donut, I will look at what I ate today, the time of the day, what I am doing in the next hours and will adapt this so that I can comfortably munch the donut. Will the fried fat cause oxidative damage ? Ofc. Will the simple glucose spike my blood sugar levels sending me to space? Ofc. But If this is my problem, then I need to stop breathing as well because oxygen is literally deadly poison we learned to utilize And if I dont breathe Im gonna die - If I dont eat the donut Im also gonna die. It is all about balance.
  5. Heyhey! Since Leo conversed to the pharma lobby I wanted to share some footage coming out of Pfizer sharing how the booster vaxx is neither a cure nor a vaccine, just a little antibody spiking experience against one protein of a virus But its billions of USD my ladies and gents. This video features hidden camera of Pfizer employees talking - very entertaining
  6. In George Orwell´s 1984 - the leading party "rewrites" history, cuts unwelcome words out of the dictionary and in so remains its power. It "rewrites" history to conform with its narrative. Now I´ve heard from a german colleague - they banned the word for riding the train without a ticket as it is called "riding black" in German. The origin of the word for black comes from jewish for poor though. It is a little bit similar to censor saying "I like black coffee" bcs it is racist. Do you think it is healthy to censor language to that extend? This is not the N-word. It leaves the door open for future censorship, which in the extreme, is used by Orwells nightmare dictatorship to change citizen behavior. __ What I see happening is people who share medical, scientific or other information are getting banned from platforms under the veil of it being "hate speech and misinformation". ( the inventor of the mRNA vaccine getting banned off linkedIn for sharing pubmed study). Now, if everything can become mis-information or hate speech, because we do not clearly define, what it is or what it is not - we leave the door open for agencies to censor what they don´t want out there, just using "oh it was hate speech and fake news" as the argument - and no one can really see if it was true or not. Clearly a pubmed study has nothing to do with gender rights. But today it is enough for major platforms to ban, email you "this was taken down because it violates mis-information policy" and that´s it. This is what I am not happy with, and neither should anyone - who does want to preserve a healthy freedom of information and free speech, which is essential for a healthy society imo. Edit: Ive repeated this 3x times already but this threat is not about gender, sex, religion, or freedom of expression. (again these are great things.) -> Its about the censorship and dictation of which words are being allowed to use, the deplatforming of scientists in the name of "anti-hate speech, mis-information, fake news" which bears a lot of similarity to what is described in George Orwell 1984 by which a positive wording is used in a straw-man matter to push through censorship which has nothing to do with gender or other of these topics, but is just put forward as a justification for such action.
  7. @Emerald what are you talking about? What a bizzare reply ?
  8. @UNZARI Only way is to get metabolically healthy. Fatigue is fixable.
  9. -not medical advice- 1) If you can remove it surgically without losing organ function, I would do it (but this wont fix the problem, just help ) 2) Search cancer clinics in latin america 3) Read books on how cancer develops, what oxygen, & sugar have to do with it, how fasting and sugar deprivation can shrink tumors etc. (careful graphic) Check this liver metastasis, cancer is no joke
  10. I think it is about MASTERY Now, the definition of mastery will depend a little upon your SD stage / how you think. For me ,Mastery e.g. means the mastering of skills which bring me closer to God But I agree with you, I dont think a fortune 500 CEO in 2021 can be above yellow, as the contradictions between his values and the impact of his business diverges a lot. But as you grow in consciousness - it will be harder and harder to find something "clean". Should watch the society is a large abusive family video at the channel
  11. Tripping changes your consciousness permanently. BUT What you are experiencing is most likely your psyche trying to find back to homeostasis. Takes a while. From 2g mushrooms, you almost certainly did not shoot yourself out of here. So don´t worry, eat clean, stay healthy, excercise, journal. What you should do is take the time to properly integrate what you did experience and not rush back into "normalcy" Edit: Assuming you do not take any medication prior or post tripping such as SSRIs
  12. Lectins and tons of poly unsaturated fatty acid which go rancid under the heat of "making" the peanut butter + storage time. Causes inflammation and oxidative damage in the body, esp. in the gut. Should not turn your urine purple though, thats rather unusual
  13. When confronted by a pandemic of a painful, often injurious (long haul syndrome), and potentially deadly disease for which there is no existing early treatment, the responsible policy for a Public Health Agency is to issue an emergency use authorization for any promising drug with a good safety record, along with appropriate tentative cautions, and initially only to providers who participate in an effect-monitoring program. If positive results come in, the cautions can be relaxed and participation in the program can be expanded, along with hints about the best protocols. Any degree of effectiveness is a reason for expansion of the program; statistical proof of efficacy beyond a reasonable doubt is not needed at an early stage, but will come in time, given even slight effectiveness. Even inconclusive initial results justify continuing the program, as effectiveness may depend on the discovery, in practice, of the proper protocol. Only if no effective protocol eventually emerges should the program be terminated. It is an irresponsible policy that demands certainly before an EUA, because its delay condemns multitudes to certain discomfort, disability, and death in the interim. And also because even the supposedly best-run RCTs are fallible, due to their narrowness. The only downside of an authorize-and-observe policy is the potential embarrassment of the drug not working. But that loss of face comes with the territory of “battlefield medicine,” which encompasses Covid-medicine, where doing nothing is not an option. So the way this commentator frames the issue is all wrong. Given that none of the studies so far have found significant adverse effects, there is no justification for delaying an EUA for ivermectin. The downside of delay is disability and death. That ought to weigh more than the loss of a public health authority’s infallible social status. Who cares about that but the hubristic—who deserve above all to lose it. Quote from RogerKnights
  14. So it seems like Ivermectin usability against covid 19 is being suppressed due to the good old pharma money interests. I just want to leave this here because when covid returns in winter and you happen to be in danger, ivermectin might save your ass. I don't wanna get into it here too much, I just appreciate that this forum is still relatively free speech. Ivermectin is from the 1970s, has billions of doses taken already by humans, shows in vivo and vitro help against covid viruses and is off-patent, so no one can make money from it. Please visit this website for study data: http://www.ivmmeta.com This is not medical advice. DYOR.
  15. @integral Well, first of all kudos to you sir, hugely appreciate that you are helping her and below are just my suggestions written down in one go; Youre focusing her on the past which sucked, or the present which sucks. Do the whole Jordan Peterson Shenanigans. https://selfauthoring.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/Pdf/WritingBenefits.pdf She needs 1) a compelling vision for her future (age 20-25 where am I, what am I doing, how awesome can life be? How do I GET THERE NOW?) 2) What if I stay where I am? Stuck there? Get her motivated, make her strong instead of how sorry you feel for her horrible life. Thats not helpful. Buy her a diary book and let her write Get her school tutoring Find out if shes passionate about sports or drawing --> foster that ! It doesnt help her nickles when she "resolves all her trauma" but ends up like her mom with no job bcs no one told her she needs to do sh1t to improve. All the best dude!
  16. Btw I think were this post goes wrong is the age gap of participants. Your view on "dating" and the opposite sex etc. changes so dramatically between 16 to 30 that you´d laugh at your self two years ago and so it goes. So really when ppl argue here and one dude is 14 the other 22, it makes no sense, because the experience is so vastly different
  17. Lol Do you wear a collar too? Ridiculous statement. But a good laugh thanks
  18. @Zigzag Idiot Sure, that´s why scientists undertake control group studies in which under random selection, participants of the study either receive a sugar pill, or the medicine (Ivermectin) - and then the outcome for the patients is compared against the ones who were given the "placebo". In other words, If the medicine does not work, scientist see no clear difference in healing between the sugar pill and the medicine. Participants of course do not know if they were given the drug or a sugar pill. Over 32 such studies have been conducted on ivermectin, as you can see on the website Ive posted or the screenshot. Basically we both see in vitro (so ivermectin vs. virus in the lab) and in vivo (ivermectin vs. virus in a human) results indicating great benefits of early stage ivermectin treatment. Late stage results are poorer because c19 causes massive inflammation, which ivermectin can only partially does help with. Hope that cleared some of your questions up !
  19. @Anastas Sia Of course. But what I see happening is people who share medical, scientific or other information are getting banned from platforms under the veil of it being "hate speech and misinformation". (said it already, the inventor of the mRNA vaccine getting banned off linkedIn for sharing pubmed study). What I´m saying is, if everything can become mis-information or hate speech, because we do not clearly define, what it is or what it is not - we leave the door open for agencies to censor what they dont want out there, just using "oh it was hate speech and fake news" as the argument - and no one can really see if it was true or not. Clearly a pubmed study has nothing to do with gender rights. But today it is enough for major platforms to ban, email you "this was taken down because it violates mis-information policy" and that´s it. This is what I am not happy with, and neither should anyone - who does want to preserve a healthy freedom of information and free speech, which is essential for a healthy society imo.
  20. @Extreme Z7 lol what? So in no way ever did I say that - your accusation is groundless.. See what I did say was this: Its not my job to quote myself, could you read what I wrote before commenting on what I wrote? Makes sense right. Nice, next time say what you bet so I can give you my paypal. You really did not say anything new and every of the points you made could have been answered by reading what I, or others, wrote already. I already did say everything what I wanted to say so please is it possible you respect that I said Im not replying anymore? You only made me reply because you said I want people to yell "burn the gays" which is a horrible accusation, not in the slightest the truth, so I had to respond to this. Thank you for understanding.
  21. @FoolsGold A Chinese proverb says: “The best time to plant a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is now.” An American proverb says: “The best time to buy Raytheon stock was 20 years ago. The second best time is now.”
  22. You don´t understand that our complete culture is happening online. If you force sub groups off of the major platforms, they will radicalize in off-mainstream communication channels. Thats exactly when radicalisation happens. You believing you can errect a global filter to judge what misinformation, conspirational thinking, toxic ideologies etc. are and censor them, is the danger for a free society. You just have to take a look into history to confirm that Not that it wouldnt be a good thing to moderate toxicity and hate speech. It would be awesome. But its practically impossible. According to mainstream materialism, Actualized.org is mis-information. ___ Again I encourage everyone who participated in this discussion and has not, to get the audio or written of 1984 and take a weekend to read it. It seems some here are quite naive and take a functioning society for granted. With that Im out of here
  23. Where am I complaining? Does Kumbaja stand for "censor the shit out of the internet" ? Imagine we have the same issue but its 500y earlier, so the censors are all about religion. They watch a Leo video about god, their crucifix falls from the wall, youre reported and out for hate speech and misinformation. Millions of people never hear your message, you cant even make money from it, so you put out 1/10 of the videos you´d normally. Is that good for society? Imagine its 1000y into the future and stage Aliencolor censors every last blue fundamentalist --> Still wrong! This leads to extremism, sub-groups, a split society, and worse. And again its not about obvious racism or appeals for violence, its about dangerously vague policies leading to some platforms controlling the information flow of the entire western world. Doesnt really sound green. More like orange instrumentalizing some green values for its purposes.
  24. You would not make a comment like this if you´d read the book. The N-word relates to slavery and the dark past of white american owners. To my knowledge colored people can still use it. When a scientist is banned for "hate speech" because he shared a pubmed article, or a citizen is "deplatformed" for using the wrong wording (not as in the N-word a clear insult), you get into an area where you can spin the rules in favor of the institution in power. What is "correct speech" and what is "hate speech" is in the eye of the judge. I could go back watch some video of you where you say something slightly ambiguous, then report you as a hate speech homophobe and you´re done. Is that the world you want to live in? Again, it is not about clearly as insulting defined words such as the N-word or calling native americans "Indians". Its when there is no clear boundary so everything becomes hate speech and everyone can pull the trigger on everyone.
  25. @SaWaSaurus What I'm referring to, is the deletion of certain words out of the vocabulary. An example here is Germany, where riding the train without a ticket is called "riding black" (black is originating from Jewish for poor in that context however) which is now forbidden because it could be interpreted as racist. This opens the door for further censorship of words, as a lot of words could offend someone, leaving us with a reduced unclear dumbed down allowed vocabulary in the long run - like it is aimed at by Orwell's fictionary regime. I'm not saying this is happening or this is the plan of some evil conspiring actors, but this sort of behavior is opening the door for it in a concerning manner.