Alexop

I strongly doubt that. Maybe relationships that "originated online".

According to Pew Research, about 12% of overall dating app users report finding a committed, long-term relationship or marriage through the platforms. Wow sounds like shit.

Definitely. 90%+ girls i met via dating app had avoidant patterns. And yes, guys suck ass, so women have a hard time getting attracted to the few ones they meet randomly. So they try dating apps instead.

This is what I was trying to show. It became the norm not the exception. In Romania, 7-8 years ago, I remember that being on a dating app was a loser thing to do. Now I live in Sweden and I see that this is the norm. It is either some masterful social circle you do or a dating app. And there is a high chance that the women you meet in real life will also consider dating app options. So you'll compete with that.

Agreed.

Relationships can form like that but many times women who use them, they get choice paralysis. They stop answering or they go to the date just to message the guy the next day that "there was no spark". I personally had a relationship made on dating app. But many other girls I found there were just confused or sacred of vulnerability.

Not everyone of course. And it depends by country.

Maybe you should not just play devil's advocate here.

It is an observation. I see many women stuck in choice anxiety

LMAO

Yes. This too. Even Leo who says he can live alone, is still spending thousands of hours here talking with you guys. In my case, and most probably Leo's case, the need for a female partner who understands me and appreciates me. I just cannot. I need it. And if you are not asexual or some similar special genetics (which I think you don't) then you need a woman. Yes, women are Maya. But our biology screams for them. Straight men with normal genetics need women, prove me wrong. I don't care how enlightened you are. Many enlightened monks end up sexually frustrated and lonely.

oh, that’s a tough one. A bias toward the truth JK. A bias toward psychedelics. Just because they worked perfectly for you, it doesn’t mean they work for everyone. I wouldn’t necessarily call this a "bias," but you do tend to use generalizing rhetoric when it comes to women. Which could get you into trouble. When describing aspects of the female mind, it would be better to avoid the short, sharp remarks you’re in the habit of making. Especially these days, when many men are actually more emotional and easily offended than women.

She is not a teenager, she is a mature mother. But it is very easy to see she had a rough childhood. She is full of trauma that has to be addressed. We cannot hold up our opinions just because we have some people around who did not address their trauma and insecurities. This is not a psychotherapy forum nor a woke shithole. It breaks my heart to see sooo many women traumatized and broken by this retarded society. This is exactly why we need to pursue truth and slowly fix society with it.

Yes. It was on my thread about human biology that Natasha shared. But that was only the drop that filled the glass. I think she was burned out by constant arguing with the users here. I personally do not spend lots of time here mainly because I met dishonest people here that make me lose interest in contributing. Male/female discussions made me spend a bit more time here and it is there I saw Emerald fighting hard. Now idk, we have to keep a balance on the forum. Between masculinity and femininity. We cannot just give up truth seeking so everyone feels included. In that case, I am am outa here. We are not children playing in the sand. We are a philosophy forum. But on the other hand, we cannot just let any asshole attack and insult people who diverge from the status quo. In that way we only will have some autistic circle jerkers who are dogpiling anyone who dare to critique those who dominate the Internal power dynamics. And in that case too, we can lose serious people.

It is a privilege relative to being forced to risk your life and attack a fortress. Or defend your own.

Of course, no problem with women who wnat to be tough and become soldiers. But they have to be sure that this is who they are. Not doing it because of ideology. Historically.. laying bricks and getting paid would be privilege

Arguing is ego.

It is too hard of a truth for then to swallow. They just don't want to accept it, because it makes them feel crippled. But they live a even more crippled life if they try to be men instead. And by doing this, they bring the whole society down. Those office jobs and shit are not real life. Real life is laying bricks the whole day in freezing cold for years and working with some gross uneducated men who bully you. If a woman is doing that, she won't be a woman anymore. She would just be a man with pussy.

How can these studies be taken seriously by the science community? https://www.iflscience.com/women-may-be-better-hunters-than-men-latest-research-argues-71719?fbclid=IwdGRjcAVDwIpjbGNrBUPAZ2V4dG4DYWVtAjExAHBkb2YFc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQMMzUwNjg1NTMxNzI4AAEejzx-QWBPu-rHAOLh9gF7Nd_lLminTbgNE3AKpcxyw0a4fnnLQ8KIPOwr4n4_aem_JsU8rcpx2Fp_xWn2xfOXtA If this can pass as science then science is just religion plus some fluke luck discovery by throwing shit at the wall and see what sticks. Better suitable to run the animals down to exhaustion? Woke dude, men can run marathons (42 km) faster than women. And I can imagine how excited women were to run 20 km after animals with a child in their belly or right before they gave birth. They usually had lots of pregnancies during their lifetime. Generally 4-9 births with 3-4 years in between. Try physically compete with men who are physically stronger and give no births at all.

Aha. It can be like that. Our men today suck ass.

I won't watch all that nonsense. What was the challenge about and why did women win?

This is a philosophy forum not kindergarten. Those who are not resilient enough and open-minded enough to endure debates and accept defeat will eventually burn out. Do you think I felt good when I had to admit all my insecurities, biases, wrong behaviour? It hurt like hell. But this is how you become an adult. By enduring hardships. Now of course sone here talk shit and behave improperly. This is why I don't really spend much time here. It is this subject that attracted me here. One of the few places where it can be discussed at an advanced level.

I hope she will charge her mind. One subject is one subject. There is plenty of good stuff to discuss on this forum other than masculine/feminine shit. I also am part of a leftist discord group who is all for men and women being the same..i realized that there is no chance in changing their mind and we completely avoid the subject while having very fruitful conversations about economics and similar nerdy stuff

Relax. I did not make a complex critique of the study. I just made a comment on the arguments of that "Ocowoke" researcher presented in the article. Such recontextualization, putting words in people's mouth, moving the goal posts, whatabaoutisms and side tracking makes me lose interest in arguing with you guys. ✌️

I've had this protest that Emerald has, a few years ago, about this forum. I had to accept that this is how people are and we cannot silence people. People should be free to express their opinion. If the quality of the conversation goes low, so be it. Accept the situation.